Literature DB >> 25243771

Double Sequential External Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation: A Report of Ten Cases.

José G Cabañas, J Brent Myers, Jefferson G Williams, Valerie J De Maio, Michael W Bachman.   

Abstract

Abstract Background. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) is considered the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) rhythm with the highest likelihood of neurologically intact survival. Unfortunately, there are occasions when VF does not respond to standard defibrillatory shocks. Current American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines acknowledge that the data are insufficient in determining the optimal pad placement, waveform, or energy level that produce the best conversion rates from OOHCA with VF. Objective. To describe a technique of double sequential external defibrillation (DSED) for cases of refractory VF (RVF) during OOHCA resuscitation. Methods. A retrospective case series was performed in an urban/suburban emergency medical services (EMS) system with advanced life support care and a population of 900,000. Included were all adult OOHCAs having RVF during resuscitation efforts by EMS providers. RVF was defined as persistent VF following at least 5 unsuccessful single shocks, epinephrine administration, and a dose of antiarrhythmic medication. Once the patient was in RVF, EMS personnel applied a second set of pads and utilized a second defibrillator for single defibrillation with the new monitor/pad placement. If VF continued, EMS personnel then utilized the original and second monitor/defibrillator charged to maximum energy, and shocks were delivered from both machines simultaneously. Data were collected from electronic dispatch and patient care reports for descriptive analysis. Results. From 01/07/2008 to 12/31/2010, a total of 10 patients were treated with DSED. The median age was 76.5 (IQR: 65-82), with median resuscitation time of 51minutes (IQR: 45-62). The median number of single shocks was 6.5 (IQR: 6-11), with a median of 2 (IQR: 1-3) DSED shocks delivered. VF broke after DSED in 7 cases (70%). Only 3 patients (30%) had ROSC in the field, and none survived to discharge. Conclusion. This case series demonstrates that DSED may be a feasible technique as part of an aggressive treatment plan for RVF in the out-of-hospital setting. In this series, RVF was terminated 70% of the time, but no patient survived to discharge. Further research is needed to better understand the characteristics of and treatment strategies for RVF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac arrest; defibrillation; double sequential; out-of-hospital; ventricular fibrillation

Year:  2014        PMID: 25243771     DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2014.942476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  7 in total

1.  First Report of Survival in Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation After Dual-Axis Defibrillation and Esmolol Administration.

Authors:  Kevin M Boehm; Daniel C Keyes; Laura E Mader; J Michelle Moccia
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-10-20

2.  Prehospital Double Defibrillation for Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation: A Scoping Review Protocol.

Authors:  Dennis Miraglia; Lourdes A Miguel
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2020-06-15

3.  Double Sequence Defibrillation for Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: Unlikely Survival.

Authors:  Andrew Zabel; James R Bence; Kyle Couperus
Journal:  Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med       Date:  2018-08-15

4.  A survey of the incidence of defibrillator damage during double sequential external defibrillation for refractory ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Ian R Drennan; Dustin Seidler; Sheldon Cheskes
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2022-09-06

Review 5.  [Adult advanced life support].

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Pierre Carli; Keith Couper; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Carsten Lott; Theresa Olasveengen; Peter Paal; Tommaso Pellis; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 0.826

6.  Adult Advanced Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Katherine M Berg; Lars W Andersen; Bernd W Böttiger; Sofia Cacciola; Clifton W Callaway; Keith Couper; Tobias Cronberg; Sonia D'Arrigo; Charles D Deakin; Michael W Donnino; Ian R Drennan; Asger Granfeldt; Cornelia W E Hoedemaekers; Mathias J Holmberg; Cindy H Hsu; Marlijn Kamps; Szymon Musiol; Kevin J Nation; Robert W Neumar; Tonia Nicholson; Brian J O'Neil; Quentin Otto; Edison Ferreira de Paiva; Michael J A Parr; Joshua C Reynolds; Claudio Sandroni; Barnaby R Scholefield; Markus B Skrifvars; Tzong-Luen Wang; Wolfgang A Wetsch; Joyce Yeung; Peter T Morley; Laurie J Morrison; Michelle Welsford; Mary Fran Hazinski; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  2020 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Part 4. Adult advanced life support.

Authors:  Jaehoon Oh; Kyoung-Chul Cha; Jong-Hwan Lee; Seungmin Park; Dong-Hyeok Kim; Byung Kook Lee; Jung Soo Park; Woo Jin Jung; Dong Keon Lee; Young Il Roh; Tae Youn Kim; Sung Phil Chung; Young-Min Kim; June Dong Park; Han-Suk Kim; Mi Jin Lee; Sang-Hoon Na; Gyu Chong Cho; Ai-Rhan Ellen Kim; Sung Oh Hwang
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.