Literature DB >> 25242203

Contributions to muscle force and EMG by combined neural excitation and electrical stimulation.

Patrick E Crago1, Nathaniel S Makowski, Natalie M Cole.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Stimulation of muscle for research or clinical interventions is often superimposed on ongoing physiological activity without a quantitative understanding of the impact of the stimulation on the net muscle activity and the physiological response. Experimental studies show that total force during stimulation is less than the sum of the isolated voluntary and stimulated forces, but the occlusion mechanism is not understood. APPROACH: We develop a model of efferent motor activity elicited by superimposing stimulation during a physiologically activated contraction. The model combines action potential interactions due to collision block, source resetting, and refractory periods with previously published models of physiological motor unit recruitment, rate modulation, force production, and EMG generation in human first dorsal interosseous muscle to investigate the mechanisms and effectiveness of stimulation on the net muscle force and EMG. MAIN
RESULTS: Stimulation during a physiological contraction demonstrates partial occlusion of force and the neural component of the EMG, due to action potential interactions in motor units activated by both sources. Depending on neural and stimulation firing rates as well as on force-frequency properties, individual motor unit forces can be greater, smaller, or unchanged by the stimulation. In contrast, voluntary motor unit EMG potentials in simultaneously stimulated motor units show progressive occlusion with increasing stimulus rate. The simulations predict that occlusion would be decreased by a reverse stimulation recruitment order. SIGNIFICANCE: The results are consistent with and provide a mechanistic interpretation of previously published experimental evidence of force occlusion. The models also predict two effects that have not been reported previously--voluntary EMG occlusion and the advantages of a proximal stimulation site. This study provides a basis for the rational design of both future experiments and clinical neuroprosthetic interventions involving either motor or sensory stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25242203      PMCID: PMC4238908          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/5/056022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  34 in total

1.  Twitch interpolation in human muscles: mechanisms and implications for measurement of voluntary activation.

Authors:  R D Herbert; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The physiological functional loss of single thenar motor units in the stroke patients: when does it occur? Does it progress?

Authors:  Yukihiro Hara; Yoshihisa Masakado; Naoichi Chino
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  MUAP number estimates in surface EMG: template-matching methods and their performance boundaries.

Authors:  Ping Zhou; William Z Rymer
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Inference of motor unit recruitment order in voluntary and electrically elicited contractions.

Authors:  M Knaflitz; R Merletti; C J De Luca
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1990-04

5.  Alteration of neural action potential patterns by axonal stimulation: the importance of stimulus location.

Authors:  Patrick E Crago; Nathaniel S Makowski
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Axonal conduction velocity and force of single human motor units.

Authors:  R Dengler; R B Stein; C K Thomas
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Characteristics of motor unit discharge in subjects with hemiparesis.

Authors:  J J Gemperline; S Allen; D Walk; W Z Rymer
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  Models of recruitment and rate coding organization in motor-unit pools.

Authors:  A J Fuglevand; D A Winter; A E Patla
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Refractory period of single motor nerve fibres in man.

Authors:  J Borg
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Intramuscular hand neuroprosthesis for chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  John Chae; Ronald Hart
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.919

View more
  4 in total

1.  Is the notion of central fatigue based on a solid foundation?

Authors:  Paola Contessa; Alessio Puleo; Carlo J De Luca
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Upper-Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing EMG-Triggered, Cyclic, and Sensory Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Richard D Wilson; Stephen J Page; Michael Delahanty; Jayme S Knutson; Douglas D Gunzler; Lynne R Sheffler; John Chae
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Stochastically modulated inter-pulse intervals to increase the efficiency of functional electrical stimulation cycling.

Authors:  E A Aksöz; M A Luder; M Laubacher; R Riener; S A Binder-Macleod; K J Hunt
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2018-04-11

4.  Adaptation Strategies for Personalized Gait Neuroprosthetics.

Authors:  Anne D Koelewijn; Musa Audu; Antonio J Del-Ama; Annalisa Colucci; Josep M Font-Llagunes; Antonio Gogeascoechea; Sandra K Hnat; Nathan Makowski; Juan C Moreno; Mark Nandor; Roger Quinn; Marc Reichenbach; Ryan-David Reyes; Massimo Sartori; Surjo Soekadar; Ronald J Triolo; Mareike Vermehren; Christian Wenger; Utku S Yavuz; Dietmar Fey; Philipp Beckerle
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.650

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.