Literature DB >> 25247825

Retrospective review of lung cancers diagnosed in annual rounds of CT screening.

Dong Ming Xu1, Rowena Yip, James P Smith, David F Yankelevitz, Claudia I Henschke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to review the records of patients with diagnoses of lung cancer in annual repeat rounds of CT screening in the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program to determine whether the cancer could have been identified in the previous round of screening.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three radiologists reviewed the scans of 104 lung cancer patients and assigned the findings to one of three categories: 1, cancer was not visible at previous CT screening; 2, cancer was visible at previous CT screening but not identified; 3, abnormality was identified at previous CT screening but not classified as malignant. Nodule size, nodule consistency, cell type, and stage at the previous screening and when identified for further workup for each of the three categories were tabulated.
RESULTS: Twenty-four (23%) patients had category 1 findings; 56 (54%) category 2; and 24 (23%) category 3. When diagnosed, seven (29%) category 1, 10 (18%) category 2, and four (17%) category three cancers had progressed beyond stage I. All cancers seen in retrospect were in clinical stage I at the previous screening. Category 1 cancers, compared with categories 2 and 3, had faster growth rates, were less frequently adenocarcinomas (29% vs 54% and 67%, p = 0.01), and were more often small cell carcinomas (29% vs 14% and 12%, p = 0.12).
CONCLUSION: Lung cancers found on annual repeat screenings were frequently identified in the previous round of screening, suggesting that review of the varied appearance and incorporation of advanced image display may be useful for earlier detection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT screening; early detection; lung cancer; lung cancer growth; small lung cancers

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25247825     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.12115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  Semi-automated volumetric analysis in the NELSON trial for lung cancer screening: is there room for diagnostic experience yet?

Authors:  Giuseppe Bronte; Christian Rolfo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Lung nodule and cancer detection in computed tomography screening.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Rubin
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 3.  Risk factors assessment and risk prediction models in lung cancer screening candidates.

Authors:  Mariusz Adamek; Ewa Wachuła; Sylwia Szabłowska-Siwik; Agnieszka Boratyn-Nowicka; Damian Czyżewski
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

Review 4.  The importance of the regimen of screening in maximizing the benefit and minimizing the harms.

Authors:  Claudia I Henschke; Kunwei Li; Rowena Yip; Mary Salvatore; David F Yankelevitz
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

5.  Malignancy risk estimation of pulmonary nodules in screening CTs: Comparison between a computer model and human observers.

Authors:  Sarah J van Riel; Francesco Ciompi; Mathilde M Winkler Wille; Asger Dirksen; Stephen Lam; Ernst Th Scholten; Santiago E Rossi; Nicola Sverzellati; Matiullah Naqibullah; Rianne Wittenberg; Marieke C Hovinga-de Boer; Miranda Snoeren; Liesbeth Peters-Bax; Onno Mets; Monique Brink; Mathias Prokop; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Bram van Ginneken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Spectrum of early lung cancer presentation in low-dose screening CT: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Cristiano Rampinelli; Sonia Francesca Calloni; Marta Minotti; Massimo Bellomi
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-05-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.