Literature DB >> 25249628

MACE: model based analysis of ChIP-exo.

Liguo Wang1, Junsheng Chen2, Chen Wang3, Liis Uusküla-Reimand4, Kaifu Chen5, Alejandra Medina-Rivera4, Edwin J Young4, Michael T Zimmermann3, Huihuang Yan3, Zhifu Sun3, Yuji Zhang3, Stephen T Wu3, Haojie Huang6, Michael D Wilson7, Jean-Pierre A Kocher8, Wei Li9.   

Abstract

Understanding the role of a given transcription factor (TF) in regulating gene expression requires precise mapping of its binding sites in the genome. Chromatin immunoprecipitation-exo, an emerging technique using λ exonuclease to digest TF unbound DNA after ChIP, is designed to reveal transcription factor binding site (TFBS) boundaries with near-single nucleotide resolution. Although ChIP-exo promises deeper insights into transcription regulation, no dedicated bioinformatics tool exists to leverage its advantages. Most ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip analytic methods are not tailored for ChIP-exo, and thus cannot take full advantage of high-resolution ChIP-exo data. Here we describe a novel analysis framework, termed MACE (model-based analysis of ChIP-exo) dedicated to ChIP-exo data analysis. The MACE workflow consists of four steps: (i) sequencing data normalization and bias correction; (ii) signal consolidation and noise reduction; (iii) single-nucleotide resolution border peak detection using the Chebyshev Inequality and (iv) border matching using the Gale-Shapley stable matching algorithm. When applied to published human CTCF, yeast Reb1 and our own mouse ONECUT1/HNF6 ChIP-exo data, MACE is able to define TFBSs with high sensitivity, specificity and spatial resolution, as evidenced by multiple criteria including motif enrichment, sequence conservation, direct sequence pileup, nucleosome positioning and open chromatin states. In addition, we show that the fundamental advance of MACE is the identification of two boundaries of a TFBS with high resolution, whereas other methods only report a single location of the same event. The two boundaries help elucidate the in vivo binding structure of a given TF, e.g. whether the TF may bind as dimers or in a complex with other co-factors.
© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25249628      PMCID: PMC4227761          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  34 in total

1.  TileMap: create chromosomal map of tiling array hybridizations.

Authors:  Hongkai Ji; Wing Hung Wong
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  F-Seq: a feature density estimator for high-throughput sequence tags.

Authors:  Alan P Boyle; Justin Guinney; Gregory E Crawford; Terrence S Furey
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Mapping of transcription factor binding regions in mammalian cells by ChIP: comparison of array- and sequencing-based technologies.

Authors:  Ghia M Euskirchen; Joel S Rozowsky; Chia-Lin Wei; Wah Heng Lee; Zhengdong D Zhang; Stephen Hartman; Olof Emanuelsson; Viktor Stolc; Sherman Weissman; Mark B Gerstein; Yijun Ruan; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Mechanisms that specify promoter nucleosome location and identity.

Authors:  Paul D Hartley; Hiten D Madhani
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  FindPeaks 3.1: a tool for identifying areas of enrichment from massively parallel short-read sequencing technology.

Authors:  Anthony P Fejes; Gordon Robertson; Mikhail Bilenky; Richard Varhol; Matthew Bainbridge; Steven J M Jones
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  An integrated software system for analyzing ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq data.

Authors:  Hongkai Ji; Hui Jiang; Wenxiu Ma; David S Johnson; Richard M Myers; Wing H Wong
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Genome-wide identification of in vivo protein-DNA binding sites from ChIP-Seq data.

Authors:  Raja Jothi; Suresh Cuddapah; Artem Barski; Kairong Cui; Keji Zhao
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Modeling ChIP sequencing in silico with applications.

Authors:  Zhengdong D Zhang; Joel Rozowsky; Michael Snyder; Joseph Chang; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  The insulator binding protein CTCF positions 20 nucleosomes around its binding sites across the human genome.

Authors:  Yutao Fu; Manisha Sinha; Craig L Peterson; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS).

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Tao Liu; Clifford A Meyer; Jérôme Eeckhoute; David S Johnson; Bradley E Bernstein; Chad Nusbaum; Richard M Myers; Myles Brown; Wei Li; X Shirley Liu
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  41 in total

1.  GENE REGULATION. Discrete functions of nuclear receptor Rev-erbα couple metabolism to the clock.

Authors:  Yuxiang Zhang; Bin Fang; Matthew J Emmett; Manashree Damle; Zheng Sun; Dan Feng; Sean M Armour; Jarrett R Remsberg; Jennifer Jager; Raymond E Soccio; David J Steger; Mitchell A Lazar
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The ChIP-exo Method: Identifying Protein-DNA Interactions with Near Base Pair Precision.

Authors:  Andrea A Perreault; Bryan J Venters
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Characterizing protein-DNA binding event subtypes in ChIP-exo data.

Authors:  Naomi Yamada; William K M Lai; Nina Farrell; B Franklin Pugh; Shaun Mahony
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  TMPRSS2-ERG Controls Luminal Epithelial Lineage and Antiandrogen Sensitivity in PTEN and TP53-Mutated Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Alexandra M Blee; Yundong He; Yinhui Yang; Zhenqing Ye; Yuqian Yan; Yunqian Pan; Tao Ma; Joseph Dugdale; Emily Kuehn; Manish Kohli; Rafael Jimenez; Yu Chen; Wanhai Xu; Liguo Wang; Haojie Huang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Protein-DNA binding in high-resolution.

Authors:  Shaun Mahony; B Franklin Pugh
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 8.250

6.  ChIP-exo analysis highlights Fkh1 and Fkh2 transcription factors as hubs that integrate multi-scale networks in budding yeast.

Authors:  Thierry D G A Mondeel; Petter Holland; Jens Nielsen; Matteo Barberis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Data exploration, quality control and statistical analysis of ChIP-exo/nexus experiments.

Authors:  Rene Welch; Dongjun Chung; Jeffrey Grass; Robert Landick; Sündüz Keles
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 8.  Insights from resolving protein-DNA interactions at near base-pair resolution.

Authors:  Bryan J Venters
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Base-pair resolution detection of transcription factor binding site by deep deconvolutional network.

Authors:  Sirajul Salekin; Jianqiu Michelle Zhang; Yufei Huang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Transcription factor Sp2 potentiates binding of the TALE homeoproteins Pbx1:Prep1 and the histone-fold domain protein Nf-y to composite genomic sites.

Authors:  Sara Völkel; Bastian Stielow; Florian Finkernagel; Dana Berger; Thorsten Stiewe; Andrea Nist; Guntram Suske
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.