| Literature DB >> 25244080 |
Lihong Fan1, Jia Li1, Zefeng Yu1, Xiaoqian Dang1, Kunzheng Wang1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the preventive effect of hemical">ethyl 3,4-dihydroxybenzoate(<hemical">span class="Chemical">EDHB) on steroid-associated femoral head osteonecrosis(ONFH) in a rabbit model. New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into two groups (prevention group and model group), each containing 24 rabbits. Osteonecrosis was induced by lipopolysaccharide(LPS) combined with methylprednisolone(MPS). The prevention group received an intraperitoneal injection of EDHB at 50 mg/kg body weight every other day starting three days before establishing rabbit models of osteonecrosis, for a total of nine doses. Osteonecrosis was verified by haematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. The expression of HIF-1α and VEGF was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Angiogenesis, apoptosis and microstructural parameters were also analyzed. The rabbit models of osteonecrosis were successfully established and observed by HE staining. Histopathological observations indicated that EDHB reduced the rate of empty lacunae and the incidence of osteonecrosis. Immunohistochemical staining for HIF-1α and VEGF suggested that EDHB therapy inhibited degradation of HIF-1α and promoted expression of VEGF. Ink artery infusion angiography and microvessel density analysis revealed that there were more microvessels in the prevention group than in the model group. The TUNEL apoptosis assay suggested that EDHB intervention could reduce the number of apoptotic cells in avascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Micro-CT scanning indicated that the treatment group had better microstructural parameters than the model group. EDHB prevents steroid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral head in rabbits by promoting angiogenesis and inhibiting apoptosis of bone cells and hematopoietic tissue.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25244080 PMCID: PMC4171501 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Histopathological observations (200×magnification).
(A). Obvious osteonecrosis was observed in the model group. Osteocytes in the bone trabeculae showed pyknosis and empty lacunae. (B). The diameter of fat cells in the marrow of the model group significantly increased. (C). In the prevention group, fewer empty lacunae were observed. (D). Compared with the model group, the diameter of fat cells in the prevention group decreased. (E and F). Bar graph shows the rate of empty lacunae and diameter of fat cells. Both the rate of empty lacunae and diameter of fat cells in the prevention group was significantly lower than that in the model group and the significance was statistically significant(P<0.05). The asterisk (*) shows statistically significant difference between the two groups. Empty lacunae and enlarged fat cells are shown by arrows.
Figure 2Immunohistochemical staining and semi-quantitative analysis of HIF-1α and VEGF expression(200×magnification).
HIF-1α and VEGF immunoreactivity were mainly observed in the osteoblasts and endothelial cells in both groups. (A). In the model group, weak immunoreactivity of HIF-1αwas found in the osteoblasts and endothelial cells. (B). After treatment with EDHB, the osteoblasts and endothelial cells showed a significantly high level of HIF-1αimmunoreactivity in the prevention group. (C) and (F). Bar graphs represent the mean optical density of HIF-1α and VEGF in bone marrow. Semi-quantitative analysis was based on at least 10 fields per section. The asterisk (*) shows statistically significant difference between the groups. (D). In the model group, weak immunoreactivity of VEGF was found in the osteoblasts and endothelial cells. (E). After treatment with EDHB, the osteoblasts and endothelial cells showed a significantly high level of VEGF immunoreactivity in the prevention group.
Figure 3Ink artery infusion angiography of the femoral head and the ratio of perfusion.
(A). Few blood vessels were found in the model group. (B). Compared with the model group, the prevention group had more ink-stained blood vessels. (C). Bar graph shows the ratio of perfusion in the femoral head. The ratio of perfusion in the prevention group was significantly higher than that in the model group. The asterisk (*) shows statistically significant differences between the two groups.
Figure 4Immunohistochemical staining of CD31(200×magnification) and quantification of microvessel density.
(A). There were only a few microvessels in the subchondral bone of the necrotic femoral heads in the model group. (B). The prevention group showed increased microvessel density after EDHB treatment. (C). Bar graph shows the comparison between the model group and the prevention group. The microvessel density in the prevention group was significantly higher than that in the model group(P<0.05). The asterisk (*) shows statistically significant differences between the two groups. The arrows pointed to a lot of microvessel in the prevention group.
Figure 5TUNEL apoptosis detection(200×magnification).
(A). Extensive TUNEL-positive cells, including osteocytes, chondrocytes and bone-marrow cells were observed in the femoral heads of the model group. (B). In the prevention group, relatively lower numbers of apoptotic cells were observed. (C). Bar graph shows the comparison of apoptotic rate between the model group and the prevention group. In the prevention group, the apoptotic rate was significantly lower than that in the model group(P<0.05). The asterisk (*) shows statistically significant differences between the two groups. The arrows indicated TUNEL-positive cells.
Figure 6Immunohistochemical staining and semi-quantitative analysis of caspase-3 and Bcl-2(200×magnification).
Caspase-3 and Bcl-2 immunoreactivity were observed in the cell cytoplasm of cartilage, trabecular bone and bone marrow. (A). In the model group, relatively high immunoreactivity of caspase-3 was observed. (B). In the prevention group, weak immunoreactivity of caspase-3 was found. (C) and (F). Bar graphs represent the mean optical density of caspase-3 and Bcl-2 in bone marrow. Semi-quantitative analysis was based on at least 10 fields per section. The asterisk (*) shows statistically significant differences between the two groups. (D). In the model group, low immunoreactivity of Bcl-2 was observed. (E). In the prevention group, higher immunoreactivity of Bcl-2 was found.
Figure 7Representative three-dimensional micro-CT scanning images.
(A). A region of interest(ROI) in the center of the femoral head was selected. (B). The magnified region of interest(ROI) in the femoral head of the model group. It showed that the trabecular bone in the model group was irregular and relatively thin. (C). The magnified region of interest(ROI) in the femoral head of the prevention group. The ROI in the prevention group showed better three-dimensional structure and structural integrity of the trabecular bone.
The comparison of microstructural parameters of region of interest in the femoral head.
| Microstructural parameters | BMD | TMD | BVF | Tb.N | Tb.Th | Tb.Sp |
| Model group(n = 10) | 362.92±20.79 | 617.56±12.91 | 27.07±4.36 | 2.91±0.19 | 0.091±0.013 | 0.245±0.031 |
| Prevention group(n = 10) | 402.04±31.07 | 632.79±13.70 | 32.12±3.62 | 3.13±0.18 | 0.105±0.013 | 0.210±0.028 |
| Statistical significance | P<0.01 | P<0.05 | P<0.05 | P<0.05 | P<0.05 | P<0.05 |
BMD, bone mineral density, expressed as mg/cm3; TMD, tissue mineral density, expressed as mg/cm3; BVF, bone volume fraction, bone volume/total volume of bone, expressed as a percent; Tb.N, trabecular number, expressed as 1/mm; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness, expressed as mm; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation, expressed as mm.
Statistical significance was evaluated by independent-samples t test.