Literature DB >> 25249636

Impact of introducing an electronic physiological surveillance system on hospital mortality.

Paul E Schmidt1, Paul Meredith2, David R Prytherch3, Duncan Watson4, Valerie Watson5, Roger M Killen6, Peter Greengross7, Mohammed A Mohammed8, Gary B Smith9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Avoidable hospital mortality is often attributable to inadequate patient vital signs monitoring, and failure to recognise or respond to clinical deterioration. The processes involved with vital sign collection and charting; their integration, interpretation and analysis; and the delivery of decision support regarding subsequent clinical care are subject to potential error and/or failure.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether introducing an electronic physiological surveillance system (EPSS), specifically designed to improve the collection and clinical use of vital signs data, reduced hospital mortality.
METHODS: A pragmatic, retrospective, observational study of seasonally adjusted in-hospital mortality rates in three main hospital specialties was undertaken before, during and after the sequential deployment and ongoing use of a hospital-wide EPSS in two large unconnected acute general hospitals in England. The EPSS, which uses wireless handheld computing devices, replaced a paper-based vital sign charting and clinical escalation system.
RESULTS: During EPSS implementation, crude mortality fell from a baseline of 7.75% (2168/27,959) to 6.42% (1904/29,676) in one hospital (estimated 397 fewer deaths), and from 7.57% (1648/21,771) to 6.15% (1614/26,241) at the second (estimated 372 fewer deaths). At both hospitals, multiyear statistical process control analyses revealed abrupt and sustained mortality reductions, coincident with the deployment and increasing use of the system. The cumulative total of excess deaths reduced in all specialties with increasing use of the system across the hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of technology specifically designed to improve the accuracy, reliability and availability of patients' vital signs and early warning scores, and thereby the recognition of and response to patient deterioration, is associated with reduced mortality in this study. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events, epidemiology and detection; Control charts, run charts; Decision support, computerized; Information technology; Mortality (standardized mortality ratios)

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25249636     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  31 in total

1.  What's new with rapid response systems?

Authors:  Daryl Jones; Anne Lippert; Michael DeVita; Ken Hillman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  NICE guidance on sepsis is of limited value in postoperative colorectal patients: the scores that cry 'wolf!'

Authors:  Pjj Herrod; M Cox; H Keevil; Kje Smith; J N Lund
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Rapid Response Systems 20 Years Later: New Approaches, Old Challenges.

Authors:  Christopher P Bonafide; Damian Roland; Patrick W Brady
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 16.193

4.  Reliable Collection of Real-Time Patient Physiologic Data from less Reliable Networks: a "Monitor of Monitors" System (MoMs).

Authors:  Peter F Hu; Shiming Yang; Hsiao-Chi Li; Lynn G Stansbury; Fan Yang; George Hagegeorge; Catriona Miller; Peter Rock; Deborah M Stein; Colin F Mackenzie
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 5.  Failure to rescue in surgical patients: A review for acute care surgeons.

Authors:  Justin S Hatchimonji; Elinore J Kaufman; Catherine E Sharoky; Lucy Ma; Anna E Garcia Whitlock; Daniel N Holena
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 6.  Moving From Digitalization to Digitization in Cardiovascular Care: Why Is it Important, and What Could it Mean for Patients and Providers?

Authors:  Steven R Steinhubl; Eric J Topol
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Making sense of the shadows: priorities for creating a learning healthcare system based on routinely collected data.

Authors:  Sarah R Deeny; Adam Steventon
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Early warning scoring systems versus standard observations charts for wards in South Africa: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Una Kyriacos; Jennifer Jelsma; Michael James; Sue Jordan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Prescription Of analgesia in Emergency Medicine (POEM): a multicentre observational survey of pain relief in patients presenting with an isolated limb fracture and/or dislocation.

Authors:  James Robert Sheehan; Sarah Wilson; Jane Quinlan; Sally Beer; Melanie Darwent; Jack R Dainty; Martyn Ezra; Liza Keating
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2019-06-21

10.  SEND: a system for electronic notification and documentation of vital sign observations.

Authors:  David Wong; Timothy Bonnici; Julia Knight; Lauren Morgan; Paul Coombes; Peter Watkinson
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.