INTRODUCTION: We evaluated ocular outcomes in a 14-d head-down tilt (HDT) bed rest (BR) study designed to simulate the effects of microgravity on the human body. METHODS: Healthy subjects were selected using NASA standard screening procedures. Standardized NASA BR conditions were implemented (e.g., strict sleep-wake cycle, standardized diet, 24-hour-a-day BR, continuous video monitoring). Subjects maintained a 6° HDT position for 14 consecutive days. Weekly ophthalmological examinations were performed in the sitting (pre/post-BR) and HDT (in-bed phase) positions. Equivalency tests with optimal-alpha techniques evaluated pre/post-BR differences in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent, intraocular pressure (IOP), Spectral-domain OCT retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), optic disc and macular parameters. RESULTS: 16 subjects (12 men and 4 women) were enrolled. Nearly all ocular outcomes were within our predefined clinically relevant thresholds following HDTBR, except near BCVA (pre/post-BR mean difference: -0.06 logMAR), spherical equivalent (-0.30 D), Tonopen XL IOP (+3.03 mmHg) and Spectralis OCT average (+1.14 μm), temporal-inferior (+1.58 μm) and nasal-inferior RNFLT (+3.48 μm). Modified Amsler grid, red dot test, confrontational visual field, and color vision were within normal limits throughout. No changes were detected on stereoscopic color fundus photography. DISCUSSION: A few functional and structural changes were detected after 14-d HDTBR, notably an improved BCVA possibly due to learning effect and RNFL thickening without signs of optic disc edema. In general, 6° HDTBR determined a small nonprogressive IOP elevation, which returned to baseline levels post-BR. Further studies with different BR duration and/or tilt angle are warranted to investigate microgravity-induced ophthalmological changes.
INTRODUCTION: We evaluated ocular outcomes in a 14-d head-down tilt (HDT) bed rest (BR) study designed to simulate the effects of microgravity on the human body. METHODS: Healthy subjects were selected using NASA standard screening procedures. Standardized NASA BR conditions were implemented (e.g., strict sleep-wake cycle, standardized diet, 24-hour-a-day BR, continuous video monitoring). Subjects maintained a 6° HDT position for 14 consecutive days. Weekly ophthalmological examinations were performed in the sitting (pre/post-BR) and HDT (in-bed phase) positions. Equivalency tests with optimal-alpha techniques evaluated pre/post-BR differences in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent, intraocular pressure (IOP), Spectral-domain OCT retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), optic disc and macular parameters. RESULTS: 16 subjects (12 men and 4 women) were enrolled. Nearly all ocular outcomes were within our predefined clinically relevant thresholds following HDTBR, except near BCVA (pre/post-BR mean difference: -0.06 logMAR), spherical equivalent (-0.30 D), Tonopen XL IOP (+3.03 mmHg) and Spectralis OCT average (+1.14 μm), temporal-inferior (+1.58 μm) and nasal-inferior RNFLT (+3.48 μm). Modified Amsler grid, red dot test, confrontational visual field, and color vision were within normal limits throughout. No changes were detected on stereoscopic color fundus photography. DISCUSSION: A few functional and structural changes were detected after 14-d HDTBR, notably an improved BCVA possibly due to learning effect and RNFL thickening without signs of optic disc edema. In general, 6° HDTBR determined a small nonprogressive IOP elevation, which returned to baseline levels post-BR. Further studies with different BR duration and/or tilt angle are warranted to investigate microgravity-induced ophthalmological changes.
Authors: Ute E K Wolf-Schnurrbusch; Lala Ceklic; Christian K Brinkmann; Milko E Iliev; Manuel Frey; Simon P Rothenbuehler; Volker Enzmann; Sebastian Wolf Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-02-21 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Donna R Roberts; Heather R Collins; Jessica K Lee; James A Taylor; Matthew Turner; Greg Zaharchuk; Max Wintermark; Michael U Antonucci; Edwin R Mulder; Darius A Gerlach; Davud Asemani; Heather R McGregor; Rachael D Seidler Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Giovanni Taibbi; Ronita L Cromwell; Susana B Zanello; Patrice O Yarbough; Robert J Ploutz-Snyder; Bernard F Godley; Gianmarco Vizzeri Journal: Aerosp Med Hum Perform Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 1.053
Authors: Giovanni Taibbi; Ronita L Cromwell; Susana B Zanello; Patrice O Yarbough; Robert J Ploutz-Snyder; Bernard F Godley; Gianmarco Vizzeri Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Vincent Koppelmans; Ofer Pasternak; Jacob J Bloomberg; Yiri E De Dios; Scott J Wood; Roy Riascos; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Igor S Kofman; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Rachael D Seidler Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-06-09 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Steven S Laurie; Gianmarco Vizzeri; Giovanni Taibbi; Connor R Ferguson; Xiao Hu; Stuart M C Lee; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Scott M Smith; Sara R Zwart; Michael B Stenger Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2017-06
Authors: Darius A Gerlach; Karina Marshall-Goebel; Khader M Hasan; Larry A Kramer; Noam Alperin; Joern Rittweger Journal: NPJ Microgravity Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 4.415
Authors: Vincent Koppelmans; Jessica M Scott; Meghan E Downs; Kaitlin E Cassady; Peng Yuan; Ofer Pasternak; Scott J Wood; Yiri E De Dios; Nichole E Gadd; Igor Kofman; Roy Riascos; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Jacob J Bloomberg; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Lori L Ploutz-Snyder; Rachael D Seidler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 3.240