| Literature DB >> 25243179 |
Chiara Botti, Botti Chiara1, Ilaria Caiafa, Caiafa Ilaria2, Antonietta Coppola, Coppola Antonietta2, Francesca Cuomo, Cuomo Francesca2, Marco Miceli, Miceli Marco3, Lucia Altucci, Altucci Lucia4, Gilda Cobellis5, Cobellis Gilda.
Abstract
Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) are attractive for clinical and experimental purposes due to their capability of self-renewal and of differentiating into several cell types. Autologous hMSCs transplantation has been proven to induce therapeutic angiogenesis in ischemic disorders. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. A recent report has connected MSCs multipotency to sirtuin families, showing that SIRT1 can regulate MSCs function. Furthermore, SIRT1 is a critical modulator of endothelial angiogenic functions. Here, we described the generation of an immortalized human mesenchymal bone marrow-derived cell line and we investigated the angiogenic phenotype of our cellular model by inhibiting SIRT1 by both the genetic and pharmacological level. We first assessed the expression of SIRT1 in hMSCs under basal and hypoxic conditions at both RNA and protein level. Inhibition of SIRT1 by sirtinol, a cell-permeable inhibitor, or by specific sh-RNA resulted in an increase of premature-senescence phenotype, a reduction of proliferation rate with increased apoptosis. Furthermore, we observed a consistent reduction of tubule-like formation and migration and we found that SIRT1 inhibition reduced the hypoxia induced accumulation of HIF-1α protein and its transcriptional activity in hMSCs. Our findings identify SIRT1 as regulator of hypoxia-induced response in hMSCs and may contribute to the development of new therapeutic strategies to improve regenerative properties of mesenchymal stem cells in ischemic disorders through SIRT1 modulation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25243179 PMCID: PMC4163475 DOI: 10.1155/2014/783459
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1SIRT1–SIRT7 expression in hMSCs and effects of SIRT1 inhibition on phenotype. (a) SIRT1–SIRT7 mRNA levels were measured by real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analyses of total RNAs obtained from hMSCs exposed to either 21% O2 (N) or 1% O2 (H) for 24 h and relative expression (±SD) were shown. (b) Western blot analysis of hMSCs grown at either 21% O2 (N) or 1% O2 (H) for 24 h under normal conditions (upper panel) and serum-starved (lower panel). Antibodies against SIRT1 and tubulin were used. (c) Morphological changes in hMSCs were examined 8 days after treatment with sirtinol (50 and 100 μM) for 24 h (40x magnification, scale bars = 50 μm). (d) Representative photographs of blue-stained cells for SA-β-Gal activity are shown (10x magnification, scale bars = 200 μm) at 8 days after sirtinol (50 and 100 μM) treatment compared to control (CTR). (e) SA-β-Gal-positive cells were quantified by counting in at least 3 random fields for each condition. Results show the mean of three independent experiments. Graph represents means ± SD, n = 3. ∗ indicates statistical significance from control, P ≤ 0.05.
Figure 2Effects of SIRT1 inhibition on proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis. (a) hMSCs were treated with sirtinol 100 μM (black bars) or equivalent concentration of DMSO (white bars) for 24, 48, and 72 h. (b) sh-Sirt1 infected hMSCs were plated and proliferation was measured for 24, 48, and 72 h. Each histogram indicates the RLUs# related to cell growth measured at different times. Error bars represent SD of n = 3. ∗ denotes statistical differences when P ≤ 0.05 is compared to control. (c) hMSCs were treated with sirtinol 100 μM or equivalent concentration of DMSO for 24, 48, and 72 h. The cells stained with propidium iodide (PI) were subjected to flow cytometric analysis to determine the cell distributions at each phase of the cell cycle. #RLUs are relative light units (RLUs) related to ATP cellular level.
Figure 3Effects of SIRT1 inhibition on migration and capillary tube network formation. (a) hMSCs were treated with sirtinol 100 μM (black bars) or equivalent concentration of DMSO (white bars) for 24, 48, and 72 h. (b) sh-Sirt1-hMSCs migration (black bars) compared to control (white bars) at 24, 48, and 72 h. Each histogram indicates the % of migrated cells measured at different times. Statistical differences were denoted with ∗ when P ≤ 0.05 is compared to control. (c) Tubule formation promoted by hMSCs treated with sirtinol (50 and 100 μM) (upper panel) and tubular structures of sh-Sirt1 infected hMSCs plated on Matrigel compared to control (lower panel). Magnification 10x. Scale bar = 200 μm. (d) Tubule formation was quantified by counting the number of branch points of the capillary network. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ∗ denotes statistical differences when P ≤ 0.05 is compared to control.
Figure 4Effects of sirtinol on SIRT1 expression and HIF-1α. (a) hMSCs were treated with sirtinol (100 μM) or equivalent concentration of DMSO (CTR) for 24 h and then exposed to 1% O2 for 6 h. All cells lysates were analyzed for SIRT1, HIF-1α, and tubulin by Western blot. (b) The amounts of SIRT1, VEGF, and GLUT1 mRNA of hMSCs treated with sirtinol at concentration of 100 μM (black bars) or equivalent concentration of DMSO (white bars) for 24 h and exposed to 1% O2 (H) for 6 h were quantified with real-time PCR. The levels of SIRT1, VEGF, and GLUT1 mRNA of hMSCs exposed to 21% O2 (N) for 24 h were measured. ∗ indicates statistical significance from control, P ≤ 0.05.