Literature DB >> 25247950

Nonlinear image blending for dual-energy MDCT of the abdomen: can image quality be preserved if the contrast medium dose is reduced?

Achille Mileto1, Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo, Daniele Marin, Marcela Alfaro-Cordoba, Christian D Eusemann, Emanuele Scribano, Alfredo Blandino, Silvio Mazziotti, Giorgio Ascenti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the image quality of a dual-energy nonlinear image blending technique at reduced load of contrast medium with a simulated 120-kVp linear blending technique at a full dose during portal venous phase MDCT of the abdomen. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients (25 men, 20 women; mean age, 65.6 ± 9.7 [SD] years; mean body weight, 74.9 ± 12.4 kg) underwent contrast-enhanced single-phase dual-energy CT of the abdomen by a random assignment to one of three different contrast medium (iomeprol 400) dose injection protocols: 1.3, 1.0, or 0.65 mL/kg of body weight. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and noise at the portal vein, liver, aorta, and kidney were compared among the different datasets using the ANOVA. Three readers qualitatively assessed all datasets in a blinded and independent fashion.
RESULTS: Nonlinear blended images at a 25% reduced dose allowed a significant improvement in CNR (p < 0.05 for all comparisons), compared with simulated 120-kVp linear blended images at a full dose. No statistically significant difference existed in CNR and noise between the nonlinear blended images at a 50% reduced dose and the simulated 120-kVp linear blended images at a full dose. Nonlinear blended images at a 50% reduced dose were considered in all cases to have acceptable image quality.
CONCLUSION: The dual-energy nonlinear image blending technique allows reducing the dose of contrast medium up to 50% during portal venous phase imaging of the abdomen while preserving image quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MDCT; contrast medium; dual-energy CT; linear blending; nonlinear blending

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25247950     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.12179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  4 in total

1.  Single- and dual-energy CT of the abdomen: comparison of radiation dose and image quality of 2nd and 3rd generation dual-source CT.

Authors:  Julian L Wichmann; Andrew D Hardie; U Joseph Schoepf; Lloyd M Felmly; Jonathan D Perry; Akos Varga-Szemes; Stefanie Mangold; Damiano Caruso; Christian Canstein; Thomas J Vogl; Carlo N De Cecco
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  "How to" incorporate dual-energy imaging into a high volume abdominal imaging practice.

Authors:  Eric P Tamm; Ott Le; Xinming Liu; Rick R Layman; Dianna D Cody; Priya R Bhosale
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-03

3.  Enhanced gray-white matter differentiation on non-enhanced CT using a frequency selective non-linear blending.

Authors:  Georg Bier; Malte Niklas Bongers; Hendrik Ditt; Benjamin Bender; Ulrike Ernemann; Marius Horger
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Advanced abdominal imaging with dual energy CT is feasible without increasing radiation dose.

Authors:  Monika Uhrig; David Simons; Marc Kachelrieß; Francesco Pisana; Stefan Kuchenbecker; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.909

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.