| Literature DB >> 25244067 |
Elisângela Düsman1, Igor Vivian de Almeida1, Luciano Lucchetta2, Veronica Elisa Pimenta Vicentini1.
Abstract
The juices of grapes (Vitis labrusca L.) are similar to the fruit itself because the main constituents of the fruit are present in the juice. However, their quality characteristics may be modified by the harsh technological processes used for the production of integral food, such as production systems of raw materials and post-harvest treatment of grapes with ultraviolet (UV) irradiation. Therefore, the present study analyzed juices produced naturally (by liquefying the fruit) or by the technological process of extraction by steam distillation (90°C) of grapes from organic and conventional production systems that were untreated or treated with UV type C (65.6 J/m² for 10 minutes). Using cultures of Rattus norvegicus hepatoma cells (HTC) in vitro, cytotoxic effects were assayed by the MTT test and by calculating the cytokinesis blocked proliferation index (CBPI), and mutagenic effects were measured by the cytokinesis block micronucleus assay. The results of the MTT assay and the CBPIs indicated that none of the juices were cytotoxic, including those that induced cell proliferation. The results of the micronucleus assay showed that none of the juices were mutagenic. However, the average number of micronuclei was lower in the juices produced from organic grapes, and cell proliferation, soluble acids and phenolic compounds were significantly higher. Compared with the natural juices, the integral juices of conventional grapes showed a higher average number of micronuclei as well as lower stimulation of cell proliferation and lower levels of bioactive compounds. The results demonstrate a beneficial effect of UV-C irradiation of post-harvest grapes in stimulating the synthesis of nutraceutical compounds without generating cytotoxic or mutagenic substances. Taken together, our findings support the consumption of grape juice and the application of food production techniques that enhance its nutritional value and promote its production, marketing and consumption.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25244067 PMCID: PMC4171489 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107974
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1HTC binucleated cells with micronuclei (arrow) (A and B).
Figure 2Mononucleated (A), binucleate (B) and multinucleate HTC cells (C).
Average value and standard deviation (SD) of the absorbance in the MTT cytotoxicity test using HTC cells treated with methyl methanesulfonate (150 µM) or integral and natural juices of conventional and organic grapes at concentrations 2, 10, 20, 30 and 40 µL/mL and untreated or treated with UV-C or the negative control group (20 µL PBS/mL).
| Groups | Percentage of Cell Proliferation ±SD) | |||
| Conventional Grapes | Organic Grapes | |||
| Control | 100±9.89 | 100±26.31 | ||
| Methyl methanesulfonate | 16.48±2.19a | 26.31±3.50a | ||
| 2 µL/mL | 69.23±12.08 | 82.45±14.03 | ||
| 10 µL/mL | 103.29±26.37 | 110.52±14.03 | ||
| Untreated UV-C | 20 µL/mL | 101.09±27.47 | 133.33±21.05 | |
| 30 µL/mL | 123.37±30.76 | 156.14±43.85 | ||
| Integral Juice | 40 µL/mL | 126.37±40.65 | 149.12±49.12 | |
| 2 µL/mL | 118.68±24.17 | 142.10±29.82 | ||
| 10 µL/mL | 116.48±20.87 | 143.85±24.56 | ||
| Treated UV-C | 20 µL/mL | 124.17±31.86 | 121.05±22.80 | |
| 30 µL/mL | 115.38±28.57 | 107.01±22.80 | ||
| 40 µL/mL | 129.67±26.37 | 108.77±42.10 | ||
| Control | 100±16.16 | 100±18.36 | ||
| Methyl methanesulfonate | 19.19±2.02a | 16.32±2.04a | ||
| 2 µL/mL | 114.14±29.29 | 71.42±8.16 | ||
| 10 µL/mL | 128.28±23.23 | 116.32±15.30 | ||
| Untreated UV-C | 20 µL/mL | 132.32±23.23 | 128.57±15.30 | |
| 30 µL/mL | 134.34±23.23 | 133.67±16.32 | ||
| Natural Juice | 40 µL/mL | 134.34±18.18 | 143.87±13.26ae | |
| 2 µL/mL | 55.55±22.22 | 112.24±23.46 | ||
| 10 µL/mL | 90.90±37.37 | 125.51±18.36 | ||
| Treated UV-C | 20 µL/mL | 108.08±35.35 | 129.59±15.30 | |
| 30 µL/mL | 129.29±32.32 | 129.59±19.38 | ||
| 40 µL/mL | 138.38±18.18cd | 127.55±22.44 | ||
n = 3; 2.0×104 cells per well.
Statistically significant result relative to the negative control.
Statistically significant result relative to the treatment with 2 µL/mL integral juice of UV-untreated grapes.
Statistically significant result relative to the treatment with 2 µL/mL natural juice of UV-C-treated grapes.
Statistically significant result relative to the treatment with 10 µL/mL natural juice of UV-C-treated grapes.
Statistically significant result relative to the treatment with 2 µL/mL natural juice of UV-untreated grapes.
Figure 3Average and standard deviation of the number of micronucleated cells (MN) (columns) and of the cytokinesis blocked proliferation index (CBPI) (line) for HTC cells treated for 24 hours.
Negative control group (CO): 20 µL PBS/mL; Doxorubicin (Dox): 0.2 µg/mL; Integral and natural juice of conventional and organic grapes treated or untreated with UV-C: 2, 10 and 20 µL/mL. n = 3; 106 cells per flask. a Statistically significant result relative to the negative control. b Statistically significant result relative to the treatment with 2 µL/mL integral juice of UV-untreated conventional grapes. c Statistically significant result relative to the treatment with 10 µL/mL integral juice of UV-untreated conventional grapes. d Statistically significant result relative to the treatment with 20 µL/mL integral juice of UV-untreated conventional grapes. e Statistically significant result relative to the treatment with 2 µL/mL integral juice of UV-C-treated conventional grapes. f Statistically significant result relative to the treatment with 20 µL/mL integral juice of UV-C-treated conventional grapes.