RATIONALE: Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) has a history of use as a psychotherapeutic aid in the treatment of mood disorders and addiction, and it was also explored as an enhancer of mind control. OBJECTIVES: The present study sought to test the effect of LSD on suggestibility in a modern research study. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers were administered with intravenous (i.v.) LSD (40-80 μg) in a within-subject placebo-controlled design. Suggestibility and cued mental imagery were assessed using the Creative Imagination Scale (CIS) and a mental imagery test (MIT). CIS and MIT items were split into two versions (A and B), balanced for 'efficacy' (i.e. A ≈ B) and counterbalanced across conditions (i.e. 50 % completed version 'A' under LSD). The MIT and CIS were issued 110 and 140 min, respectively, post-infusion, corresponding with the peak drug effects. RESULTS: Volunteers gave significantly higher ratings for the CIS (p = 0.018), but not the MIT (p = 0.11), after LSD than placebo. The magnitude of suggestibility enhancement under LSD was positively correlated with trait conscientiousness measured at baseline (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: These results imply that the influence of suggestion is enhanced by LSD. Enhanced suggestibility under LSD may have implications for its use as an adjunct to psychotherapy, where suggestibility plays a major role. That cued imagery was unaffected by LSD implies that suggestions must be of a sufficient duration and level of detail to be enhanced by the drug. The results also imply that individuals with high trait conscientiousness are especially sensitive to the suggestibility-enhancing effects of LSD.
RATIONALE: Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) has a history of use as a psychotherapeutic aid in the treatment of mood disorders and addiction, and it was also explored as an enhancer of mind control. OBJECTIVES: The present study sought to test the effect of LSD on suggestibility in a modern research study. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers were administered with intravenous (i.v.) LSD (40-80 μg) in a within-subject placebo-controlled design. Suggestibility and cued mental imagery were assessed using the Creative Imagination Scale (CIS) and a mental imagery test (MIT). CIS and MIT items were split into two versions (A and B), balanced for 'efficacy' (i.e. A ≈ B) and counterbalanced across conditions (i.e. 50 % completed version 'A' under LSD). The MIT and CIS were issued 110 and 140 min, respectively, post-infusion, corresponding with the peak drug effects. RESULTS: Volunteers gave significantly higher ratings for the CIS (p = 0.018), but not the MIT (p = 0.11), after LSD than placebo. The magnitude of suggestibility enhancement under LSD was positively correlated with trait conscientiousness measured at baseline (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: These results imply that the influence of suggestion is enhanced by LSD. Enhanced suggestibility under LSD may have implications for its use as an adjunct to psychotherapy, where suggestibility plays a major role. That cued imagery was unaffected by LSD implies that suggestions must be of a sufficient duration and level of detail to be enhanced by the drug. The results also imply that individuals with high trait conscientiousness are especially sensitive to the suggestibility-enhancing effects of LSD.
Authors: F X Vollenweider; K L Leenders; C Scharfetter; P Maguire; O Stadelmann; J Angst Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: M Kaelen; F S Barrett; L Roseman; R Lorenz; N Family; M Bolstridge; H V Curran; A Feilding; D J Nutt; R L Carhart-Harris Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2015-08-11 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Rafael G Dos Santos; Flávia L Osório; José Alexandre S Crippa; Jordi Riba; Antônio W Zuardi; Jaime E C Hallak Journal: Ther Adv Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-03-18
Authors: Alexander V Lebedev; Martin Lövdén; Gidon Rosenthal; Amanda Feilding; David J Nutt; Robin L Carhart-Harris Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Bethany L Stangl; Randi M Schuster; Alyssa Schneider; Alyson Dechert; Kevin W Potter; Maya Hareli; Fahim Mahmud; Elgin R Yalin; Vijay A Ramchandani; Jodi M Gilman Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 4.153