Literature DB >> 25245135

Osseointegrated hearing implant surgery using a novel hydroxyapatite-coated concave abutment design.

Mark D Wilkie1, Kalyan M Chakravarthy2, Constantinos Mamais2, Robert H Temple2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recently, a novel hydroxyapatite-coated concave bone-anchored hearing device abutment was introduced, the first designed specifically to improve outcomes in soft-tissue preservation osseointegrated hearing implant surgery. We sought to evaluate our early experience with this abutment. STUDY
DESIGN: A single-center case series with planned data collection including patient-reported outcomes.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The first 30 consecutive patients undergoing osseointegrated hearing implant surgery using the Cochlear DermaLock (BA400) abutment at our institution (February-September 2013) were studied. Follow-up was for a minimum of 6 months. The following data were collected: operative duration; wound healing; postoperative complications, chiefly soft-tissue reactions graded by Holger's classification; and postintervention patient-perceived health-related quality of life, as assessed by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI).
RESULTS: The mean operating time was 16 minutes (range, 9-22 minutes). Favorable and rapid wound healing was observed in all cases. Three patients (10%) reported transient periabutment paraesthesia. Four patients (13.3%) suffered adverse soft-tissue reactions, all of which were successfully managed conservatively and graded as follows: Holger's grade 1 (n = 2), 2 (n = 1), and 3 (n = 1). Respective overall general health, social support, and physical health GBI mean scores were +38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 31 to 45), +51 (95% CI, 42 to 60), +19 (95% CI, 8 to 30), and +8 (95% CI, -1 to 17).
CONCLUSION: Our preliminary clinical and patient-reported outcomes support soft-tissue preservation surgery and indicate that the technology on which the Cochlear DermaLock (BA400) abutment is based may enhance soft-tissue outcomes in this context. We recommend further appraisal of this approach on a larger scale with more extensive follow-up. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abutment; bone-anchored hearing implant; hydroxyapatite; minimal invasive surgery; osseointegrated implant; surgical technique

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25245135     DOI: 10.1177/0194599814551150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  4 in total

1.  Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction.

Authors:  E H H van der Stee; R M Strijbos; S J H Bom; M K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Long-term soft tissue outcomes for hydroxyapatite-coated bone-anchored hearing implant surgery.

Authors:  Todd Kanzara; Hussein Walijee; Rashid Badar Sheikh; Andrew Lau; Robert Temple
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Modified Baha Punch Technique: Least Invasive, Shortest Time and No Suturing.

Authors:  Hassan Alshehri; Abdulrahman Alsanosi; Osama Majdalawieh
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-12

Review 4.  The Glasgow Benefit Inventory: a systematic review of the use and value of an otorhinolaryngological generic patient-recorded outcome measure.

Authors:  J Hendry; A Chin; I R C Swan; M A Akeroyd; G G Browning
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 2.597

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.