Natalia Pedersen1, Peter Thielsen, Lars Martinsen, Mette Bennedsen, Anne Haaber, Ebbe Langholz, Zsuzsanna Végh, Dana Duricova, Tine Jess, Sally Bell, Johan Burisch, Pia Munkholm. 1. *Gastroenterology Unit, Herlev University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; †Department of Gastroenterology, Nykoebing Falster Hospital, Nykoebing Falster, Denmark; ‡Department of Gastroenterology, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Frederikssund, Denmark; §Department of Gastroenterology, Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark; ‖IBD Clinical and Research Center, ISCARE a. s., Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; ¶Department of Epidemiology Research, States Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark; and **Department of Gastroenterology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To individualize treatment with mesalazine for ulcerative colitis relapses through a self-managed, web-based solution to optimize the short-term disease course. METHODS: Prospective, open-label, web-guided study with 3 months mesalazine therapy among patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Once a week, patients completed the simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI) and registered fecal calprotectin (FC) on the web application: www.meza.constant-care.dk. SCCAI and FC were summed and resulted in a total inflammatory burden score (TIBS). Deep remission was defined as SCCAI ≤1; FC = 0, and TIBS ≤1. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients (62% females; median age 45 yr) were included in the study and allocated 4.8 g mesalazine per day. Of these, 82 (86%) patients were adherent to web therapy, completing 3 months of web-guided mesalazine therapy. Of the 82 adherent patients, 72 (88%) continued mesalazine and 10 (12%) needed rescue therapy. From weeks 0 to 12, patients had experienced a significant reduction in mean SCCAI (4.6 versus 1.6, P < 0.001), mean FC (437 versus 195, P < 0.001), and mean TIBS (6.7 versus 2.4, P < 0.001). Based on TIBS values (≤1), the dose of mesalazine was reduced to 2.4 g in 25% of patients at week 3 in 50% of subjects at week 5 and in 88% of patients at week 12. CONCLUSIONS: Web-guided therapy with mesalazine in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis helps to individualize the dose and improve adherence to therapy. The study confirms mesalazine efficacy in mild-to-moderate UC, significantly improving TIBS values in majority of the patients.
BACKGROUND: To individualize treatment with mesalazine for ulcerative colitis relapses through a self-managed, web-based solution to optimize the short-term disease course. METHODS: Prospective, open-label, web-guided study with 3 months mesalazine therapy among patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Once a week, patients completed the simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI) and registered fecal calprotectin (FC) on the web application: www.meza.constant-care.dk. SCCAI and FC were summed and resulted in a total inflammatory burden score (TIBS). Deep remission was defined as SCCAI ≤1; FC = 0, and TIBS ≤1. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients (62% females; median age 45 yr) were included in the study and allocated 4.8 g mesalazine per day. Of these, 82 (86%) patients were adherent to web therapy, completing 3 months of web-guided mesalazine therapy. Of the 82 adherent patients, 72 (88%) continued mesalazine and 10 (12%) needed rescue therapy. From weeks 0 to 12, patients had experienced a significant reduction in mean SCCAI (4.6 versus 1.6, P < 0.001), mean FC (437 versus 195, P < 0.001), and mean TIBS (6.7 versus 2.4, P < 0.001). Based on TIBS values (≤1), the dose of mesalazine was reduced to 2.4 g in 25% of patients at week 3 in 50% of subjects at week 5 and in 88% of patients at week 12. CONCLUSIONS: Web-guided therapy with mesalazine in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis helps to individualize the dose and improve adherence to therapy. The study confirms mesalazine efficacy in mild-to-moderate UC, significantly improving TIBS values in majority of the patients.
Authors: Anna Testa; Fabiana Castiglione; Olga Maria Nardone; Giorgio L Colombo Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Natalia Pedersen; Dorit Vedel Ankersen; Maria Felding; Henrik Wachmann; Zsuzsanna Végh; Line Molzen; Johan Burisch; Jens Rikardt Andersen; Pia Munkholm Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2017-05-14 Impact factor: 5.742