Literature DB >> 25246173

Temporary arthrodesis using fixator rods in two-stage revision of septic knee prothesis with severe bone and tissue defects.

Eric Röhner1,2, Tilman Pfitzner3, Bernd Preininger3, Timo Zippelius3, Carsten Perka3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study describes a new temporary arthrodesis procedure, which aims for septic knee prosthesis replacement, in particular for larger bone and soft tissue defects. Our technique offers high stability and full weight-bearing capacity of the knee joint.
METHODS: The study included 16 patients with major bone defects (AORI type IIb or greater) after receiving a radical debridement and a septic two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty. After removing the infected prosthesis and debridement, two AO fixator rods were positioned into the intramedullary space of the femur and tibia. Subsequently, both rods were joined tube-to-tube and adjusted in the center of the knee joint. Finally, the whole cavity of the knee joint was filled with PMMA. The number of previous surgeries, bacterial spectrum, risk factors for further infection and reinfection rates was recorded. Immediately after the temporary arthrodesis, radiographs of the knee with the enclosed spacers were taken in order to compare to previous radiographs and avoiding to miss possible spacer loosening.
RESULTS: Nine of sixteen patients underwent more than two revision surgeries before receiving our new arthrodesis technique. No cases of spacer loosening were observed in all 16 patients; further, there were no peri-implant fractures, and four persistent infections were noted.
CONCLUSIONS: Temporary arthrodesis using AO fixator rods offers a high stability without loosening. Its potential to replace conventional augmentation techniques should be taken into account, particularly in the case of larger bone and tissue defects. In clinical practice, the cemented spacer using AO fixator rods could be an alternative technique for temporary knee arthrodesis after septic debridement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AO fixator rods; Septic knee prosthesis replacement; Temporary arthrodesis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25246173     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3324-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  26 in total

1.  The PROSTALAC functional spacer in two-stage revision for infected knee replacements. Prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement.

Authors:  F S Haddad; B A Masri; D Campbell; R W McGraw; C P Beauchamp; C P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-08

Review 2.  Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers.

Authors:  C L Romanò; L Gala; N Logoluso; D Romanò; L Drago
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Technique and timing of two-stage exchange for infection in TKA.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Michael A Kelly; Arlen D Hanssen; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The treatment of recurrent chronic infected knee arthroplasty with a 2-stage procedure.

Authors:  Valentin Antoci; Matthew J Phillips; Valentin Antoci; Kenneth A Krackow
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Functional advantage of articulating versus static spacers in 2-stage revision for total knee arthroplasty infection.

Authors:  Mark G Freeman; Thomas K Fehring; Susan M Odum; Keith Fehring; William L Griffin; J Bohannon Mason
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Increasing financial burden of revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kayode O Oduwole; Diarmuid C Molony; Ray J Walls; Simi P Bashir; Kevin J Mulhall
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Surgical Techniques for Staged Revision of the Chronically Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Steven J Fitzgerald; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2011-12

8.  Reinfection after two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bernd Kubista; Robert U Hartzler; Christina M Wood; Douglas R Osmon; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Results of 2-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K Hirakawa; B N Stulberg; A H Wilde; T W Bauer; M Secic
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Two stage revision knee arthroplasty for infection with massive bone loss. A technique to achieve spacer stability.

Authors:  R S J Nickinson; T N Board; A K Gambhir; M L Porter; P R Kay
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  3 in total

1.  High Rates of Aseptic Loosening After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Arne Kienzle; Sandy Walter; Philipp von Roth; Michael Fuchs; Tobias Winkler; Michael Müller
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-08-12

2.  Conversion From Knee Arthrodesis Back to Arthroplasty: A Particular Challenge in Combination With Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Sven Frieler; Emre Yilmaz; Ryan Goodmanson; Yannik Hanusrichter; Thomas A Schildhauer; Hinnerk Baecker
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-12-05

3.  Risk of reinfection after two- or multiple-stage knee revision surgery using superficial vancomycin coating and conventional spacers.

Authors:  Florian Amerstorfer; Martina Schober; Thomas Valentin; Sebastian Klim; Andreas Leithner; Stefan Fischerauer; Mathias Glehr
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.494

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.