| Literature DB >> 25249950 |
Ben Engelhard1, Eilon Vaadia1.
Abstract
Gamma oscillations in cortex have been extensively studied with relation to behavior in both humans and animal models; however, their computational role in the processing of behaviorally relevant signals is still not clear. One oft-overlooked characteristic of gamma oscillations is their spatial distribution over the cortical space and the computational consequences of such an organization. Here, we advance the proposal that the spatial organization of gamma oscillations is of major importance for their function. The interaction of specific spatial distributions of oscillations with the functional topography of cortex enables select amplification of neuronal signals, which supports perceptual and cognitive processing.Entities:
Keywords: cortical computation; functional topography; gamma oscillations; phase coding; temporal synchrony
Year: 2014 PMID: 25249950 PMCID: PMC4158807 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Syst Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5137
Figure 1Relationship between oscillation strength, single neuron synchrony, and oscillatory properties across the cortical space. (A) Probability of N recorded units to fire together in a 5 ms bin with N shown in each frame, for N = 3 to N = 6. This probability was calculated separately for five periods of increasing power of low-gamma oscillations (30–43 Hz), shown on the x axis. Error bars are SEM. The size of synchronized ensembles increased with the amplitude of oscillations. (B) Mean ± SEM of the depth of modulation of the cross-correlation histograms for five periods of increasing power of oscillations (30–43 Hz), shown on the x axis. Data are from pairs that exhibited significantly increased depth of modulation in segments of high oscillation power. The depth of modulation is a measure of the strength of pairwise neuronal interactions. (C) Histogram of the preferred phases of firing for all single units in segments of high oscillation power. Counts of significant preferred phases are marked in black (Raleigh test, p < 0.0001 with Bonferroni correction). 63.6% of the 218 single units had a significant preferred firing phase. Note the tight temporal clustering of the preferred phases of firing. (D) Mean correlations of the instantaneous amplitude of 30–43 Hz oscillations of LFP between all sites and sites conditioned for an increase in power (circled in white). Data are from one recording day and for segments of high oscillation power. Note the spatial distribution of oscillations (which is not circular) and high correlations near the conditioned sites. The recording array was 4 × 4 mm and had 400 μm interelectrode spacing. Black squares are non-recording electrodes. (E) Mean circular correlations between the instantaneous 30–43 Hz phase in all sites and sites conditioned for an increase in power (circled in white). Data are the same as in (D). (F) Cumulative distribution of mean absolute time differences between phases of the oscillations in the conditioned sites for segments of high oscillation power. Data are the same as in (D). Note the small time differences for the majority of the segments. Panels (A–C) adapted from Engelhard et al. (2013).
Figure 2Spatial distribution of gamma activity across the cortical space in V1. (A) Topographical distribution of the sustained gamma oscillations (30–70 Hz) at the different stimulus locations tested (indicated on the right). (B) Topographical distribution of the first negative component of the evoked potential, for the same stimuli, at 64 ms. Note the stimulus-dependent spatial distribution of the gamma oscillations and evoked component. ECoG was recorded using an implanted array with 3 mm interelectrode spacing. Figure reproduced with permission from Rols et al. (2001).