Literature DB >> 25245538

Outcomes of immediate perforator flap reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

K Narui1, T Ishikawa2, T Satake3, S Adachi2, A Yamada2, K Shimada2, D Shimizu2, K Kida4, S Sugae4, Y Ichikawa5, M Tanabe6, T Sasaki6, I Endo4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on immediate free flap breast reconstruction remains controversial. Furthermore, the oncological outcomes of immediate free flap breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) following NACT remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the surgical complications and oncological outcomes of immediate perforator flap reconstruction after SSM following NACT.
METHODS: A total of 201 consecutive patients with indications for immediate perforator flap reconstruction after SSM were included between 2004 and 2012. Surgical and oncological outcomes were compared between patients with and without NACT.
RESULTS: There were 38 patients in the NACT group and 163 in the non-NACT control group. The median age of the NACT group was 39.5 years, which was significantly younger than the control group (43.0 years; P < 0.05). Patients in the NACT group also had more advanced and aggressive disease (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the frequency of surgical complications between the groups, no difference in the type of complications, and no significant difference in the frequencies of major and minor complications. No patients in the NACT group had delayed adjuvant therapy. Eight patients (4%) developed recurrences, with a median follow-up time of 3.0 years. Local recurrences occurred in three control patients but no patients in the NACT group.
CONCLUSION: NACT does not affect short-term or interim outcomes after immediate perforator flap reconstruction and may thus represent a safe and practical treatment option for the multidisciplinary treatment of breast cancer.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Immediate reconstruction; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Perforator flap

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25245538     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  5 in total

Review 1.  Innovative Standards in Surgery of the Breast after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Tal Hadar; Michael Koretz; Mahmood Nawass; Tanir M Allweis
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Reconstructive outcome analysis of the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on immediate breast reconstruction: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jia-Ruei Yang; Wen-Ling Kuo; Chi-Chang Yu; Shin-Cheh Chen; Jung-Ju Huang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Breast cancer recurrence after immediate and delayed postmastectomy breast reconstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudia A Bargon; Danny A Young-Afat; Mehmet Ikinci; Assa Braakenburg; Hinne A Rakhorst; Marc A M Mureau; Helena M Verkooijen; Annemiek Doeksen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 6.921

4.  Surgical Outcomes for Mastectomy Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Megan E Bowen; Mary C Mone; Saundra S Buys; Xiaoming Sheng; Edward W Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Salvage mastectomy for local recurrence and second ipsilateral autologous breast reconstruction using a perforator flap from a different donor site.

Authors:  Yuki Homma; Toshihiko Satake; Kazutaka Narui; Yoshihiko Tamanoi; Mayu Muto; Takako Komiya; Shinji Kobayashi; Takashi Ishikawa; Jiro Maegawa
Journal:  Case Reports Plast Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2018-09-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.