Literature DB >> 25244590

Ethnic variation in gender-STEM stereotypes and STEM participation: an intersectional approach.

Laurie T O'Brien1, Alison Blodorn2, Glenn Adams3, Donna M Garcia4, Elliott Hammer5.   

Abstract

Stereotypes associating men and masculine traits with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields are ubiquitous, but the relative strength of these stereotypes varies considerably across cultures. The present research applies an intersectional approach to understanding ethnic variation in gender-STEM stereotypes and STEM participation within an American university context. African American college women participated in STEM majors at higher rates than European American college women (Study 1, Study 2, and Study 4). Furthermore, African American women had weaker implicit gender-STEM stereotypes than European American women (Studies 2-4), and ethnic differences in implicit gender-STEM stereotypes partially mediated ethnic differences in STEM participation (Study 2 and Study 4). Although African American men had weaker implicit gender-STEM stereotypes than European American men (Study 4), ethnic differences between men in STEM participation were generally small (Study 1) or nonsignificant (Study 4). We discuss the implications of an intersectional approach for understanding the relationship between gender and STEM participation. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25244590     DOI: 10.1037/a0037944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol        ISSN: 1077-341X


  8 in total

1.  Fluctuating Team Science: Perceiving Science as Collaborative Improves Science Motivation.

Authors:  Jill Allen; Jessi L Smith; Dustin B Thoman; Ryan W Walters
Journal:  Motiv Sci       Date:  2018-03-12

2.  Males Under-Estimate Academic Performance of Their Female Peers in Undergraduate Biology Classrooms.

Authors:  Daniel Z Grunspan; Sarah L Eddy; Sara E Brownell; Benjamin L Wiggins; Alison J Crowe; Steven M Goodreau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A Social Capital Perspective on the Mentoring of Undergraduate Life Science Researchers: An Empirical Study of Undergraduate-Postgraduate-Faculty Triads.

Authors:  Melissa L Aikens; Sona Sadselia; Keiana Watkins; Mara Evans; Lillian T Eby; Erin L Dolan
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 4.  Adolescent Girls' STEM Identity Formation and Media Images of STEM Professionals: Considering the Influence of Contextual Cues.

Authors:  Jocelyn Steinke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-26

5.  Math Self-Efficacy and STEM Intentions: A Person-Centered Approach.

Authors:  Li Lin; Taehun Lee; Lori Anderson Snyder
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-23

6.  Children's evaluations of deviant peers in the context of science and technology: The role of gender group norms and status.

Authors:  Luke McGuire; Emma Jefferys; Adam Rutland
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2020-04-08

7.  Effects of Gender Bias and Stereotypes in Surgical Training: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sara P Myers; Mohini Dasari; Joshua B Brown; Stephanie T Lumpkin; Matthew D Neal; Kaleab Z Abebe; Nicole Chaumont; Stephanie M Downs-Canner; Meghan R Flanagan; Kenneth K Lee; Matthew R Rosengart
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 8.  Coping With Stigma in the Workplace: Understanding the Role of Threat Regulation, Supportive Factors, and Potential Hidden Costs.

Authors:  Colette Van Laar; Loes Meeussen; Jenny Veldman; Sanne Van Grootel; Naomi Sterk; Catho Jacobs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.