OBJECTIVE: Using disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) improves outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is a nationally endorsed quality measure. We investigated the prevalence and predictors of receiving glucocorticoids alone for the treatment of RA in a nationwide sample of Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: Among individuals ages ≥65 years with RA enrolled in the Part D prescription drug benefit in 2009, we compared those with ≥1 DMARD claim to those receiving glucocorticoid monotherapy, defined as no DMARD claim and an annual glucocorticoid supply of ≥180 days or an annual dose of ≥900 mg of prednisone or equivalent. We fit multivariable models to determine the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with glucocorticoid monotherapy. RESULTS: Of 8,125 beneficiaries treated for RA, 10.2% (n = 825) received glucocorticoids alone. Beneficiaries with low incomes were more likely to receive glucocorticoids alone (12.3%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 10.9-13.8% versus 9.4%; 95% CI 8.6-10.1%), as were those living in certain US regions. More physician office visits and hospitalizations were associated with glucocorticoid monotherapy. Individuals who had no contact with a rheumatologist were significantly more likely to receive glucocorticoids alone (17.5%; 95% CI 16.0-19.0% versus 8.5%; 95% CI 7.4-9.5% for those with no rheumatology visits versus 1-4 visits). CONCLUSION: Approximately 1 in 10 Medicare beneficiaries treated for RA received glucocorticoids without DMARDs in 2009. Compared to DMARD users, glucocorticoid users were older, had lower incomes, were more likely to live in certain US regions, and were less likely to have seen a rheumatologist, suggesting persistent gaps in quality of care despite expanded drug coverage under Part D.
OBJECTIVE: Using disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) improves outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is a nationally endorsed quality measure. We investigated the prevalence and predictors of receiving glucocorticoids alone for the treatment of RA in a nationwide sample of Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: Among individuals ages ≥65 years with RA enrolled in the Part D prescription drug benefit in 2009, we compared those with ≥1 DMARD claim to those receiving glucocorticoid monotherapy, defined as no DMARD claim and an annual glucocorticoid supply of ≥180 days or an annual dose of ≥900 mg of prednisone or equivalent. We fit multivariable models to determine the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with glucocorticoid monotherapy. RESULTS: Of 8,125 beneficiaries treated for RA, 10.2% (n = 825) received glucocorticoids alone. Beneficiaries with low incomes were more likely to receive glucocorticoids alone (12.3%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 10.9-13.8% versus 9.4%; 95% CI 8.6-10.1%), as were those living in certain US regions. More physician office visits and hospitalizations were associated with glucocorticoid monotherapy. Individuals who had no contact with a rheumatologist were significantly more likely to receive glucocorticoids alone (17.5%; 95% CI 16.0-19.0% versus 8.5%; 95% CI 7.4-9.5% for those with no rheumatology visits versus 1-4 visits). CONCLUSION: Approximately 1 in 10 Medicare beneficiaries treated for RA received glucocorticoids without DMARDs in 2009. Compared to DMARD users, glucocorticoid users were older, had lower incomes, were more likely to live in certain US regions, and were less likely to have seen a rheumatologist, suggesting persistent gaps in quality of care despite expanded drug coverage under Part D.
Authors: Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Joan M Bathon; Roy M Fleischmann; Désirée Van der Heijde; John R Tesser; Paul M Peloso; Yun Chon; Barbara White Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Daniel H Solomon; Edward Yelin; Jeffrey N Katz; Bing Lu; Tamara Shaykevich; John Z Ayanian Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2013-03-18 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Elizabeth D Ferucci; Peter Holck; Gretchen M Day; Tammy L Choromanski; Sarah L Freeman Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Christina A Spivey; Jenny Griffith; Cameron Kaplan; Arnold Postlethwaite; Arijit Ganguli; Junling Wang Journal: Rheumatol Ther Date: 2017-12-04
Authors: Beth I Wallace; Paul Lin; Neil Kamdar; Mohamed Noureldin; Rodney Hayward; David A Fox; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth G Saag; Akbar K Waljee Journal: Semin Arthritis Rheum Date: 2019-09-07 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Gabriela Schmajuk; Chris Tonner; Yinghui Miao; Jinoos Yazdany; Jacqueline Gannon; W John Boscardin; David I Daikh; Michael A Steinman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christina A Spivey; Kevin L Winthrop; Jenny Griffith; Cameron M Kaplan; Yanru Qiao; Arnold E Postlethwaite; Junling Wang Journal: Rheumatol Ther Date: 2019-11-18
Authors: Christine G Parks; Jane A Hoppin; Anneclaire J De Roos; Karen H Costenbader; Michael C Alavanja; Dale P Sandler Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 9.031