Literature DB >> 25250649

From potential donor to actual donation: does socioeconomic position affect living kidney donation? A systematic review of the evidence.

Phillippa Bailey1, Charles Tomson, Saira Risdale, Yoav Ben-Shlomo.   

Abstract

Evidence from Europe, Australia and the United States demonstrates that socioeconomically deprived individuals with advanced chronic kidney disease are less likely to receive a living kidney transplant compared with less deprived individuals. This systematic review focuses on how socioeconomic position (SEP) may influence hypothetical and actual living kidney donors and where appropriate, summarizes the quantitative evidence.In the general population, a higher SEP appears to be associated with an increased 'hypothetical' willingness to be a living kidney donor but with marked heterogeneity in the absolute differences (I = 95.9%, P < 0.001). In a commercial setting, lower SEP motivates people to donate. Outside of this setting, there is no evidence of discordance in the SEP of donors and recipients that would suggest undisclosed financial exchange. There is evidence for a complex interaction between SEP and other variables, such as ethnicity, sex, and the national economic climate. Some evidence suggests that measures to remove financial disincentives to donation are associated with an increase in living donation rates. Future research needs to study how SEP impacts the potential donor population from willingness to donate, progression through donor assessment to actual donor nephrectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25250649     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  4 in total

1.  Commercial Kidney Transplantation: Attitude, Knowledge, Perception, and Experience of Recipients.

Authors:  Fatma Al Rahbi; Issa Al Salmi
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2017-02-20

2.  Outcomes of Living Kidney Donor Candidate Evaluations in the Living Donor Collective Pilot Registry.

Authors:  Bertram L Kasiske; Yoon Son Ahn; Michael Conboy; Mary Amanda Dew; Christian Folken; Macey Levan; Ajay K Israni; Krista L Lentine; Arthur J Matas; Kenneth A Newell; Dianne LaPointe Rudow; Allan B Massie; Donald Musgrove; Jon J Snyder; Sandra J Taler; Jeffrey Wang; Amy D Waterman
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-04-22

3.  Barriers to living donor kidney transplantation in the United Kingdom: a national observational study.

Authors:  Diana A Wu; Matthew L Robb; Christopher J E Watson; John L R Forsythe; Charles R V Tomson; John Cairns; Paul Roderick; Rachel J Johnson; Rommel Ravanan; Damian Fogarty; Clare Bradley; Andrea Gibbons; Wendy Metcalfe; Heather Draper; Andrew J Bradley; Gabriel C Oniscu
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  Work of being an adult patient with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Javier Roberti; Amanda Cummings; Michelle Myall; Jonathan Harvey; Kate Lippiett; Katherine Hunt; Federico Cicora; Juan Pedro Alonso; Carl R May
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.