Literature DB >> 25242853

Classification and Weakly Supervised Pain Localization using Multiple Segment Representation.

Karan Sikka1, Abhinav Dhall2, Marian Stewart Bartlett1.   

Abstract

Automatic pain recognition from videos is a vital clinical application and, owing to its spontaneous nature, poses interesting challenges to automatic facial expression recognition (AFER) research. Previous pain vs no-pain systems have highlighted two major challenges: (1) ground truth is provided for the sequence, but the presence or absence of the target expression for a given frame is unknown, and (2) the time point and the duration of the pain expression event(s) in each video are unknown. To address these issues we propose a novel framework (referred to as MS-MIL) where each sequence is represented as a bag containing multiple segments, and multiple instance learning (MIL) is employed to handle this weakly labeled data in the form of sequence level ground-truth. These segments are generated via multiple clustering of a sequence or running a multi-scale temporal scanning window, and are represented using a state-of-the-art Bag of Words (BoW) representation. This work extends the idea of detecting facial expressions through 'concept frames' to 'concept segments' and argues through extensive experiments that algorithms such as MIL are needed to reap the benefits of such representation. The key advantages of our approach are: (1) joint detection and localization of painful frames using only sequence-level ground-truth, (2) incorporation of temporal dynamics by representing the data not as individual frames but as segments, and (3) extraction of multiple segments, which is well suited to signals with uncertain temporal location and duration in the video. Extensive experiments on UNBC-McMaster Shoulder Pain dataset highlight the effectiveness of the approach by achieving competitive results on both tasks of pain classification and localization in videos. We also empirically evaluate the contributions of different components of MS-MIL. The paper also includes the visualization of discriminative facial patches, important for pain detection, as discovered by our algorithm and relates them to Action Units that have been associated with pain expression. We conclude the paper by demonstrating that MS-MIL yields a significant improvement on another spontaneous facial expression dataset, the FEEDTUM dataset.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action classification; Bag of Words; Bagging; Boosting; Emotion classification; Pain; Temporal Segmentation; Weakly Supervised Learning

Year:  2014        PMID: 25242853      PMCID: PMC4167371          DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2014.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Image Vis Comput        ISSN: 0262-8856            Impact factor:   2.818


  6 in total

1.  Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models.

Authors:  Pedro F Felzenszwalb; Ross B Girshick; David McAllester; Deva Ramanan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.226

2.  Genuine, suppressed and faked facial behavior during exacerbation of chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Kenneth D Craig; Susan A Hyde; Christopher J Patrick
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  The Painful Face - Pain Expression Recognition Using Active Appearance Models.

Authors:  Ahmed Bilal Ashraf; Simon Lucey; Jeffrey F Cohn; Tsuhan Chen; Zara Ambadar; Kenneth M Prkachin; Patricia E Solomon
Journal:  Image Vis Comput       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.818

4.  The structure, reliability and validity of pain expression: evidence from patients with shoulder pain.

Authors:  Kenneth M Prkachin; Patricia E Solomon
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Improving Pain Recognition Through Better Utilisation of Temporal Information.

Authors:  Patrick Lucey; Jessica Howlett; Jeff Cohn; Simon Lucey; Sridha Sridharan; Zara Ambadar
Journal:  Int Conf Audit Vis Speech Process       Date:  2008

Review 6.  What should be the core outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials?

Authors:  Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 5.156

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Learning Pain from Action Unit Combinations: A Weakly Supervised Approach via Multiple Instance Learning.

Authors:  Zhanli Chen; Rashid Ansari; Diana J Wilkie
Journal:  IEEE Trans Affect Comput       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 10.506

Review 2.  Assessing Pain Research: A Narrative Review of Emerging Pain Methods, Their Technosocial Implications, and Opportunities for Multidisciplinary Approaches.

Authors:  Sara E Berger; Alexis T Baria
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-02

3.  The Automatic Detection of Chronic Pain-Related Expression: Requirements, Challenges and the Multimodal EmoPain Dataset.

Authors:  Min S H Aung; Sebastian Kaltwang; Bernardino Romera-Paredes; Brais Martinez; Aneesha Singh; Matteo Cella; Michel Valstar; Hongying Meng; Andrew Kemp; Moshen Shafizadeh; Aaron C Elkins; Natalie Kanakam; Amschel de Rothschild; Nick Tyler; Paul J Watson; Amanda C de C Williams; Maja Pantic; Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Affect Comput       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 10.506

Review 4.  Sensor Technologies to Manage the Physiological Traits of Chronic Pain: A Review.

Authors:  David Naranjo-Hernández; Javier Reina-Tosina; Laura M Roa
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Computer mediated automatic detection of pain-related behavior: prospect, progress, perils.

Authors:  Kenneth M Prkachin; Zakia Hammal
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.