| Literature DB >> 25247198 |
Nutthiya Hanprasertpong1, Supanimit Teekachunhatean1, Rujirek Chaiwongsa2, Siriwan Ongchai3, Puongtip Kunanusorn1, Chaichan Sangdee1, Ampai Panthong1, Samreang Bunteang4, Narong Nathasaen5, Vichai Reutrakul4.
Abstract
Cryptolepis buchanani Roem. & Schult. is widely used in folk medicine in Southeast Asia for treating muscle tension and arthritis. This study aimed to investigate an analgesic activity of the methanol extract of C. buchanani (CBE) in acetic acid-induced writhing response in mice, and to examine its anti-inflammatory activity in ethyl phenylpropiolate- (EPP-) induced ear edema and carrageenan-induced paw edema in rats. Its effects on cartilage degradation induced by interleukin-1β (IL-1β) in porcine cartilage explant culture were also determined. This study demonstrated that CBE significantly reduced acetic acid-induced writhing response. It also inhibited edema formation in both EPP-induced ear edema and carrageenan-induced paw edema models. In cartilage explant culture, CBE significantly reduced the sulfated glycosaminoglycan and hyaluronan released into culture media while it reserved the uronic acid and collagen within the cartilage tissues. It also suppressed the matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity with no effect on cell viability. In conclusion, CBE shows analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and chondroprotective effects in this preliminary study. Therefore, CBE may be useful as an alternative treatment for osteoarthritis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25247198 PMCID: PMC4160634 DOI: 10.1155/2014/978582
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1High-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) fingerprints of CBE. The chromatographic separation was carried out on a Fortis C18 (4.6 × 150 mm) column using a gradient elution consisting of water/methanol/acetonitrite (1/4/95, v/v) as a mobile phase. The UV absorbance was monitored with diode array detection (DAD) at 254 nm (a) and 320 nm (b).
Effects of CBE and indomethacin on acetic acid-induced writhing response in mice (n = 6).
| Treatment | Number of writhes | % inhibition |
|---|---|---|
| 80% Tween | 32.00 ± 2.71 | — |
| CBE 60 mg/kg | 22.00 ± 1.36∗,†† | 31.25 |
| CBE 125 mg/kg | 16.00 ± 0.96∗,† | 50.00 |
| CBE 250 mg/kg | 15.83 ± 1.25∗,† | 50.53 |
| Indomethacin 5 mg/kg | 9.50 ± 0.96∗ | 70.31 |
Results are mean of number of writhes ± S.E.M. ∗P ≤ 0.001 compared with control group. † P ≤ 0.01 and †† P ≤ 0.001 compared with indomethacin group.
Effects of CBE and indomethacin on EPP-induced ear edema in rats (n = 10).
| Treatment | Edema thickness (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 min | 30 min | 60 min | 120 min | |
| 5% DMSO in ethanol/ear | 89 ± 3.79 | 163 ± 5.98 | 240 ± 8.70 | 169 ± 16.17 |
| CBE 1 mg/ear | 35 ± 6.20∗ | 64 ± 4.99∗ | 90 ± 9.55∗ | 63 ± 10.23∗ |
| Indomethacin 1 mg/ear | 20 ± 5.78∗ | 53 ± 11.37∗ | 96 ± 12.68∗ | 65 ± 4.28∗ |
Results are mean of edema thickness ± S.E.M. ∗P ≤ 0.001 compared with control group.
Effects of CBE and indomethacin on carrageenan-induced hind paw edema in rats (n = 6).
| Treatment | Edema volume (mL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st h | % EI | 3rd h | % EI | 5th h | % EI | |
| 80% Tween | 0.36 ± 0.05 | — | 0.83 ± 0.05 | — | 0.74 ± 0.03 | — |
| CBE 100 mg/kg | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 51.61 | 0.55 ± 0.03∗ | 33.78 | 0.57 ± 0.06 | 22.58 |
| CBE 250 mg/kg | 0.14 ± 0.02∗∗ | 60.64 | 0.45 ± 0.03∗ | 45.60 | 0.49 ± 0.06∗ | 34.28 |
| CBE 500 mg/kg | 0.12 ± 0.03∗∗ | 66.00 | 0.41 ± 0.07∗ | 50.37 | 0.40 ± 0.05∗ | 46.06 |
| Indomethacin 10 mg/kg | 0.06 ± 0.03∗∗ | 82.39 | 0.25 ± 0.02∗∗ | 70.32 | 0.31 ± 0.04∗∗ | 58.36 |
Results are mean of edema volume ± S.E.M. % EI is percentage of edema volume inhibition of test compound. ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗P ≤ 0.01 compared with control group.
Figure 2Effects of CBE on the release of s-GAG (a) and HA (b) into the medium as well as the content of uronic acid (c) and collagen (d) left in cartilage disc. Data are percentage of the control group. ∗, ∗∗, and ∗∗∗ denote significant difference from the IL-1β group (P < 0.05, P ≤ 0.01, and P ≤ 0.001, resp.).
Figure 3Effects of CBE on MMP-2 activity. ∗∗P ≤ 0.01 and ∗∗∗P ≤ 0.001 compared with IL-1β group.