Literature DB >> 25243477

Predicting support for non-pharmaceutical interventions during infectious outbreaks: a four region analysis.

Francesca Matthews Pillemer1, Robert J Blendon, Alan M Zaslavsky, Bruce Y Lee.   

Abstract

Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are an important public health tool for responding to infectious disease outbreaks, including pandemics. However, little is known about the individual characteristics associated with support for NPIs, or whether they are consistent across regions. This study draws on survey data from four regions--Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, and the United States--collected following the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak of 2002-03, and employs regression techniques to estimate predictors of NPI support. It finds that characteristics associated with NPI support vary widely by region, possibly because of cultural variation and prior experience, and that minority groups tend to be less supportive of NPIs when arrest is the consequence of noncompliance. Prior experience of face-mask usage also results in increased support for future usage, as well as other NPIs. Policymakers should be attentive to local preferences and to the application of compulsory interventions. It is speculated here that some public health interventions may serve as 'gateway' exposures to future public health interventions.
© 2014 RAND Corporation. Disasters © 2014 Overseas Development Institute.

Entities:  

Keywords:  compulsory; epidemic; non-pharmaceutical interventions; pandemic; public health tool; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25243477      PMCID: PMC4355939          DOI: 10.1111/disa.12089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disasters        ISSN: 0361-3666


  46 in total

1.  Americans' views on health policy: a fifty-year historical perspective.

Authors:  R J Blendon; J M Benson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 2.  Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Fothergill; E G Maestas; J D Darlington
Journal:  Disasters       Date:  1999-06

3.  Risk perception and compliance with quarantine during the SARS outbreak.

Authors:  Maureen A Cava; Krissa E Fay; Heather J Beanlands; Elizabeth A McCay; Rouleen Wignall
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.176

4.  Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Neil M Ferguson; Derek A T Cummings; Simon Cauchemez; Christophe Fraser; Steven Riley; Aronrag Meeyai; Sopon Iamsirithaworn; Donald S Burke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Containing pandemic influenza at the source.

Authors:  Ira M Longini; Azhar Nizam; Shufu Xu; Kumnuan Ungchusak; Wanna Hanshaoworakul; Derek A T Cummings; M Elizabeth Halloran
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Confidence in crisis? Understanding trust in government and public attitudes toward mandatory state health powers.

Authors:  Kalahn Taylor-Clark; Robert J Blendon; Alan Zaslavsky; John Benson
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2005

7.  What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs.

Authors:  L J Frewer; C Howard; D Hedderley; R Shepherd
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.000

8.  Potential impact of antiviral drug use during influenza pandemic.

Authors:  Raymond Gani; Helen Hughes; Douglas Fleming; Thomas Griffin; Jolyon Medlock; Steve Leach
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Targeted social distancing design for pandemic influenza.

Authors:  Robert J Glass; Laura M Glass; Walter E Beyeler; H Jason Min
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Crisis prevention and management during SARS outbreak, Singapore.

Authors:  Stella R Quah; Lee Hin-Peng
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Mask use during COVID-19: A risk adjusted strategy.

Authors:  Jiao Wang; Lijun Pan; Song Tang; John S Ji; Xiaoming Shi
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Non-pharmaceutical Interventions for Pandemic COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Investigation of US General Public Beliefs, Attitudes, and Actions.

Authors:  Bella Nichole Kantor; Jonathan Kantor
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-07-03

3.  The 2019 coronavirus: Learning curves, lessons, and the weakest link.

Authors:  Richard Albert Stein
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  COVID-19 observations and accompanying dataset of non-pharmaceutical interventions across U.S. universities, March 2020.

Authors:  Kevin E Cevasco; Hayley M North; Sheryne A Zeitoun; Rachel N Wofford; Graham A Matulis; Abigail F Gregory; Maha H Hassan; Aya D Abdo; David Farris; Amira A Roess; Michael E von Fricken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Low acuity paediatric emergency visits under single-payer universal health insurance in Taiwan, 2000-2015: a population-based repeated cross-sectional design.

Authors:  I-Anne Huang; Yiing-Jenq Chou; I-Jun Chou; Yu-Tung Huang; Jhen-Ling Huang; Tang-Her Jaing; Chang-Teng Wu; Hsiang-Ju Hsiao; Nicole Huang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Worry and behaviour at the start of the COVID-19 outbreak: Results from three UK surveys (the COVID-19 rapid survey of Adherence to Interventions and responses [CORSAIR] study).

Authors:  Louise E Smith; Henry W W Potts; Richard Amlȏt; Nicola T Fear; Susan Michie; G James Rubin
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-12-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.