| Literature DB >> 25244641 |
Klaus Tiroch1, Heinrich Schleiting, Nikos Karpettas, Edgar Schmitz, Herbert O Vetter, Melchior Seyfarth, Marc Vorpahl, Martyn Thomas, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Holger Sier, Gert Richardt.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the technical advancements of the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedure, valve embolisation into the left ventricle remains a challenging situation requiring expedited management through the Heart Team. INVESTIGATION: The advantages and pitfalls of an interventional transfemoral approach, a transapical extraction of the dislocated prosthesis or the conversion to open heart surgery have to be balanced depending on the overall situation and the specific characteristics of the patient. DIAGNOSIS: A transfemoral approach would be the first choice for most TAVI implanters. We discuss the different options and present an elegant solution solving this challenging situation, leading to a good immediate and long-term outcome. MANAGEMENT: Attempts at pulling the prosthesis out of the ventricle using a balloon remained unsuccessful. After grasping of the prosthesis with a goose-neck snare, the valve was pulled into the annulus. A second SAPIEN XT prosthesis was implanted and fixed the first prosthesis within the annulus. After post-dilatation, there was a good result without relevant gradient and minimal aortic regurgitation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25244641 DOI: 10.4244/EIJY14M09_04
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EuroIntervention ISSN: 1774-024X Impact factor: 6.534