Lorenza Landi1, Marcello Tiseo2, Rita Chiari3, Serena Ricciardi4, Elisa Rossi5, Domenico Galetta6, Silvia Novello7, Michele Milella8, Armida D'Incecco1, Gabriele Minuti1, Carmelo Tibaldi1, Jessica Salvini1, Francesco Facchinetti2, Eva Regina Haspinger9, Diego Cortinovis10, Antonio Santo11, Giuseppe Banna12, Annamaria Catino6, Matteo GiajLevra7, Lucio Crinò3, Filippo de Marinis13, Federico Cappuzzo14. 1. Department of MedicalOncology, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Livorno, Italy. 2. Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy. 3. Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy. 4. High Specialization Hospitals, Oncological Pulmonary First Unit, Rome, Italy. 5. Fondazione Ricerca Traslazionale, FoRT, Rome, Italy. 6. Division Of Medical Oncology, Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", IRCCS, Bari, Italy. 7. Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, San Luigi Gonzaga, Turin, Italy. 8. Division of Medical Oncology A, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy. 9. Division of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. 10. Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy. 11. Division of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrate, Verona, Italy. 12. Medical Oncology Service, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy. 13. Division of Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milano, Italy. 14. Department of MedicalOncology, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Livorno, Italy. Electronic address: f.cappuzzo@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of afatinib in EGFR-mutant metastatic NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC treated with afatinib after failure of chemotherapy and EGFR TKIs. RESULTS: A total of 96 individuals were included in the study. According to EGFR status, most patients (n = 63; 65.6%) harbored a deletion in exon 19, and de novo T790M mutation was detected in 2 cases (T790M and exon 19). Twenty-four (25%) patients underwent repeated biopsy immediately before starting afatinib and secondary T790M was detected in 8 (33%) samples. Among the 86 patients evaluable for efficacy, response rate was 11.6%, with a median progression free-survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 3.9 and 7.3 months, respectively. No significant difference in PFS and OS was observed according to type of last therapy received before afatinib, type of EGFR mutation or adherence to Jackman criteria, and patients benefiting from afatinib therapy had longer PFS and OS (P < .001). Outcome results for repeated biopsy patients were similar to the whole population, with no evidence of response in T790M-positive patients. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 81% experienced an AE of any grade, with grade 3 to 4 AEs, mainly diarrhea and skin toxicity, occurring in 19 (20%) patients. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that afatinib has only modest efficacy in a real life population of EGFR mutant NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of afatinib in EGFR-mutant metastatic NSCLCpatients with acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC treated with afatinib after failure of chemotherapy and EGFR TKIs. RESULTS: A total of 96 individuals were included in the study. According to EGFR status, most patients (n = 63; 65.6%) harbored a deletion in exon 19, and de novo T790M mutation was detected in 2 cases (T790M and exon 19). Twenty-four (25%) patients underwent repeated biopsy immediately before starting afatinib and secondary T790M was detected in 8 (33%) samples. Among the 86 patients evaluable for efficacy, response rate was 11.6%, with a median progression free-survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 3.9 and 7.3 months, respectively. No significant difference in PFS and OS was observed according to type of last therapy received before afatinib, type of EGFR mutation or adherence to Jackman criteria, and patients benefiting from afatinib therapy had longer PFS and OS (P < .001). Outcome results for repeated biopsy patients were similar to the whole population, with no evidence of response in T790M-positive patients. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 81% experienced an AE of any grade, with grade 3 to 4 AEs, mainly diarrhea and skin toxicity, occurring in 19 (20%) patients. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that afatinib has only modest efficacy in a real life population of EGFR mutant NSCLCpatients with acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib.
Authors: Antonio Passaro; Filippo de Marinis; Hai-Yan Tu; Konstantin K Laktionov; Jifeng Feng; Artem Poltoratskiy; Jun Zhao; Eng Huat Tan; Maya Gottfried; Victor Lee; Dariusz Kowalski; Cheng Ta Yang; B J Srinivasa; Laura Clementi; Tejaswini Jalikop; Dennis Chin Lun Huang; Agnieszka Cseh; Keunchil Park; Yi-Long Wu Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 6.244