Literature DB >> 25247970

Craniocaudal retroperitoneal node length as a risk factor for relapse from clinical stage I testicular germ cell tumor.

Stephanie A Howard1, Kathryn P Gray, Elizabeth K O'Donnell, Fiona M Fennessy, Clair J Beard, Christopher J Sweeney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether retroperitoneal craniocaudal nodal length or nodal volume predicts relapse risk in stage I testicular cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 826 testicular cancer patients. Of these 826 patients, 118 had stage I disease and either less than 2 years of surveillance or retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with no adjuvant chemotherapy. These patients formed our analytic cohort, and 3D nodal volumes and craniocaudal nodal length were measured. Association between relapse risk and craniocaudal nodal length and nodal volume was evaluated using univariable or multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for known prognostic factors.
RESULTS: Sixty-six (56%) of 118 patients had nonseminomatous germ cell tumor and 52 (44%) had seminomatous germ cell tumor. Craniocaudal nodal length proved to be an independent risk factor in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors using a multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for other potential known risk factors of embryonal predominance and lymphovascular invasion. For every 3-mm increase in craniocaudal nodal length, the risk of relapse increased by 52% (odds ratio [OR], 1.52; 95% CI, 1.03-2.25). For patients with seminomas, only primary tumor size was an independent risk factor for relapse (1.34, 1.02-1.75).
CONCLUSION: In nonseminomatous germ cell tumors, craniocaudal nodal length was shown to be associated with increased risk of relapse independently of other known risk factors. If validated in an independent cohort, craniocaudal nodal length could provide important additional information to inform management decisions in these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  craniocaudal; craniocaudal lymph nodes; retroperitoneal; testicular cancer; testis cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25247970     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  4 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in patients with clinical stage I nonseminoma-beyond lymphovascular invasion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Friedemann Zengerling; Dirk Beyersdorff; Jonas Busch; Julia Heinzelbecker; David Pfister; Christian Ruf; Christian Winter; Peter Albers; Sabine Kliesch; Stefanie Schmidt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 2.  Clinical dilemmas in local and regional testis cancer.

Authors:  Gregory J Nason; Ricardo A Rendon; Lori Wood; Robert A Huddart; Peter Albers; Lawrence H Einhorn; Craig R Nichols; Christian Kollmannsberger; Lynn Anson-Cartwright; Padraig Warde; Michael A S Jewett; Peter Chung; Philippe L Bedard; Aaron R Hansen; Robert J Hamilton
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  [Follow-up of urological tumor treatment].

Authors:  C-H Ohlmann; P Albers; K Boehm; M Graefen; O W Hakenberg; M Kuczyk; J Graf; I Peters; C Protzel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  A meta-analysis of clinicopathologic features that predict necrosis or fibrosis at post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in individuals receiving treatment for non-seminoma germ cell tumours.

Authors:  Ciara Conduit; Wei Hong; Felicity Martin; Benjamin Thomas; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Jeremy Goad; Peter Grimison; Nariman Ahmadi; Ben Tran; Jeremy Lewin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 5.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.