| Literature DB >> 25242964 |
Yun-Gang Jiang1, Chu-Yan Wang2, Chao Jin1, Jun-Qiang Jia3, Xijie Guo3, Guo-Zheng Zhang3, Zhong-Zheng Gui3.
Abstract
DNJ, an inhibitor of α-glucosidase, is used to suppress the elevation of postprandial hyperglycemia. In this study, we focus on screening an appropriate microorganism for performing fermentation to improve DNJ content in mulberry leaf. Results showed that Ganoderma lucidum was selected from 8 species and shown to be the most effective in improvement of DNJ production from mulberry leaves through fermentation. Based on single factor and three factor influence level tests by following the Plackett-Burman design, the optimum extraction yield was analyzed by response surface methodology (RSM). The extracted DNJ was determined by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatograph equipped with fluorescence detector (HPLC-FD). The results of RSM showed that the optimal condition for mulberry fermentation was defined as pH 6.97, potassium nitrate content 0.81% and inoculums volume 2 mL. The extraction efficiency reached to 0.548% in maximum which is 2.74 fold of those in mulberry leaf.Entities:
Keywords: DNJ Production; fermentation; microorganisms; mulberry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25242964 PMCID: PMC4166305 DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000200048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
The analysis of Plackett-Burman design in twelve parallel assays.
| Source | Factor | −1 | +1 | Probability of T-test absolute value | Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fermentation time / day | 2 | 2.5 | 0.066279 | 5 | |
| Content of carbon source / % | 1 | 1.25 | 0.096601 | 8 | |
| Inoculation volume / mL | 1 | 1.25 | 0.062750 | 3 | |
| Ratio of material to solution | 5 | 6.25 | 0.093976 | 7 | |
| Fermentation Temperature / °C | 25 | 31.25 | 0.064036 | 4 | |
| Range of pH value | 6.4 | 8.0 | 0.043727 | 1 | |
| Content of nitrogen source / % | 0.61 | 0.76 | 0.048903 | 2 | |
| Rotation per minute of flask | 144 |
Figure 1HPLC-RD analysis of the derivatized 1-deoxynojirimycin (DNJ). (1a) HPLC-RD chromatogram of blank. (1b) HPLC-RD chromatogram of standard DNJ. (1c) HPLC-RD chromatogram of mulberry DNJ. The retention time of three typical peaks (DNJ-FMOC, Gly-FMOC and FMOC-OH) was discrepancy appreciably.
Figure 2DNJ production from mulberry leave fermented by different peculiar species. 1 Control, 2 Candida tropicalis, 3 Cordyceps sinensis (Berk.) Sacc, 4 Ganoderma lucidu, 5 Phellinus igniarius (L.ex Fr.) Quel, 6 Ganoderma applanatum (Pers. Ex Wallr) Pat, 7 Schizophyllum commune Franch, 8 Cordyceps militaris, 9 Antrodia camphorata.
Single factor assays and determination index (extraction rate, y) with different combination of the range of pH value (X), content of potassium nitrate (X) and the inoculum volume (X).
| Order | Factor value | Extraction rate (y, %) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 1 | 6.0(−2) | 0.6(−1) | 1.0(−1) | 0.1672 |
| 2 | 6.5(−1) | 0.6(−1) | 1.0(−1) | 0.1653 |
| 3 | 7.0(0) | 0.6(−1) | 1.0(−1) | 0.1916 |
| 4 | 7.5(1) | 0.6(−1) | 1.0(−1) | 0.0949 |
| 5 | 8.0(2) | 0.6(−1) | 1.0(−1) | 0.0988 |
| 6 | 6.5(−1) | 0.4(−2) | 1.0(−1) | 0.0724 |
| 7 | 6.5(−1) | 0.6(−1) | 1.0(−1) | 0.2579 |
| 8 | 6.5(−1) | 0.8(0) | 1.0(−1) | 0.3157 |
| 9 | 6.5(−1) | 1.0(1) | 1.0(−1) | 0.2016 |
| 10 | 6.5(−1) | 1.5(2) | 1.0(−1) | 0.1067 |
| 11 | 6.5(−1) | 0.6(−1) | 0.5(−2) | 0.1178 |
| 12 | 6.5(−1) | 0.6(−1) | 1.0(−1) | 0.1249 |
| 13 | 6.5(−1) | 0.6(−1) | 1.5(0) | 0.1334 |
| 14 | 6.5(−1) | 0.6(−1) | 2.0(1) | 0.2088 |
| 15 | 6.5(−1) | 0.6(−1) | 2.5(2) | 0.1134 |
Box-Behnken design and observed response value (extraction yield, Y), including actual and predicted code, with different combination of the range of pH value (X1), content of potassium nitrate (X2) and the inoculum volume(X3).
| Run order | Factor value | DNJ content (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Actual value | Predicted value | ||||
| 1 | 6.5(−1) | 0.8(0) | 1.5(−1) | 0.301 | 0.28 |
| 2 | 7.5(1) | 0.8(0) | 1.5(−1) | 0.219 | 0.24 |
| 3 | 7.0(0) | 0.6(−1) | 1.5(−1) | 0.203 | 0.22 |
| 4 | 6.5(−1) | 0.8(0) | 2.5(1) | 0.288 | 0.28 |
| 5 | 7.0(0) | 1.0(1) | 2.5(1) | 0.256 | 0.24 |
| 6 | 7.0(0) | 1.0(1) | 1.5(−1) | 0.212 | 0.20 |
| 7 | 7.0(0) | 0.6(−1) | 2.5(1) | 0.195 | 0.20 |
| 8 | 7.0(0) | 0.8(0) | 2.0(0) | 0.505 | 0.54 |
| 9 | 6.5(−1) | 1.0(1) | 2.0(0) | 0.214 | 0.26 |
| 10 | 6.5(−1) | 0.6(−1) | 2.0(0) | 0.208 | 0.22 |
| 11 | 7.0(0) | 0.8(0) | 2.0(0) | 0.544 | 0.54 |
| 12 | 7.5(1) | 0.8(0) | 2.5(1) | 0.210 | 0.24 |
| 13 | 7.5(1) | 0.6(−1) | 2.0(0) | 0. 243 | 0.22 |
| 14 | 7.5(1) | 1.0(1) | 2.0(0) | 0.189 | 0.18 |
| 15 | 7.0(0) | 0.8(0) | 2.0(0) | 0.595 | 0.54 |
Numbers in parentheses were coded symbols for levels of independent parameters.
Variance analysis of regression model.
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F-value | p-value | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 6.29 × 10−4 | 9 | 6.99 × 10−5 | 12.54 | 0.0062 | |
| Lack of fit | 1.77 × 10−5 | 3 | 5.90 × 10−6 | 1.16 | 0.49 | |
| Pure error | 1.02 × 10−5 | 2 | 5.08 × 10−6 | - | - | - |
| Cor total | 6.57 × 10−4 | 14 | - | - | - | - |
Values of “Prob > F” less than 0.05 indicate model terms are significant.
Variance relatives analysis.
| Std. dev | 2.36 × 10−3 | R-Squared | 0.9576 |
| mean | 0.015 | Adj R-Squared | 0.8813 |
| C.V.% | 16.11 | Pred R-Squared | 0.5342 |
| PRESS | 3.06 × 10−4 | Adeq precision | 9.593 |
Verifying difference significance of coefficients in regression formula.
| Factor | Coefficient estimate | df | Standard error | F-value | p-value | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| intercept | 0.027 | 1 | 1.36 × 10−3 | - | - | - |
| −9.37 × 10−4 | 1 | 8.35 × 10−4 | 1.26 | 0.3124 | - | |
| 1.25 × 10−5 | 1 | 8.35 × 10−4 | 2.24 × 10−4 | 0.9886 | - | |
| 5 × 10−5 | 1 | 8.35 × 10−4 | 3.59 × 10−3 | 0.9546 | - | |
| −9.75 × 10−4 | 1 | 1.18 × 10−3 | 0.68 | 0.4464 | - | |
| 1.50 × 10−4 | 1 | 1.18 × 10−3 | 0.016 | 0.9038 | — | |
| 6.5 × 10−4 | 1 | 1.18 × 10−3 | 0.30 | 0.6056 | — | |
| −7.32 × 10−3 | 1 | 1.23 × 10−3 | 35.50 | 0.0019 | ||
| −9.27 × 10−3 | 1 | 1.23 × 10−3 | 56.94 | 0.0006 | ||
| −7.25 × 10−3 | 1 | 1.23 × 10−3 | 34.78 | 0.0020 |
Values of “Prob > F” less than 0.05 indicates model terms significant.
Figure 3Contour plots (left) and three-dimensional response (right) of the extraction efficiency (DNJ yield, Y) influenced by 3a: the range of pH value (X1) and content of potassium nitrate (X2), 3b: the range of pH value (X1) and the inoculum volume (X3), and 3c: content of potassium nitrate (X2) and the inoculum volume (X3).
Figure 4DNJ production of mulberry leaves fermented by Ganoderma lucidum Value equaled to mean ± standard derivation in 3 duplicates.