| Literature DB >> 25242937 |
Mohd Sajjad Ahmad Khan1, Iqbal Ahmad2, Swaranjit Singh Cameotra3.
Abstract
Emergence of drug-resistant strains has demanded for alternative means of combating fungal infections. Oils of Carum copticum and Thymus vulgaris have long been used in ethnomedicine for ailments of various fungal infections. Since their activity has not been reported in particular against drug-resistant fungi, this study was aimed to evaluate the effects of oils of C. copticum and T. vulgaris on the growth and virulence of drug-resistant strains of Aspergillus spp. and Trichophyton rubrum. The gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis revealed thymol constituting 44.71% and 22.82% of T. vulgaris and C. copticum, respectively. Inhibition of mycelial growth by essential oils was recorded in the order of thymol > T. vulgaris > C. copticum against the tested strains. RBC lysis assay showed no tested oils to be toxic even up to concentration two folds higher than their respective MFCs. Thymol exhibited highest synergy in combination with fluconazole against Aspergillus fumigatus MTCC2550 (FICI value 0.187) and T. rubrum IOA9 (0.156) as determined by checkerboard method. Thymol and T. vulgaris essential oil were equally effective against both the macro and arthroconidia growth (MIC 72 μg/mL). A > 80% reduction in elastase activity was recorded for A. fumigatus MTCC2550 by C. copticum, T. vulgaris oils and thymol. The effectiveness of these oils against arthroconidia and synergistic interaction of thymol and T. vulgaris with fluconazole can be exploited to potentiate the antifungal effects of fluconazole against drug-resistant strains of T. rubrum and Aspergillus spp.Entities:
Keywords: anti-elastase activity; arthroconidia; synergy; thymol; virulence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25242937 PMCID: PMC4166278 DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000200021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Concentration dependent inhibition of dry biomass production in A. fumigatus MTCC2550, A. niger IOA3 and T. rubrum IOA9 by essential oils/active compounds in comparison with fluconazole.
| Conc.(μg/mL) | Percent inhibition in dry biomass over untreated control | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||||||
| Thymol | Conc. (μg/mL) | Fluconazole | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| AF | AN | TR | AF | AN | TR | AF | AN | TR | AF | AN | TR | ||
| 4.5 | 21.34 ± 2.45 | 22.64 ± 1.91 | 19.90 ± 1.86 | 24.51 ± 2.45 | 22.11 ± 1.45 | 17.90 ± 1.27 | 19.56 ± 1.73 | 22.23 ± 3.45 | 19.251.09 | 1.25 | 12.32 ± 1.81 | 11.41 ± 3.24 | 11.41 ± 3.24 |
| 9 | 30.79 ± 2.19 | 32.99 ± 3.34 | 30.5 ± 3.45 | 35.88 ± 2.19 | 33.12 ± 2.64 | 33.55 ± 3.36 | 33.89 ± 1.22 | 30.34 ± 3.18 | 3.251.66 | 2.5 | 21.29 ± 2.56 | 21.26 ± 1.41 | 21.26 ± 1.41 |
| 18 | 41.67 ± 2.34 | 46.37 ± 3.13 | 57.44 ± 4.16 | 47.54 ± 2.08 | 41.23 ± 3.34 | 54.44 ± 4.28 | 44.96 ± 2.72 | 47.23 ± 4.35 | 49.12 ± 4.42 | 5 | 30.90 ± 2.54 | 44.54 ± 2.81 | 44.54 ± 2.81 |
| 36 | 52.56 ± 3.45 | 59.77 ± 2.47 | 66.02 ± 4.78 | 59.37 ± 4.68 | 55.23 ± 3.91 | 69.02 ± 5.50 | 68.02 ± 5.39 | 72.33 ± 6.56 | 64.95 ± 4.04 | 25 | 54.31 ± 6.13 | 53.33 ± 3.41 | 53.33 ± 3.41 |
| 72 | 61.45 ± 1.66 | 64.55 ± 2.69 | 80.27 ± 2.45 | 71.79 ± 2.29 | 70.12 ± 2.39 | 82.27 ± 2.02 | 95.50 ± 6.92 | 94.38 ± 5.23 | 99.753.25 | 50 | 66.62 ± 3.47 | 65.70 ± 1.81 | 65.70 ± 1.81 |
| 144 | 76.34 ± 3.40 | 79.81 ± 4.22 | 100 | 86.02 ± 1.40 | 81.24 ± 4.56 | 100 | - | - | - | 100 | 77.63 ± 1.90 | 77.71 ± 4.16 | 77.71 ± 4.16 |
| 288 | 90.67 ± 3.40 | 93.33 ± 3.30 | - | 98.42 ± 1.40 | 95.34 ± 5.65 | - | - | - | - | 200 | 85.32 ± 0.47 | 84.89 ± 3.19 | 84.89 ± 3.19 |
AF- A. fumigatus MTCC2550; AN- A. niger IOA3; TR- T. rubrum IOA9.
-; indicates no biomass.
Concentration dependent inhibition of mycelial radial growth in A. fumigatus MTCC2550, A. niger IOA3 and T. rubrum IOA9 by essential oils/active compounds in comparison with fluconazole.
| Conc.(μg/mL) | Percent inhibition in radial growth over untreated control | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||||||
| Thymol | Conc. (μg/mL) | Fluconazole | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| AF | AN | TR | AF | AN | TR | AF | AN | TR | AF | AN | TR | ||
| 4.5 | 12.56 ± 1.53 | 19.23 ± 2.03 | 20.45 ± 3.39 | 11.56 ± 1.73 | 14.34 ± 1.45 | 17.251.39 | 20.73 ± 1.15 | 21.44 ± 2.43 | 13.04 ± 1.37 | 1.25 | 10.56 ± 1.81 | 12.34 ± 1.47 | 12.34 ± 2.69 |
| 9 | 21.89 ± 1.42 | 28.67 ± 3.13 | 35.45 ± 2.66 | 25.89 ± 1.42 | 22.38 ± 2.34 | 30.251.66 | 30.70 ± 2.57 | 32.34 ± 3.23 | 23.89 ± 1.34 | 2.5 | 17.251.27 | 19.35 ± 1.81 | 19.92 ± 3.41 |
| 18 | 30.46 ± 2.12 | 40.13 ± 3.91 | 50.12 ± 6.32 | 40.46 ± 2.12 | 39.23 ± 2.45 | 45.12 ± 4.22 | 41.79 ± 2.20 | 42.23 ± 320 | 37.70 ± 2.33 | 5 | 23.04 ± 2.86 | 25.23 ± 2.86 | 29.03 ± 4.93 |
| 36 | 59.32 ± 5.49 | 55.34 ± 5.23 | 79.15 ± 5.23 | 59.02 ± 5.39 | 55.35 ± 4.45 | 68.15 ± 4.23 | 59.42 ± 4.38 | 68.34 ± 5.35 | 63.70 ± 4.10 | 25 | 36.39 ± 2.92 | 35.44 ± 3.24 | 53.384.58 |
| 72 | 67.27 ± 3.10 | 69.33 ± 5.39 | 98.46 ± 5.13 | 73.27 ± 3.10 | 71.89 ± 3.91 | 95.13 ± 3.15 | 97.26 ± 2.94 | 96.34 ± 6.56 | 94.07 ± 3.64 | 50 | 66.47 ± 4.53 | 67.44 ± 5.45 | 61.87 ± 6.18 |
| 144 | 96.70 ± 4.42 | 95.33 ± 5.13 | - | 98.20 ± 6.32 | 95.34 ± 5.34 | - | - | - | - | 100 | 71.04 ± 3.57 | 75.45 ± 4.67 | 70.67 ± 5.60 |
| 288 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 200 | 87.08 ± 2.98 | 89.49 ± 5.36 | 86.00 ± 4.64 |
AF- A. fumigatus MTCC2550; AN- A. niger IOA3; TR- T. rubrum IOA9.
-; indicates no biomass.
Haemolytic properties of C. copticum, T. vulgaris oils and thymol.
| Test agents | Percent haemolysis of RBC (Mean ± SD) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Concentration of essential oils/active compounds (μg/mL) | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| 18 | 36 | 72 | 144 | 288 | 576 | 2304 | |
| Essential oils | |||||||
| 1.48 ± 0.14 | 1.84 ± 0.14 | 2.44 ± 0.19 | 3.51 ± 0.07 | 4.27 ± 0.17 | 4.62 ± 0.27 | 21.03 ± 0.30 | |
| 1.38 ± 0.14 | 1.84 ± 0.14 | 2.74 ± 0.19 | 3.21 ± 0.07 | 4.09 ± 0.17 | 4.92 ± 0.27 | 19.11 ± 0.40 | |
| Active compounds | |||||||
| Thymol | 1.64 ± 0.19 | 2.59 ± 0.07 | 3.45 ± 0.12 | 3.99 ± 0.05 | 4.68 ± 0.17 | 5.66 ± 0.20 | 16.34 ± 0.23 |
FIC and FICI for combination of essential oils or active compounds with fluconazole against A. fumigatus MTCC2550 and T. rubrum IOA9.
| Test combinations | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| MICa | MICc | FICI | T | MICa | MICc | FICI | T | |
| 144 | 9 | 0.562 | I | 72 | 18 | 0.75 | I | |
| Fluconazole (μg/mL) | 200 | 100 | 200 | 100 | ||||
| 144 | 18 | 0.250 | S | 72 | 9 | 0.250 | S | |
| Fluconazole (μg/mL) | 200 | 25 | 200 | 25 | ||||
| Thymol with fluconazole | ||||||||
| Thymol (μg/mL) | 192 | 12 | 0.187 | S | 192 | 6 | 0.156 | S |
| Fluconazole (μg/mL) | 200 | 25 | 200 | 25 | ||||
MICa, MIC of one agent alone; MICc, MIC of agent in most effective combination; I- indifferent; S- synergy.
Effect of essential oils and active compounds in terms of MIC against arthroconidia compared to macroconidia in T. rubrum IOA9.
| Test agents | MIC (μg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Macroconidia | Arthroconidia | |
| Essential oils | ||
| 72 | 144 | |
| 72 | 72 | |
| Active compounds | ||
| Thymol | 72 | 72 |
| Antifungal drugs | ||
| Fluconazole | 200 | 1600 |
Effect of essential oils and active compounds on elastase and keratinase activities in A. niger IOA3 and T. rubrum IOA9, respectively.
| Test agents | Percent reduction in absorbance at 495 nm over untreated control for elastase activity | Percent reduction in absorbance at 280 nm over untreated control for keratinase activity |
|---|---|---|
| Essential oils | ||
| 81.24 ± 3.89 | 24.33 ± 1.24 | |
| 90.75 ± 3.45 | 15.96 ± 1.23 | |
| Active compounds | ||
| Thymol | 95.56 ± 4.09 | 13.90 ± 1.22 |
| Inhibitors | ||
| EDTA | 72.63 ± 1.26 | 54.48 ± 2.20 |
| MgSO4 | 94.10 ± 1.63 | 39.77 ± 1.06 |