C Joseph1, D Morrissey2, M Abdur-Rahman3, A Hussenbux3, C Barton4. 1. Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Bart's and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, London, UK; Clinical Research Centre for Movement Disorders and Gait, Southern Health Centre, Victoria, Australia. 2. Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Bart's and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, London, UK; Physiotherapy Department, Bart's Health NHS trust, London, UK. Electronic address: d.morrissey@qmul.ac.uk. 3. Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Bart's and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, London, UK. 4. Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Bart's and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, London, UK; Complete Sports Care, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Musculoskeletal Research Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia; Pure Sports Medicine, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Triage is implemented in healthcare settings to optimise access to appropriate care and manage waiting times. OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimum features of triage systems for patients with musculoskeletal conditions. DATA SOURCES: AMED, BNI, CINAHL, EMBASE, Health Business Elite, HMIC, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Google Scholar. STUDY SELECTION OR ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies that included non-musculoskeletal conditions, concerned patients aged <18 years or were set in emergency departments were excluded. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Study quality was graded using the Downs and Black quality index. Qualitative methods were used to further inform the findings of the literature review. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, with study quality ranging from eight to 24 out of a possible 27. Musculoskeletal triage is conducted via face-to-face consultation, paper referral letter or telephone consultation. Triage performed by physiotherapists, general practitioners, multidisciplinary teams, nurses, occupational therapists and speech therapists has been shown to be effective using a range of outcomes. Qualitative data revealed the value of supportive interdisciplinary teams, and suggested that this support is more important than choice of clinician. Patients trusted, and expressed preferences for, experienced clinicians to perform triage. CONCLUSION: Triage can be performed effectively via a number of methods and by a range of clinicians. Satisfaction, cost, diagnostic agreement, appropriateness of referral and waiting list time have been improved though triage. Multidisciplinary support mechanisms are critical elements of successful triage systems. Patients are more concerned with access issues than professional boundaries.
BACKGROUND: Triage is implemented in healthcare settings to optimise access to appropriate care and manage waiting times. OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimum features of triage systems for patients with musculoskeletal conditions. DATA SOURCES: AMED, BNI, CINAHL, EMBASE, Health Business Elite, HMIC, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Google Scholar. STUDY SELECTION OR ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies that included non-musculoskeletal conditions, concerned patients aged <18 years or were set in emergency departments were excluded. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Study quality was graded using the Downs and Black quality index. Qualitative methods were used to further inform the findings of the literature review. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, with study quality ranging from eight to 24 out of a possible 27. Musculoskeletal triage is conducted via face-to-face consultation, paper referral letter or telephone consultation. Triage performed by physiotherapists, general practitioners, multidisciplinary teams, nurses, occupational therapists and speech therapists has been shown to be effective using a range of outcomes. Qualitative data revealed the value of supportive interdisciplinary teams, and suggested that this support is more important than choice of clinician. Patients trusted, and expressed preferences for, experienced clinicians to perform triage. CONCLUSION: Triage can be performed effectively via a number of methods and by a range of clinicians. Satisfaction, cost, diagnostic agreement, appropriateness of referral and waiting list time have been improved though triage. Multidisciplinary support mechanisms are critical elements of successful triage systems. Patients are more concerned with access issues than professional boundaries.
Authors: Nicola Smith; Victoria Mercer; Jill Firth; Sharmila Jandial; Katharine Kinsey; Helen Light; Alan Nye; Tim Rapley; Helen E Foster Journal: Rheumatol Adv Pract Date: 2020-10-16
Authors: Darryn Marks; Leanne Bisset; Tracy Comans; Michael Thomas; Shu Kay Ng; Shaun O'Leary; Philip G Conaghan; Paul A Scuffham Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marie O Mir; Ciara Cooney; Cliona O'Sullivan; Catherine Blake; Paula Kelly; Pat Kiely; Jacques Noel; David Moore Journal: J Child Orthop Date: 2016-04-02 Impact factor: 1.548
Authors: Laura M Fullerton; Sydney Brooks; Raquel Sweezie; Vandana Ahluwalia; Claire Bombardier; Anna R Gagliardi Journal: Pragmat Obs Res Date: 2020-01-28