| Literature DB >> 25247693 |
Ling Tong1, Kai Li2, Qixing Zhou3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A large number of studies about effects of air pollutants on cardiovascular mortality have been conducted; however, those investigating association between air pollutants and cardiovascular morbidity are limited, especially in developing countries.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25247693 PMCID: PMC4172570 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Description of air pollutants and meteorological parameters during 2008–2011 in Tianjin.
| Season | PM10 | SO2 | NO2 | Temperature (°C) | Humidity (%) |
| Warm season (n = 732) | 79.1±1.3 | 11.8±1.3 | 6.2±0.4 | 22.5±0.2 | 61.2±0.6 |
| Cool season (n = 698) | 78.7±1.6 | 142.5±4.0 | 21.2±0.8 | 3.5±0.3 | 52.0±0.7 |
| Entire period (n = 1430) | 78.9±1.1 | 75.6±2.9 | 13.5±0.5 | 13.2±0.3 | 56.7±0.5 |
Quartile values of three pollutants.
| Quartile | PM10 (µg/m3) | SO2 (µg/m3) | NO2 (µg/m3) |
| 5th | 29.4 | 11.3 | 0.1 |
| 25th | 58.0 | 62.4 | 5.9 |
| 50th | 73.6 | 119.1 | 13.7 |
| 75th | 97.0 | 215.5 | 25.3 |
| 95th | 149.8 | 368.5 | 50.5 |
Figure 1Time series of cardiovascular morbidity from 2008 to 2011 in Tianjin.
Figure 2Exposure-response relationships (smoothing plots) of air pollutants against cardiovascular morbidity.
The x-axis is the pollutant concentrations; the y-axis is the estimated percent change in cardiovascular mortality; the solid blue lines indicate the estimated mean percent change in daily mortality outcomes with the dashed lines representing the 95% CI.
Figure 3ACF and PACF of cardiovascular morbidity (log) and (log+difference).
The x-axis is the lag number.
Figure 4ACF and PACF of residual after modeling (basic model).
The x-axis is the lag number.
Figure 5ACF and PACF of residual after modeling (basic model).
Mean daily morbidity and percent increase (95% CI) in cardiovascular morbidity of Tianjin residents associated with a 10-µg/m3 increase in air pollutant concentrations by sex and agea.
| Mean daily morbidity | Pollutant | |||
| PM10 | SO2 | NO2 | ||
| Sex | ||||
| Female | 21.86±0.23 | 0.25 (0.10, 0.39) <0.001 | 0.47 (0.10, 0.85) 0.019 | 0.57 (0.07, 1.06) 0.022 |
| Male | 31.52±0.29 | 0.13 (0.01, 0.25) 0.042 | 0.39 (0.21, 0.58) <0.001 | 0.17 (−0.16, 0.50) 0.892 |
| Age | ||||
| 5–44 | 1.94±0.04 | 0.07 (−0.05, 0.21) 0.687 | 0.11 (−0.02, 0.24) 0.566 | 0.42 (−0.19, 1.03) 0.601 |
| 45–64 | 20.27±0.19 | 0.12 (−0.16, 0.39) 0.844 | 0.21 (−0.10, 0.53) 0.947 | 0.26 (0.02, 0.51) 0.009 |
| ≥65 | 31.17±0.27 | 0.20 (0.09, 0.30) <0.001 | 0.47 (0.09, 0.85) 0.001 | 0.53 (0.31, 0.76) <0.001 |
Current day temperature and humidity (lag 0) and 2-day moving average of air pollutant concentration (lag 01) with 3df of temperature and humidity were used.
Mean percent increase (95% CI) of cardiovascular morbidity outcomes associated with 10-µg/m3 increase in air pollutant concentrations by season, 2008–2011a.
| Pollutant | Warm season | Cool season | Entire period |
| PM10 | 0.15 (−0.19, 0.50) | 0.24 (0.20, 0.28) | 0.19 (0.08, 0.31) |
| SO2 | 0.24 (0.01, 0.47) | 0.66 (0.35, 0.97) | 0.43 (0.03, 0.84) |
| NO2 | 0.21 (−0.20, 0.63) | 0.71 (0.15, 1.27) | 0.52 (−0.09, 1.13) |
We used current day temperature and humidity (lag 0) and 2-day moving average of air pollutant concentration (lag 01), and applied 3df to temperature and humidity.
*Significantly different from the warm season (p<0.05).
Sensitivity analyses for varying degrees of freedom for time trend and weather conditions: df = 4–7 per year for time trend (A), df = 3–6 for current day temperature/relative humidity (B)a.
| A | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| Warm season | 0.153 (−0.191, 0.498) | 0.154 (−0.190, 0.499) | 0.156 (−0.189, 0.502) | 0.158 (−0.187, 0.504) |
| Cool season | 0.242 (0.203, 0.280) | 0.242 (0.203, 0.281) | 0.244 (0.204, 0.283) | 0.245 (0.205, 0.285) |
| Entire period | 0.194 (0.076, 0.311) | 0.195 (0.078, 0.313) | 0.197 (0.078, 0.315) | 0.199 (0.080, 0.318) |
We used 2-day moving average (lag 01) of PM10 concentration, and current day temperature and humidity (lag0).
Sensitivity analyses for two different spline modelsa.
| Quadratic spline | Cubic nature spline | |
| Warm season | 0.151 (−0.194, 0.495) | 0.153 (−0.191, 0.498) |
| Cool season | 0.251 (0.190, 0.311) | 0.242 (0.203, 0.281) |
| Entire period | 0.196 (0.078, 0.315) | 0.194 (0.076, 0.311) |
Current day temperature and humidity (lag 0) and 2-day moving average of PM10 (lag 1) are used, 3 df for temperature and humidity is applied.