OBJECTIVE: Traditional fat-suppressed T1-weighted spin-echo or turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequences (T1-weighted images) may be degraded by motion and pulsation artifacts in head-and-neck studies. Our purpose is to evaluate the role of a fat-suppressed T1-weighted 3D radial gradient-recalled echo sequence (radial-volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination [VIBE]) in the head and neck as compared with standard contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 21 patients (age range, 9-67 years) who underwent head-and-neck MRI at 1.5 T. Both contrast-enhanced radial-VIBE and conventional fat-suppressed TSE contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging were performed. Two radiologists evaluated multiple parameters of image quality, graded on a 5-point scale. Mixed-model analysis of variance and interobserver variability assessment were performed. RESULTS: The following parameters were scored as significantly better for the contrast-enhanced radial-VIBE sequence than for conventional contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging: overall image quality (p < 0.0001), degree of fat suppression (p = 0.006), mucosal enhancement (p = 0.004), muscle edge clarity (p = 0.049), vessel clarity (p < 0.0001), respiratory motion artifact (p = 0.002), pulsation artifact (p < 0.0001), and lesion edge sharpness (p = 0.004). Interobserver agreement in qualitative evaluation of the two sequences showed fair-to-good agreement for the following variables: overall image quality (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.779), degree of fat suppression (ICC, 0.716), mucosal enhancement (ICC, 0.693), muscle edge clarity (ICC, 0.675), respiratory motion artifact (ICC, 0.516), lesion enhancement (ICC, 0.410), and lesion edge sharpness (ICC, 0.538). Excellent agreement was shown for vessel clarity (ICC, 0.846) and pulsation artifact (ICC, 0.808). CONCLUSION: The radial-VIBE sequence is a viable motion-robust improvement on the conventional fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequence.
OBJECTIVE: Traditional fat-suppressed T1-weighted spin-echo or turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequences (T1-weighted images) may be degraded by motion and pulsation artifacts in head-and-neck studies. Our purpose is to evaluate the role of a fat-suppressed T1-weighted 3D radial gradient-recalled echo sequence (radial-volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination [VIBE]) in the head and neck as compared with standard contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 21 patients (age range, 9-67 years) who underwent head-and-neck MRI at 1.5 T. Both contrast-enhanced radial-VIBE and conventional fat-suppressed TSE contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging were performed. Two radiologists evaluated multiple parameters of image quality, graded on a 5-point scale. Mixed-model analysis of variance and interobserver variability assessment were performed. RESULTS: The following parameters were scored as significantly better for the contrast-enhanced radial-VIBE sequence than for conventional contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging: overall image quality (p < 0.0001), degree of fat suppression (p = 0.006), mucosal enhancement (p = 0.004), muscle edge clarity (p = 0.049), vessel clarity (p < 0.0001), respiratory motion artifact (p = 0.002), pulsation artifact (p < 0.0001), and lesion edge sharpness (p = 0.004). Interobserver agreement in qualitative evaluation of the two sequences showed fair-to-good agreement for the following variables: overall image quality (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.779), degree of fat suppression (ICC, 0.716), mucosal enhancement (ICC, 0.693), muscle edge clarity (ICC, 0.675), respiratory motion artifact (ICC, 0.516), lesion enhancement (ICC, 0.410), and lesion edge sharpness (ICC, 0.538). Excellent agreement was shown for vessel clarity (ICC, 0.846) and pulsation artifact (ICC, 0.808). CONCLUSION: The radial-VIBE sequence is a viable motion-robust improvement on the conventional fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequence.
Authors: Laura Heacock; Yiming Gao; Samantha L Heller; Amy N Melsaether; James S Babb; Tobias K Block; Ricardo Otazo; Sungheon G Kim; Linda Moy Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 4.813