Literature DB >> 25248101

Intentional attention switching in dichotic listening: exploring the efficiency of nonspatial and spatial selection.

Vera Lawo1, Janina Fels, Josefa Oberem, Iring Koch.   

Abstract

Using an auditory variant of task switching, we examined the ability to intentionally switch attention in a dichotic-listening task. In our study, participants responded selectively to one of two simultaneously presented auditory number words (spoken by a female and a male, one for each ear) by categorizing its numerical magnitude. The mapping of gender (female vs. male) and ear (left vs. right) was unpredictable. The to-be-attended feature for gender or ear, respectively, was indicated by a visual selection cue prior to auditory stimulus onset. In Experiment 1, explicitly cued switches of the relevant feature dimension (e.g., from gender to ear) and switches of the relevant feature within a dimension (e.g., from male to female) occurred in an unpredictable manner. We found large performance costs when the relevant feature switched, but switches of the relevant feature dimension incurred only small additional costs. The feature-switch costs were larger in ear-relevant than in gender-relevant trials. In Experiment 2, we replicated these findings using a simplified design (i.e., only within-dimension switches with blocked dimensions). In Experiment 3, we examined preparation effects by manipulating the cueing interval and found a preparation benefit only when ear was cued. Together, our data suggest that the large part of attentional switch costs arises from reconfiguration at the level of relevant auditory features (e.g., left vs. right) rather than feature dimensions (ear vs. gender). Additionally, our findings suggest that ear-based target selection benefits more from preparation time (i.e., time to direct attention to one ear) than gender-based target selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory task switching; Dichotic listening; Preparation; Selective attention; Switch costs

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25248101     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.898079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  5 in total

1.  Cross-modal transfer after auditory task-switching training.

Authors:  Florian Kattner; Larissa Samaan; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

2.  Neural Switch Asymmetry in Feature-Based Auditory Attention Tasks.

Authors:  Susan A McLaughlin; Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-23

Review 3.  An Extended Binaural Real-Time Auralization System With an Interface to Research Hearing Aids for Experiments on Subjects With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Florian Pausch; Lukas Aspöck; Michael Vorländer; Janina Fels
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  The Effects of Switching Non-Spatial Attention During Conversational Turn Taking.

Authors:  Gaven Lin; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effects of Spatial Speech Presentation on Listener Response Strategy for Talker-Identification.

Authors:  Stefan Uhrig; Andrew Perkis; Sebastian Möller; U Peter Svensson; Dawn M Behne
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.