Literature DB >> 25250095

Radiofrequency heat-enhanced chemotherapy for breast cancer: towards interventional molecular image-guided chemotherapy.

Yurong Zhou1, Guocan Han1, Yue Wang1, Xi Hu1, Zhiming Li1, Lumin Chen1, Weixian Bai1, Jingfeng Luo1, Yajing Zhang1, Jihong Sun1, Xiaoming Yang2.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women worldwide. Recent developments in minimally invasive interventional radiology techniques have significantly improved breast cancer treatment. This study aimed to develop a novel technique for the local management of breast cancers using radiofrequency heat (RFH). We performed both in vitro experiments using human breast cancer cells and in vivo validation in xenograft animal models with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathological correlation to investigate the feasibility of our approach. Four treatment groups, including (1) no treatment (control), (2) RFH-only, (3) chemo (doxorubicin)-only, and (4) combination therapy with both doxorubicin and RFH, were conducted in each experiment. In vitro combination therapy significantly decreased breast cancer cell proliferation while increased their apoptosis index compared to the other three groups. MRI demonstrated a significant tumor size reduction in animals treated with combination therapy compared to those receiving other treatments in vivo. Such result was further confirmed by pathological examination. In conclusion, our findings suggests that RFH can enhance the therapeutic efficiency of doxorubicin on breast cancers, thus establishing the basis for future development of interventional molecular image-guided local chemotherapy for breast malignancies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; breast cancer; doxorubicin; hyperthermia.; radiofrequency

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25250095      PMCID: PMC4165778          DOI: 10.7150/thno.10006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theranostics        ISSN: 1838-7640            Impact factor:   11.556


Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women with a steadily increasing incidence worldwide. It is estimated that 235,030 patients will be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and 40,430 will die of the disease in the United States in 2014 1. Although systemic chemotherapy is one of the main therapeutic strategies for breast cancer, there is no guarantee that sufficient concentration of chemotherapeutic agents would be delivered to the target tumor without causing toxicities to other vital organs 2. In addition, previous studies have suggested that inefficient drug deposit at the target tumors via systemic administration significantly contribute to chemoresistance in cancer 3. Recent studies have reported that hyperthermia at approximately 41 ℃ to 45 ℃ can enhance the efficiency of chemotherapy in a variety of malignancies 4-7. However, certain limitations, such as inadequate devices for local heat delivery to the targets and lack of appropriate temperature monitoring at the targets, limit the application of hyperthermia-enhanced therapy for cancer in clinical practice 8, 9. Minimally invasive interventional radiology techniques have greatly improved outcome of breast cancer treatment 10. A combination of interventional radiology with locally delivered hyperthermia may therefore advance current chemotherapies. The present study aimed to develop a novel technique for local chemotherapy of breast cancer using interventional radiofrequency heat (RFH).

Materials and Methods

The present study included both in vitro establishment of the “proof-of-principle” that RFH enhanced chemotherapeutic efficiency in human breast cancer cells, and in vivo validation of interventional RFH-enhanced chemotherapy for breast cancer using xenograft animal models.

In vitro experiments

Cells

Human breast cancer cell (Bcap-37) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco-Life Technologies, Mulgrave, Australia) adjusted to contain 1.5-g/L sodium bicarbonate, 2.5-g/L glucose, and 0.11-g/L sodium pyruvate supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco-Life Technologies). They were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.

In vitro experimental set-up

These breast cancer cells were seeded in each chamber of a Lab-Tek® 4-chamber cell culture slide (Nalge Nunc International, Rochester, NY, USA) at 4 × 104 cells/chamber. The slice was placed in a 37 °C water bath. A 0.032-inch magnetic resonance imaging-heating-guidewire (MRIHG) was attached under the bottom of chamber 4 of the 4-chamber cell culture slide, and then connected to a 2450-MHz radiofrequency (RF) generator (GMP150, OPTHOS, Rockville, MD, USA) (Figure 1). When the RF generator was operated at 2-3 Watts through the MRIHG, the temperature in chamber 4 increased to approximately 42 °C from 37 °C, which created a heat gradient along the 4 chambers. The temperature of each chamber was recorded by a thermometer (Photon Control, Burnaby, Canada).
Figure 1

(A) In vitro experimental set-up for radiofrequency heat (RFH) of human breast cancer cells. Cells are seeded in a 4-chamber cell culture slide, which is placed in 37°C water bath. A 0.032-inch magnetic resonance imaging-heating-guidewire (arrow) is positioned under the bottom of chamber 4. (B) When the temperature reaching 42 °C in chamber 4, a stable heat gradient is observed along the four chambers. (C) The proliferation of cells treated with RFH at 42 °C is significantly decreased compared to those treated at 37 °C and 39 °C (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01).

For comparison of therapeutic effects among different RFH temperatures, the same amount of doxorubicin (0.25 µM) was dripped into each of the four chambers while the bottom of chamber 4 was heated to 42°C for 20 minutes and that of chamber 1 remained at 37 °C (Figure 1). For comparison of therapeutic effects among different treatments, breast cancer cells were divided into groups: no treatment (control), RFH-only (42 °C for 20 minutes), chemo-only (0.25 µM doxorubicin), and combination therapy (chemo plus RFH). The concentration of doxorubicin at 0.25 µM was selected based on previous studies by other groups11-13. Cells were then cultured for 72 hours before different laboratory examinations, including cell proliferation assay and apoptosis assay, were conducted to examine and compare the effects of various treatments on breast cancer cells.

Laboratory examinations

Cell proliferation was assessed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo, Kamimashiki-gun Kumamoto, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instruction. Briefly, 100 μL of CCK-8 solution was added into each chamber and incubated for 120 minutes. Then, cell proliferation was assessed by measuring the absorbance at 450 nm using a Universal Microplate Reader (BIO-TEK Instruments, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Cell apoptosis index was examined via staining with annexin V-conjugated fluorescein isothiocynate (FITC) and propidium iodide (PI) as described in the annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit (Becton Dickinson Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), and flow cytometry analysis (Becton Dickinson FACScan, Mount View, VA, USA). Flow cytometry results were analyzed by Cell Quest Pro software (Becton Dickinson).

In vivo experiments

In vivo experimental set-up

The animal protocol was approved by our Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Female nu/nu mice at 4-6 weeks of age were used to generate the tumor model. A suspension of 1 × 107 Bcap-37 cells in 100 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was injected subcutaneously into the unilateral back of each mouse to initiate a breast cancer mass (Figure 2). Within two weeks, the tumor masses grew to approximately 5 mm in diameter. A 0.032-inch MRIHG was inserted through the center of each tumor for local heating, while a 2.7-mm micro-thermometry fiber was placed parallel to the MRIHG for instant measurement of the MRIHG-mediated RF heating at the target tumor (Figure 2).
Figure 2

(A) In vivo experimental set-up for radiofrequency heat (RFH) of a xenograft tumor (circle) implanted in a nude mouse. Trans-tumor insertion of a 0.032-inch magnetic resonance imaging-heating-guidewire (MRIHG) is performed (open arrow). The radiofrequency-heated tumor is maintained at 42 °C by instantly measuring the temperature with a micro-figure thermometry wire (solid arrow), which is placed parallel to the MRIHG within the tumor. (B) Pathological study with hematoxylin and eosin staining confirms the successful generation of a breast xenograft tumor (400 × magnification).

RFH-enhanced chemotherapy

Twenty-four mice bearing human breast cancer xenograft tumors were randomly stratified to four study groups (6 mice per group) with receiving different intratumoral treatments: (i) PBS (control), (ii) RFH-only (42 °C for 20 minutes via the MRIHG), (iii) chemo-only (intratumoral injection of 10-mg/kg doxorubicin), or (iv) combination therapy (chemo plus RFH).

MRI follow-up

Mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal delivery of 4% chloral hydrate (0.01 mL/g) for MRI follow-up. MRI was performed using a 3.0-Tesla MR scanner (GE Healthcare Corporation, New York, USA) by placing the mouse into a 100 mm-diameter micro-imaging coil. MRI was acquired before and at days 7 and 14 after treatment. T1-weighted images (T1WI) and 0.2-mmol/kg gadodiamide-enhanced T1WI (Omniscan, GE Healthcare) were acquired using a rapid acquisition with OAx T1 550 Spin Echo sequence: TR/TE = 550 ms/15 ms, field of view = 8 cm, matrix = 256 × 256, section thickness = 1.5 mm, intersection gap = 0.5 mm, NEX = 2; and total scan time = 3 minutes and 31 seconds.

Pathological confirmation

After satisfactory MRI, mice were euthanized by 5% CO2 and the tumor masses were harvested. We then estimated the volume of each mass using the following formula: tumor volume = (length × width × width)/2 14. Owing to inevitable variation in tumor size at the beginning of treatment, relative tumor volume (RTV) was used for tumor growth comparison. RTV was calculated using the following formula: RTV = TVn/TV0, where TVn was the tumor volume at day n and TV0 was the tumor volume at day 0 7. The harvested tumor tissues were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 5-mm slices. After de-waxing and hydration with a gradient ethanol series (100%, 95%, 90%, 80%, and 70%), tissue slices were stained with the in situ Cell Death Detection Kit Fluorescein (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and then exposed to freshly-prepared proteinase K working solution for 15-30 minutes at 37 ℃ (10-20 μg/mL in 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4-8). After washing with PBS, slices were incubated in 50 mL of TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end-labeling) reaction mixture for 60 minutes in dark and humidified environment. They were again washed with PBS and sealed with Prolong Gold Antifade Reagent after staining with 4', 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) overnight. All slides were examined with a fluorescent microscope (Leica, Solms, Germany). The number of apoptotic cells was counted by Image-Pro Plus 6 software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (IBM, Armonk, New York, USA). Data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the average cell proliferation rate, cell apoptosis index, tumor volume, and RTV. Differences among the four study groups were considered statistically significant at p <0.05.

Results

RFH-enhanced chemotherapeutic efficiency in breast cancer cells

In vitro combination therapy significantly decreased breast cancer cell proliferation (0.62 ± 0.04 vs. 1.19 ± 0.02 vs. 1.00 ± 0.07 vs. 0.71 ± 0.07, p < 0.05) while increased their apoptosis index (55.37 ± 13.99% vs. 1.61± 0.53% vs. 3.32 ± 0.61% vs. 43.32 ± 15.47%, p < 0.05), compared to the other three treatment groups (controls, RFH-only, and chemo-only, respectively; Figure 3).
Figure 3

(A) Cell proliferation assay demonstrates that the proliferation of cells treated with combination therapy (chemo plus radiofrequency heat [RFH]) is significantly reduced compared to those receiving other treatments. (B) Representative results of apoptosis assay via flow cytometry. (C) Apoptosis assay shows a higher average apoptosis index in cells treated with combination therapy (chemo+RFH) compared to those receiving other treatments (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001).

RFH-enhanced chemotherapy for breast cancer xenograft models

MRI demonstrated a significant tumor size reduction in mice treated with combination therapy compared to those receiving control, RFH-only, and chemo-only treatments in vivo (Figure 4). Such result was confirmed by subsequent pathological examination (Figure 5). The average RTV in the combination treatment group was significantly smaller than those of the control, RFH-only, and chemo-only groups (0.86 ± 0.50 vs. 4.46 ± 1.16 vs. 2.85 ± 1.54 vs. 2.01 ± 0.33, respectively, p < 0.05; Figure 5). The number of apoptosis cells and average apoptosis index in the combination therapy group were significantly higher than those in other three groups (37.02 ± 11.25% vs. 9.80 ± 4.22% vs. 9.04 ± 8.50% vs. 23.29 ± 10.92%, p < 0.05; Figure 6).
Figure 4

T1-weighted images (T1WI) of mice bearing breast cancer xenografts in all four treatment groups, demonstrating homogeneous hypointense tumor masses (arrows) on the animals' unilateral back. The tumor masses become hyperintense after intravenous administration of gadolinium (enhanced T1WI). The follow-up imaging of tumor growth at different time points shows that tumor size in the chemo plus radiofrequency heat (RFH) group (s-x) clearly decreases at week 2 after treatment (arrow on x), in comparison to those in the control (a-f), RFH-only (g-l), and chemo-only (m-r) groups.

Figure 5

(A) Representative pathology of the tumor masses harvested from the four study groups further confirm the size reduction of tumor masses in mice receiving combination therapy with chemo plus radiofrequency heat (RFH). (B) Comparison of the relative tumor volume among the four treatment shows that RFH-enhanced chemotherapy significantly inhibits tumor growth at week 2 post-treatment.

Figure 6

(A) Apoptosis assay demonstrates more apoptosis cells (green dots) in the combination therapy group (Chemo+RFH) than in other three groups, which is further confirmed by analysis of the apoptosis index, showing higher apoptosis index with combination treatment compared to other treatments (B) (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01).

Discussion

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women worldwide. Although chemotherapy and hormone treatments have improved patient survival, ineffective chemotherapy remains a clinical problem owing to the disease's significant heterogeneity with different histologic components, gene-expression profiles, and mutational patterns 15. Systemic administration of chemotherapy is conventional, but current technology does not guarantee sufficient accumulation of chemotherapeutic agents at the target tumors, whereas toxicities to other vital organs remain with systemic delivery 2, 16. Recent developments of minimally-invasive interventional radiology technologies have significantly improved cancer management, including that of breast cancer 17, 18. Under the guidance of imaging, one can precisely place the interventional devices to the target tumors, thereby delivering highly concentrated therapeutics to the targets. Such local approaches can avoid the systemic administration of chemotherapeutic agents and thus minimize toxicity to other organs 19, 20. In the present study, we attempted to overcome the disadvantages of systemic chemotherapy for breast cancer by developing a novel interventional therapeutic approach that combined the benefits of multiple modalities including RF technology, interventional oncology, and chemotherapy. Our in vitro and in vivo results demonstrated that RFH could significantly improve the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agent (doxorubicin) in human breast cancer cells and that intratumorally delivered RFH could significantly enhance local chemotherapy for breast cancer. The mechanisms underlying RFH-enhanced chemotherapy might include heating to fracture tissue, increasing permeability of the cytoplasmic membrane, increasing cellular metabolism, and increasing the activity of heat shock proteins 21. In addition, RFH itself may also impair the drug efflux ability of cancer cells. All these mechanisms facilitate the entrance of therapeutics into targeted tumor cells for effective destruction of tumor tissues, and thereby improve therapeutic outcome. In addition, our novel technique potentially allows simultaneous intratumoral delivery of both chemotherapeutic agents and RFH, which might benefit conventional radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of tumors. RFA has become an important therapeutic tool for the treatment of unresectable tumors 22. However, its application is limited in tumor masses that are in close proximity to normal structures prone to thermal injury, such as the vasculatures 23. Furthermore, incomplete ablation often occurs at the tumor margins due to either decreased RFA heat by neighboring blood flows or irregularly shaped tumor masses being too large to be completely covered by the RFA electrode field 24. Ultimately, such drawbacks of incomplete ablation often result in recurrences of RFA-treated tumors. A combination of RFH-enhanced local chemotherapy and intratumoral RFA may provide the opportunity of using RFA-associated peritumor hyperthermia to specifically enhance chemo-destruction of the tumor margins while avoiding RFA-related thermal injuries to the normal structures adjacent to the RFA-treated tumor masses 25, 26. Further efforts are required to determine whether this novel combination therapy approach can increase endpoint survival and to validate this new technique in different tumor models with optimization of administered regimens. Bcap-37 cells were relatively fast growing breast cancer cells, and thus we had to limit our follow-up time up to two weeks after the treatments. This was because longer follow-up period would result in the xenograft tumor masses, especially in the control animal group, becoming more than ten percent of the body weight, which was not approved by our Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Thus, as a limitation, this study did not allow us to evaluate the long-term therapeutic effects with follow-up MRI. In conclusion, the results of our study indicated that RFH might enhance the therapeutic efficacy of intratumorally delivered chemotherapy for breast cancer, thus establishing the groundwork for future development of interventional molecular image-guided local chemotherapy for breast malignancy using RF technology-integrated interventional oncology and chemotherapy.
  26 in total

Review 1.  Principles of and advances in percutaneous ablation.

Authors:  Muneeb Ahmed; Christopher L Brace; Fred T Lee; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Heating cancer stem cells to reduce tumor relapse.

Authors:  Pier Giuseppe Pelicci; Paola Dalton; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 3.  Luminal breast cancer: from biology to treatment.

Authors:  Michail Ignatiadis; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Percutaneous local ablation of unifocal subclinical breast cancer: clinical experience and preliminary results of cryotherapy.

Authors:  Guglielmo Manenti; Tommaso Perretta; Eleonora Gaspari; Chiara A Pistolese; Lia Scarano; Elsa Cossu; Elena Bonanno; Oreste C Buonomo; Giuseppe Petrella; Giovanni Simonetti; Salvatore Masala
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  New trends in the multidisciplinary treatment of liver tumors.

Authors:  Marcello Donati; Francesco Basile
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 6.  Synergy in cancer treatment between liposomal chemotherapeutics and thermal ablation.

Authors:  Muneeb Ahmed; Marwan Moussa; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Chem Phys Lipids       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.329

7.  Microwave ablation in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Zhigang Wei; Xin Ye; Xia Yang; Aimin Zheng; Guanghui Huang; Wenhong Li; Xiang Ni; Jiao Wang; Xiaoying Han
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Growth and metastasis of tumor cells isolated from a human renal cell carcinoma implanted into different organs of nude mice.

Authors:  S Naito; A C von Eschenbach; R Giavazzi; I J Fidler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Intrabiliary RF heat-enhanced local chemotherapy of a cholangiocarcinoma cell line: monitoring with dual-modality imaging--preclinical study.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Thomas Le; Xia Wu; Han Wang; Tong Zhang; Yanfeng Meng; Baojie Wei; Stephanie S Soriano; Patrick Willis; Orpheus Kolokythas; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Diffusion-weighted MRI monitoring of pancreatic cancer response to radiofrequency heat-enhanced intratumor chemotherapy.

Authors:  Tong Zhang; Feng Zhang; Yanfeng Meng; Han Wang; Thomas Le; Baojie Wei; Donghoon Lee; Patrick Willis; Baozhong Shen; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.044

View more
  9 in total

1.  Combined treatment of cholangiocarcinoma with interventional radiofrequency hyperthermia and heat shock protein promoter-mediated HSV-TK gene therapy.

Authors:  Jingfeng Luo; Jiali Zhou; Fengnan Xie; Yali Zhu; Fei Zhou; Shuanglin Zhang; Shaojie Jiang; Jie He; Jiaxin Liu; Xia Wu; Yanhua Zhang; Jihong Sun; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 2.  Radiofrequency ablation-combined multimodel therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status.

Authors:  Lumin Chen; Jihong Sun; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 8.679

3.  Radiofrequency heat-enhanced direct intratumoral chemotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xia Wu; Feng Zhang; Peng Hu; Lumin Chen; Guocan Han; Weixian Bai; Jingfeng Luo; Ran Chen; Yurong Zhou; Jihong Sun; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Correlation Between Doppler Ultrasound Blood Flow Parameters and Angiogenesis and Proliferation Activity in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jiacheng Niu; Junxia Ma; Xiangzhen Guan; Xin Zhao; Peiyong Li; Meihua Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-09-19

5.  Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Stage B1 Intermediate Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Furong Liu; Minshan Chen; Jie Mei; Li Xu; Rongping Guo; Xiaojun Lin; Yaojun Zhang; Zhenwei Peng
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 6.  Molecular Imaging-Guided Interventional Hyperthermia in Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Yurong Zhou; Jihong Sun; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Radiofrequency hyperthermia promotes the therapeutic effects on chemotherapeutic-resistant breast cancer when combined with heat shock protein promoter-controlled HSV-TK gene therapy: Toward imaging-guided interventional gene therapy.

Authors:  Jingfeng Luo; Xiaotian Wu; Fei Zhou; Yurong Zhou; Tongchun Huang; Fei Liu; Guocan Han; Luming Chen; Weixian Bai; Xia Wu; Jihong Sun; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-04

8.  Orthotopic hepatic cancer: radiofrequency hyperthermia-enhanced intratumoral herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase gene therapy.

Authors:  Fu Xiong; Feng Zhang; Yin Jin; Qiaoyou Weng; Jingjing Song; Guofeng Zhou; David Shin; Chuansheng Zheng; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-22

Review 9.  Using magnetic particle imaging systems to localize and guide magnetic hyperthermia treatment: tracers, hardware, and future medical applications.

Authors:  Prashant Chandrasekharan; Zhi Wei Tay; Daniel Hensley; Xinyi Y Zhou; Barry Kl Fung; Caylin Colson; Yao Lu; Benjamin D Fellows; Quincy Huynh; Chinmoy Saayujya; Elaine Yu; Ryan Orendorff; Bo Zheng; Patrick Goodwill; Carlos Rinaldi; Steven Conolly
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 11.600

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.