Literature DB >> 25245470

Evaluation of the time required for overhead tasks performed by physicians, medical physicists, and technicians in radiation oncology institutions: the DEGRO-QUIRO study.

Cornelia Sack1, Horst Sack, Normann Willich, Wolfgang Popp.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Developments in radiation oncology in recent years have highlighted the increasing deployment of personnel resources for tasks not directly related to patients. These tasks include patient-related activities such as treatment planning, reviewing files, and administrative duties (e.g., invoicing for services, documentation). The aim of the present study, part of the QUIRO project of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO), was to describe, on the basis of valid data, the deployment of personnel resources in radiation oncology centers for "overhead" tasks.
METHODS: Questionnaires were used to analyze the percentages of time needed for various tasks. The target group comprised physicians, medical physics experts (MPE), and medical technical radiology assistants (MTRA). A total of 760 personnel from 65 radio-oncology centers in the German inpatient and outpatient sector participated (32 % physicians, 23 % MPE, and 45 % MTRA).
RESULTS: High percentages of overhead tasks during working time were measured for each of the three personnel groups considered (physicians, MPE, and MTRA). Patient-related efficiency, i.e., the percentage of working time associated directly or indirectly with the patient, was highest among MTRA and lowest among MPE. Particular features could be seen in the activity profiles of personnel in university clinics. Duties in the areas of research and teaching resulted in a greater percentage of overhead tasks for physicians and MPE. Irrespective of function (physician, MPE, or MTRA), a managerial role resulted in lower patient-related efficiency, as well as a narrower time budget for direct patient care compared with non-managerial employees.
CONCLUSION: Using the data gathered, it was possible to systematically investigate the time required for overhead tasks in radio-oncological centers. Overall, relatively high time requirements for a variety of overhead tasks were measured. These time requirements, generated for example by administrative duties or research and teaching, are currently not taken into adequate consideration in terms of remuneration or personnel capacity planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25245470     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-014-0758-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  19 in total

1.  Time and motion study of anesthesiologists' workflow in German hospitals.

Authors:  Inka Hauschild; Karin Vitzthum; Burghard F Klapp; David A Groneberg; Stefanie Mache
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-09

2.  How hospitalists spend their time: insights on efficiency and safety.

Authors:  Kevin J O'Leary; David M Liebovitz; David W Baker
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.960

3.  Introduction of diagnosis-related groups in Germany: evaluation of impact on in-patient care in a dermatological setting.

Authors:  P Hensen; S Beissert; L Bruckner-Tuderman; T A Luger; N Roeder; M L Müller
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Time management in radiation oncology: evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the DEGRO-QUIRO trial.

Authors:  L Keilholz; J Willner; H-J Thiel; N Zamboglou; H Sack; W Popp
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  [Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during stereotactic radiotherapy/radiosurgery : QUIRO-DEGRO Trial].

Authors:  A Zabel-du Bois; S Milker-Zabel; M Henzel; W Popp; J Debus; H Sack; R Engenhart-Cabillic
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Time spent in face-to-face patient care and work outside the examination room.

Authors:  Andrew Gottschalk; Susan A Flocke
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Physician activities during time out of the examination room.

Authors:  Valerie Gilchrist; Gary McCord; Susan Labuda Schrop; Bridget D King; Kenelm F McCormick; Allison M Oprandi; Brian A Selius; Michael Cowher; Rishi Maheshwary; Falguni Patel; Ami Shah; Bonny Tsai; Mia Zaharna
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Four minutes for a patient, twenty seconds for a relative - an observational study at a university hospital.

Authors:  Gerhild Becker; Dorothee E Kempf; Carola J Xander; Felix Momm; Manfred Olschewski; Hubert E Blum
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Protection of quality and innovation in radiation oncology: the prospective multicenter trial the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO-QUIRO study). Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during radiotherapy with IMRT.

Authors:  H Vorwerk; K Zink; R Schiller; V Budach; D Böhmer; S Kampfer; W Popp; H Sack; R Engenhart-Cabillic
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Medical work Assessment in German hospitals: a Real-time Observation study (MAGRO) - the study protocol.

Authors:  David A Groneberg; Stefanie Mache
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 2.646

View more
  2 in total

1.  Accurate method for evaluating the duration of the entire radiotherapy process.

Authors:  Chenlei Guo; Peng Huang; Yexiong Li; Jianrong Dai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Is prone free breathing better than supine deep inspiration breath-hold for left whole-breast radiotherapy? A dosimetric analysis.

Authors:  Xinzhuo Wang; Odile Fargier-Bochaton; Giovanna Dipasquale; Mohamed Laouiti; Melpomeni Kountouri; Olena Gorobets; Nam P Nguyen; Raymond Miralbell; Vincent Vinh-Hung
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.621

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.