Literature DB >> 25245452

Genetic vulnerability to diabetes and obesity: does education offset the risk?

S Y Liu1, S Walter2, J Marden3, D H Rehkopf4, L D Kubzansky3, T Nguyen3, M M Glymour5.   

Abstract

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity has recently increased dramatically. These common diseases are likely to arise from the interaction of multiple genetic, socio-demographic and environmental risk factors. While previous research has found genetic risk and education to be strong predictors of these diseases, few studies to date have examined their joint effects. This study investigates whether education modifies the association between genetic background and risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. Using data from non-Hispanic Whites in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS, n = 8398), we tested whether education modifies genetic risk for obesity and T2D, offsetting genetic effects; whether this effect is larger for individuals who have high risk for other (unobserved) reasons, i.e., at higher quantiles of HbA1c and BMI; and whether effects differ by gender. We measured T2D risk using Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, and obesity risk using body-mass index (BMI). We constructed separate genetic risk scores (GRS) for obesity and diabetes respectively based on the most current available information on the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) confirmed as genome-wide significant predictors for BMI (29 SNPs) and diabetes risk (39 SNPs). Linear regression models with years of schooling indicate that the effect of genetic risk on HbA1c is smaller among people with more years of schooling and larger among those with less than a high school (HS) degree compared to HS degree-holders. Quantile regression models show that the GRS × education effect systematically increased along the HbA1c outcome distribution; for example the GRS × years of education interaction coefficient was -0.01 (95% CI = -0.03, 0.00) at the 10th percentile compared to -0.03 (95% CI = -0.07, 0.00) at the 90th percentile. These results suggest that education may be an important socioeconomic source of heterogeneity in responses to genetic vulnerability to T2D.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes; Education; Genetic risk; Obesity; Older adults

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25245452      PMCID: PMC7309526          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  47 in total

1.  Low hemoglobin A1c and risk of all-cause mortality among US adults without diabetes.

Authors:  April P Carson; Caroline S Fox; Darren K McGuire; Emily B Levitan; Martin Laclaustra; Devin M Mann; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2010-10-05

Review 2.  Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities: theory, evidence, and policy implications.

Authors:  Jo C Phelan; Bruce G Link; Parisa Tehranifar
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2010

3.  Global healthcare expenditure on diabetes for 2010 and 2030.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Xinzhi Zhang; Jonathan Brown; Dorte Vistisen; Richard Sicree; Jonathan Shaw; Gregory Nichols
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 5.602

4.  Use, type, and efficacy of assistance for disability.

Authors:  Lois M Verbrugge; Purvi Sevak
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK.

Authors:  Y Claire Wang; Klim McPherson; Tim Marsh; Steven L Gortmaker; Martin Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Gene-environment interactions in the development of type 2 diabetes: recent progress and continuing challenges.

Authors:  Marilyn C Cornelis; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 7.  Current views on type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Yi Lin; Zhongjie Sun
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  The causes, prevalence, and treatment of obesity revisited in 2009: what have we learned so far?

Authors:  Caroline M Apovian
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Body-mass index and mortality among adults with incident type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Deirdre K Tobias; An Pan; Chandra L Jackson; Eilis J O'Reilly; Eric L Ding; Walter C Willett; JoAnn E Manson; Frank B Hu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Education modifies genetic and environmental influences on BMI.

Authors:  Wendy Johnson; Kirsten Ohm Kyvik; Axel Skytthe; Ian J Deary; Thorkild I A Sørensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Stress resilience and subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes in 1.5 million young men.

Authors:  Casey Crump; Jan Sundquist; Marilyn A Winkleby; Kristina Sundquist
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Education as a moderator of genetic risk for higher body mass index: prospective cohort study from childhood to adulthood.

Authors:  K Komulainen; L Pulkki-Råback; M Jokela; L-P Lyytikäinen; N Pitkänen; T Laitinen; M Hintsanen; M Elovainio; T Hintsa; A Jula; M Juonala; K Pahkala; J Viikari; T Lehtimäki; O Raitakari; L Keltikangas-Järvinen
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Does education attenuate the genetic risk of obesity? Evidence from U.K. Twins.

Authors:  Vikesh Amin; Paul Dunn; Tim Spector
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.184

4.  The Relative Contributions of Socioeconomic and Genetic Factors to Variations in Body Mass Index Among Young Adults.

Authors:  Rockli Kim; Adam M Lippert; Robbee Wedow; Marcia P Jimenez; S V Subramanian
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Socioeconomic inequities in diet quality among a nationally representative sample of adults living in Canada: an analysis of trends between 2004 and 2015.

Authors:  Dana Lee Olstad; Sara Nejatinamini; Charlie Victorino; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Leia M Minaker; Lindsay McLaren
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 8.472

6.  The health benefits of secondary education in adolescents and young adults: An international analysis in 186 low-, middle- and high-income countries from 1990 to 2013.

Authors:  Russell M Viner; Dougal S Hargreaves; Joseph Ward; Chris Bonell; Ali H Mokdad; George Patton
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2017-12

7.  A genetic sum score of risk alleles associated with body mass index interacts with socioeconomic position in the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study.

Authors:  Mirjam Frank; Nico Dragano; Marina Arendt; Andreas J Forstner; Markus M Nöthen; Susanne Moebus; Raimund Erbel; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Börge Schmidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Self-determination theory interventions versus usual care in people with diabetes: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Anne Sophie Mathiesen; Mette Juel Rothmann; Vibeke Zoffmann; Janus Christian Jakobsen; Christian Gluud; Jane Lindschou; Mette Due-Christensen; Bodil Rasmussen; Emilie Marqvorsen; Thordis Thomsen
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 9.  Current Applications of Genetic Risk Scores to Cardiovascular Outcomes and Subclinical Phenotypes.

Authors:  Jennifer A Smith; Erin B Ware; Pooja Middha; Lisa Beacher; Sharon L R Kardia
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2015

10.  Associations of Genetic Factors, Educational Attainment, and Their Interaction With Kidney Function Outcomes.

Authors:  Chris H L Thio; Sander K R van Zon; Peter J van der Most; Harold Snieder; Ute Bültmann; Ron T Gansevoort
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.