Literature DB >> 25244086

Nucleus accumbens core neurons encode value-independent associations necessary for sensory preconditioning.

Domenic H Cerri1, Michael P Saddoris1, Regina M Carelli1,2.   

Abstract

Reinforcement-based learning models predict that the strength of association between cues and outcomes is driven by aspects of outcome value. However, animals routinely make associations between contingent stimuli in the world, even if those associations hold no value to the organism. At the neural level, the nucleus accumbens (NAc) is known to encode associative information, but it is not known whether this encoding is specific for value-based information (consistent with reinforcement-based models) or if the NAc additionally plays a more general role in forming predictive associations, independent of outcome value. To test this, we employed a sensory preconditioning (SPC) task where rats initially (Preconditioning) received either contingent pairings of 2 neutral stimuli (e.g., tone [A] and light [X]; "Paired"), or random noncontingent presentations ("Unpaired"). After cue X was subsequently conditioned with food (First-Order Conditioning), the effect of preconditioning was assessed in Phase 3 (Test) by presentations of cue A alone. Electrophysiological recordings from the NAc core showed significant increases in phasic encoding for the stimuli in the Paired (but not Unpaired) condition as well as during test. Further, these effects were only seen in Paired rats that showed successful behavior during test (Good Learners), but not those who did not (Poor Learners) or Unpaired controls. These findings reveal a role for the NAc in the encoding of associative contingencies independent of value, and suggest that this structure also plays a more general role in forming associations necessary for predictive behavior. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25244086      PMCID: PMC4176687          DOI: 10.1037/a0037797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  40 in total

1.  Influence of phasic and tonic dopamine release on receptor activation.

Authors:  Jakob K Dreyer; Kjartan F Herrik; Rune W Berg; Jørn D Hounsgaard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Lesions of the basolateral amygdala disrupt conditioning based on the retrieved representations of motivationally significant events.

Authors:  Dominic M Dwyer; Simon Killcross
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex contribution to behavioral and nucleus accumbens neuronal responses to incentive cues.

Authors:  Akinori Ishikawa; Frederic Ambroggi; Saleem M Nicola; Howard L Fields
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex are both required for model-based, but not model-free, reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Michael A McDannald; Federica Lucantonio; Kathryn A Burke; Yael Niv; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Ventral striatal neurons encode the value of the chosen action in rats deciding between differently delayed or sized rewards.

Authors:  Matthew R Roesch; Teghpal Singh; P Leon Brown; Sylvina E Mullins; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Heteromerization of dopamine D2 receptors with dopamine D1 or D5 receptors generates intracellular calcium signaling by different mechanisms.

Authors:  Ahmed Hasbi; Brian F O'Dowd; Susan R George
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 5.547

7.  Neural encoding of cocaine-seeking behavior is coincident with phasic dopamine release in the accumbens core and shell.

Authors:  Catarina A Owesson-White; Jennifer Ariansen; Garret D Stuber; Nathan A Cleaveland; Joseph F Cheer; R Mark Wightman; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Opposing patterns of signaling activation in dopamine D1 and D2 receptor-expressing striatal neurons in response to cocaine and haloperidol.

Authors:  Jesus Bertran-Gonzalez; Clémentine Bosch; Matthieu Maroteaux; Miriam Matamales; Denis Hervé; Emmanuel Valjent; Jean-Antoine Girault
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Nucleus accumbens neurons encode Pavlovian approach behaviors: evidence from an autoshaping paradigm.

Authors:  Jeremy J Day; Robert A Wheeler; Mitchell F Roitman; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Associative learning mediates dynamic shifts in dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Jeremy J Day; Mitchell F Roitman; R Mark Wightman; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  7 in total

1.  Threat and Bidirectional Valence Signaling in the Nucleus Accumbens Core.

Authors:  Madelyn H Ray; Mahsa Moaddab; Michael A McDannald
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Orbitofrontal lesions eliminate signalling of biological significance in cue-responsive ventral striatal neurons.

Authors:  Nisha K Cooch; Thomas A Stalnaker; Heather M Wied; Sheena Bali-Chaudhary; Michael A McDannald; Tzu-Lan Liu; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Adolescent Emotional Maturation through Divergent Models of Brain Organization.

Authors:  Jose V Oron Semper; Jose I Murillo; Javier Bernacer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-23

4.  Orbitofrontal neurons signal sensory associations underlying model-based inference in a sensory preconditioning task.

Authors:  Brian F Sadacca; Heather M Wied; Nina Lopatina; Gurpreet K Saini; Daniel Nemirovsky; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Basolateral Amygdala to Nucleus Accumbens Communication Differentially Mediates Devaluation Sensitivity of Sign- and Goal-Tracking Rats.

Authors:  Daniel E Kochli; Sara E Keefer; Utsav Gyawali; Donna J Calu
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Responding to preconditioned cues is devaluation sensitive and requires orbitofrontal cortex during cue-cue learning.

Authors:  Evan E Hart; Melissa J Sharpe; Matthew Ph Gardner; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  The prediction-error hypothesis of schizophrenia: new data point to circuit-specific changes in dopamine activity.

Authors:  Samuel J Millard; Carrie E Bearden; Katherine H Karlsgodt; Melissa J Sharpe
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 7.853

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.