| Literature DB >> 25245260 |
Abstract
Phytoextraction of mercury-contaminated soils is a new strategy that consists of using the higher plants to make the soil contaminant nontoxic. The main problem that occurs during the process is the low solubility and bioavailability of mercury in soil. Therefore, some soil amendments can be used to increase the efficiency of the Hg phytoextraction process. The aim of the investigation was to use the commercial compost from municipal green wastes to increase the efficiency of phytoextraction of mercury-contaminated soil by Lepidium sativum L. plants and determine the leaching of Hg after compost amendment. The result of the study showed that Hg can be accumulated by L. sativum L. The application of compost increased both the accumulation by whole plant and translocation of Hg to shoots. Compost did not affect the plant biomass and its biometric parameters. Application of compost to the soil decreased the leaching of mercury in both acidic and neutral solutions regardless of growing medium composition and time of analysis. Due to Hg accumulation and translocation as well as its potential leaching in acidic and neutral solution, compost can be recommended as a soil amendment during the phytoextraction of mercury-contaminated soil.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25245260 PMCID: PMC4334079 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3601-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Soil and municipal green waste compost properties (mean ± standard deviation n = 3)
| Parameter | Soil (blank sample) | MGW compost |
|---|---|---|
| pH (H2O) | 6.45 ± 0.01 | 8.10 ± 0.02 |
| Organic carbon [g kg−1 dry weight] | 5.47 ± 0.83 | 34.46 ± 1.25 |
| Total nitrogen [g kg−1 dry weight] | 0.52 ± 0.10 | 1.95 ± 0.09 |
| Available phosphorous [g kg−1 dry weight] | 0.38 ± 0.07 | 22.14 ± 1.12 |
| Hg [mg kg−1 dry weight] | nd | nd |
| Pb [mg kg−1 dry weight] | 0.047 ± 0.005 | 0.786 ± 0.089 |
| Cu [mg kg−1 dry weight] | 0.023 ± 0.003 | 1.352 ± 0.578 |
| Zn [mg kg−1 dry weight] | 0.029 ± 0.008 | 0.847 ± 0.706 |
nd not detected
Fig. 1Concentration of Hg in roots and shoots of Lepidium sativum L. for soil polluted by a 10 mg kg−1 soil dry weight of HgCl2 and b 100 mg kg−1 soil dry weight of HgCl2
Biomass of Lepidium sativum L. and its biometrical parameters. Different letters indicate significant difference at p<0.05 by LSD test
| Hg concentration added to soil [mg kg−1 dry weight] | Growing medium | Plant biomass [g] | Length of plant [cm] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shoots | Roots | Shoots | Roots | ||
| 0 | Soil (blank sample) | 18.70a ± 0.37 | 11.36a ± 0.15 | 7.54 ± 0.12 | 4.58 ± 0.15 |
| 10 | Soil (control sample) | 16.63a ± 0.40 | 6.05a ± 0.07 | 5.47 ± 0.25 | 2.14 ± 0.11 |
| Soil/compost 2/1 | 20.46b ± 0.22 | 8.54b ± 0.44 | 7.21 ± 0.32 | 3.01 ± 0.02 | |
| Soil/compost 3/1 | 19.04b ± 0.18 | 8.08b ± 0.15 | 6.29 ± 0.20 | 2.67 ± 0.11 | |
| Soil/compost 4/1 | 18.47a ± 0.17 | 6.60a ± 0.22 | 5.99 ± 0.40 | 2.14 ± 0.15 | |
| 100 | Soil (control sample) | 15.24a ± 0.17 | 4.05a ± 0.10 | 4.03 ± 0.09 | 1.07 ± 0.10 |
| Soil/compost 2/1 | 16.70b ± 0.44 | 7.43b ± 0.14 | 6.00 ± 0.17 | 2.67 ± 0.22 | |
| Soil/compost 3/1 | 14.35c ± 0.16 | 8.36c ± 0.26 | 5.20 ± 0.15 | 3.03 ± 0.14 | |
| Soil/compost 4/1 | 14.57a ± 0.15 | 5.83a ± 0.14 | 5.12 ± 0.15 | 2.05 ± 0.08 | |
Fig. 2Hg concentration in water extracts (pH = 7 and pH = 5) for mercury pollution. a 10 mg kg−1 soil dry mass of HgCl2. b 100 mg kg−1 soil dry mass of HgCl2
Bioconcentration factor (BCF) for Lepidium sativum L. cultivated in different growing medium
| Hg concentration | Soil (control samples) | Growing medium | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil/compost 2/1 | Soil/compost 3/1 | Soil/compost 4/1 | Soil/compost 2/1 | Soil/compost 3/1 | Soil/compost 4/1 | |||
| 10 | 100 | 10 | 100 | |||||
| BCF | 0.009 | 0.008 | 0.128 | 0.100 | 0.120 | 0.093 | 0.078 | 0.062 |