Literature DB >> 25247954

Reliability of the spinal instability neoplastic scale among radiologists: an assessment of instability secondary to spinal metastases.

Charles G Fisher1, Anne L Versteeg, Rowan Schouten, Stefano Boriani, Peter P Varga, Laurence D Rhines, Manraj K S Heran, Norio Kawahara, Daryl Fourney, Jeremy J Reynolds, Michael G Fehlings, Ziya L Gokaslan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The spinal instability neoplastic scale (SINS) is a new classification system for tumor-related spinal instability. The SINS may prove to be a valuable tool for radiologists to communicate with oncologists and surgeons in a standardized evidence-based manner. The objective of this study was to determine the inter- and intraobserver reliability and validity of the SINS among radiologists.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven radiologists from 10 international sites used the SINS to categorize the degree of spinal instability in 30 patients with spinal tumors. To assess validity, we compared the SINS scores assigned by the radiologists with the SINS scores of 11 spine oncology surgeons (reference standard). Each total SINS score (range, 0-18 points) was converted into one of the following three clinical categories: 0-6 points, stable; 7-12 points, potentially unstable; and 13-18 points, unstable. In addition, each total SINS score was converted into a binary scale: 0-6 points was defined as stable, and 7-18 points was considered a current or possible instability for which surgical consultation is recommended.
RESULTS: Radiologists using the SINS binary scale showed excellent (κ = 0.88) validity, substantial (κ = 0.76) interobserver agreement, and excellent (κ = 0.82) intraobserver reproducibility. Radiologists rated all unstable cases and 621 of 629 (98.7%) potentially unstable cases with a SINS score of 7 or more points, thus appropriately initiating a referral for surgical assessment.
CONCLUSION: SINS is a reliable tool for radiologists rating tumor-related spinal instability. It accurately discriminates between stable and potentially unstable or unstable lesions and, therefore, can guide the need for surgical consultation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  metastasis; neoplasm; radiologist reliability; spinal instability; spinal instability neoplastic scale (SINS); spine; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25247954     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.12269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  23 in total

1.  Patient-reported outcomes after surgical stabilization of spinal tumors: symptom-based validation of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) and surgery.

Authors:  Ibrahim Hussain; Ori Barzilai; Anne S Reiner; Natalie DiStefano; Lily McLaughlin; Shahiba Ogilvie; Mark Bilsky; Ilya Laufer
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 2.  Treatment for Malignant Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas: 5 Years of Progress.

Authors:  Paola Jimenez; Claudio Tatsui; Aaron Jessop; Sonali Thosani; Camilo Jimenez
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  The era of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases and the multidisciplinary management of complex cases.

Authors:  Rachit Kumar; Anick Nater; Ahmed Hashmi; Sten Myrehaug; Young Lee; Lijun Ma; Kristin Redmond; Simon S Lo; Eric L Chang; Albert Yee; Charles G Fisher; Michael G Fehlings; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2015-07-27

Review 4.  Classifications in Brief: The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score.

Authors:  Hamza Murtaza; Connor W Sullivan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Radiofrequency ablation and vertebral augmentation for palliation of painful spinal metastases.

Authors:  Adam N Wallace; Taylor J Greenwood; Jack W Jennings
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Clinical outcome of vertebral compression fracture after single fraction spine radiosurgery for spinal metastases.

Authors:  Isabelle M Germano; Andrea Carai; Puneet Pawha; Seth Blacksburg; Yeh-Chi Lo; Sheryl Green
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 5.150

7.  Can the spinal instability neoplastic score prior to spinal radiosurgery predict compression fractures following stereotactic spinal radiosurgery for metastatic spinal tumor?: a post hoc analysis of prospective phase II single-institution trials.

Authors:  Sun-Ho Lee; Claudio E Tatsui; Amol J Ghia; Behrang Amini; Jing Li; Salvatore M Zavarella; Nizar M Tannir; Paul D Brown; Laurence D Rhines
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  The Effect of Introducing the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score in Routine Clinical Practice for Patients With Spinal Metastases.

Authors:  Anne L Versteeg; Joanne M van der Velden; Helena M Verkooijen; Marco van Vulpen; F Cumhur Oner; Charles G Fisher; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-12-14

9.  Impact of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score on Surgical Referral Patterns and Outcomes.

Authors:  M Dosani; S Lucas; J Wong; L Weir; S Lomas; C Cumayas; C Fisher; S Tyldesley
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Hybrid surgery-radiosurgery therapy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: A prospective evaluation using patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Ori Barzilai; Mary-Kate Amato; Lily McLaughlin; Anne S Reiner; Shahiba Q Ogilvie; Eric Lis; Yoshiya Yamada; Mark H Bilsky; Ilya Laufer
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2017-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.