CONTEXT: Data on pituitary imaging in adult male patients presenting with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (HH) and no known pituitary disease are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of pituitary imaging in the evaluation of men presenting with HH after excluding known pituitary disorders and hyperprolactinemia. DESIGN: A historical prospective cohort of males with HH. PATIENTS: Men who presented for endocrine evaluation from 2011 to 2014 with testosterone levels <10.4 nmol/L (300 ng/mL), normal LH and FSH levels and no known pituitary disease. RESULTS: Seventy-five men were included in the analysis. Their mean age and BMI were 53.4 ± 14.8 years and 30.7 ± 5.2 kg/m2, respectively. Mean total testosterone, LH, and FSH were 6.2 ± 1.7 nmol/L, 3.4 ± 2 and 4.7 ± 3.1 mIU/L, respectively. Prolactin level within the normal range was obtained in all men (mean 161 ± 61, range 41-347 mIU/L). Sixty-two men had pituitary MRI and 13 performed CT. In 61 (81.3%) men pituitary imaging was normal. Microadenoma was found in 8 (10.7%), empty sella and thickened pituitary stalk in one patient (1.3%) each. In other four patients (5.3%) a small or mildly asymmetric pituitary gland was noted. No correlation was found between testosterone level and the presence of pituitary anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the use of routine hypothalamic-pituitary imaging in the evaluation of IHH, in the absence of clinical characteristics of other hormonal loss or sellar compression symptoms, will not increase the diagnostic yield of sellar structural abnormalities over that reported in the general population.
CONTEXT: Data on pituitary imaging in adult male patients presenting with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (HH) and no known pituitary disease are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of pituitary imaging in the evaluation of men presenting with HH after excluding known pituitary disorders and hyperprolactinemia. DESIGN: A historical prospective cohort of males with HH. PATIENTS: Men who presented for endocrine evaluation from 2011 to 2014 with testosterone levels <10.4 nmol/L (300 ng/mL), normal LH and FSH levels and no known pituitary disease. RESULTS: Seventy-five men were included in the analysis. Their mean age and BMI were 53.4 ± 14.8 years and 30.7 ± 5.2 kg/m2, respectively. Mean total testosterone, LH, and FSH were 6.2 ± 1.7 nmol/L, 3.4 ± 2 and 4.7 ± 3.1 mIU/L, respectively. Prolactin level within the normal range was obtained in all men (mean 161 ± 61, range 41-347 mIU/L). Sixty-two men had pituitary MRI and 13 performed CT. In 61 (81.3%) men pituitary imaging was normal. Microadenoma was found in 8 (10.7%), empty sella and thickened pituitary stalk in one patient (1.3%) each. In other four patients (5.3%) a small or mildly asymmetric pituitary gland was noted. No correlation was found between testosterone level and the presence of pituitary anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the use of routine hypothalamic-pituitary imaging in the evaluation of IHH, in the absence of clinical characteristics of other hormonal loss or sellar compression symptoms, will not increase the diagnostic yield of sellar structural abnormalities over that reported in the general population.
Authors: Frederick C W Wu; Abdelouahid Tajar; Jennifer M Beynon; Stephen R Pye; Alan J Silman; Joseph D Finn; Terence W O'Neill; Gyorgy Bartfai; Felipe F Casanueva; Gianni Forti; Aleksander Giwercman; Thang S Han; Krzysztof Kula; Michael E J Lean; Neil Pendleton; Margus Punab; Steven Boonen; Dirk Vanderschueren; Fernand Labrie; Ilpo T Huhtaniemi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alexander Tsertsvadze; Howard A Fink; Fatemeh Yazdi; Roderick MacDonald; Anthony J Bella; Mohammed T Ansari; Chantelle Garritty; Karla Soares-Weiser; Raymond Daniel; Margaret Sampson; Steven Fox; David Moher; Timothy J Wilt Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: M F Slag; J E Morley; M K Elson; D L Trence; C J Nelson; A E Nelson; W B Kinlaw; H S Beyer; F Q Nuttall; R B Shafer Journal: JAMA Date: 1983-04-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Pamela U Freda; Albert M Beckers; Laurence Katznelson; Mark E Molitch; Victor M Montori; Kalmon D Post; Mary Lee Vance Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: S Cipriani; T Todisco; N Ghiandai; L Vignozzi; G Corona; M Maggi; G Rastrelli Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 4.256