Literature DB >> 25244252

Realising opportunities for evidence-based cancer service delivery and research: linking cancer registry and administrative data in Australia.

D M Roder1, K M Fong, M P Brown, J Zalcberg, C E Wainwright.   

Abstract

The traditional roles of Australian cancer registries have been incidence, mortality and survival surveillance although increasingly, roles are being broadened to include data support for health-service management and evaluation. In some Australian jurisdictions, cancer stage and other prognostic data are being included in registry databases and this is being facilitated by an increase in structured pathology reporting by pathology and haematology laboratories. Data linkage facilities are being extended across the country at national and jurisdictional level, facilitating data linkage between registry data and data extracts from administrative databases that include treatment, screening and vaccination data, and self-reported data from large population cohorts. Well-established linkage protocols exist to protect privacy. The aim is to gain better data on patterns of care, service outcomes and related performance indicators for health-service management and population health and health-services research, at a time of increasing cost pressures. Barriers include wariness among some data custodians towards releasing data and the need for clearance for data release from large numbers of research ethics committees. Progress is being made though, and proof of concept is being established.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer registries; data access; data linkage; health-service management; privacy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25244252     DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  4 in total

Review 1.  Does standardised structured reporting contribute to quality in diagnostic pathology? The importance of evidence-based datasets.

Authors:  D W Ellis; J Srigley
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Cancer survivorship monitoring systems for the collection of patient-reported outcomes: a systematic narrative review of international approaches.

Authors:  N Corsini; J Fish; I Ramsey; G Sharplin; I Flight; R Damarell; B Wiggins; C Wilson; D Roder; M Eckert
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Occurrence and timely management of problems requiring prompt intervention among Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous Australian palliative care patients: a multijurisdictional cohort study.

Authors:  John A Woods; Judith M Katzenellenbogen; Kevin Murray; Claire E Johnson; Sandra C Thompson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Augmenting cancer registry data with health survey data with no cases in common: the relationship between pre-diagnosis health behaviour and post-diagnosis survival in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Paul P Fahey; Andrew Page; Glenn Stone; Thomas Astell-Burt
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.