Literature DB >> 25242111

Analysis of using EMG and mechanical sensors to enhance intent recognition in powered lower limb prostheses.

A J Young1, T A Kuiken, L J Hargrove.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the contribution of electromyography (EMG) data, in combination with a diverse array of mechanical sensors, to locomotion mode intent recognition in transfemoral amputees using powered prostheses. Additionally, we determined the effect of adding time history information using a dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) for both the mechanical and EMG sensors. APPROACH: EMG signals from the residual limbs of amputees have been proposed to enhance pattern recognition-based intent recognition systems for powered lower limb prostheses, but mechanical sensors on the prosthesis-such as inertial measurement units, position and velocity sensors, and load cells-may be just as useful. EMG and mechanical sensor data were collected from 8 transfemoral amputees using a powered knee/ankle prosthesis over basic locomotion modes such as walking, slopes and stairs. An offline study was conducted to determine the benefit of different sensor sets for predicting intent. MAIN
RESULTS: EMG information was not as accurate alone as mechanical sensor information (p < 0.05) for any classification strategy. However, EMG in combination with the mechanical sensor data did significantly reduce intent recognition errors (p < 0.05) both for transitions between locomotion modes and steady-state locomotion. The sensor time history (DBN) classifier significantly reduced error rates compared to a linear discriminant classifier for steady-state steps, without increasing the transitional error, for both EMG and mechanical sensors. Combining EMG and mechanical sensor data with sensor time history reduced the average transitional error from 18.4% to 12.2% and the average steady-state error from 3.8% to 1.0% when classifying level-ground walking, ramps, and stairs in eight transfemoral amputee subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that a neural interface in combination with time history methods for locomotion mode classification can enhance intent recognition performance; this strategy should be considered for future real-time experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25242111     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/5/056021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  28 in total

1.  Modeling the Kinematics of Human Locomotion Over Continuously Varying Speeds and Inclines.

Authors:  Kyle R Embry; Dario J Villarreal; Rebecca L Macaluso; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  A decade retrospective of medical robotics research from 2010 to 2020.

Authors:  Pierre E Dupont; Bradley J Nelson; Michael Goldfarb; Blake Hannaford; Arianna Menciassi; Marcia K O'Malley; Nabil Simaan; Pietro Valdastri; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2021-11-10

3.  Magnetomicrometry.

Authors:  C R Taylor; S S Srinivasan; S H Yeon; M K O'Donnell; T J Roberts; H M Herr
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2021-08-18

4.  Acquisition of Surface EMG Using Flexible and Low-Profile Electrodes for Lower Extremity Neuroprosthetic Control.

Authors:  Seong Ho Yeon; Tony Shu; Hyungeun Song; Tsung-Han Hsieh; Junqing Qiao; Emily A Rogers; Samantha Gutierrez-Arango; Erica Israel; Lisa E Freed; Hugh M Herr
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics       Date:  2021-07-21

5.  Continuous Classification of Locomotion in Response to Task Complexity and Anticipatory State.

Authors:  Mahdieh Kazemimoghadam; Nicholas P Fey
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-04-22

6.  Locomotor activities of individuals with lower-limb amputation.

Authors:  Bantoon Srisuwan; Glenn K Klute
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.672

Review 7.  EMG-driven control in lower limb prostheses: a topic-based systematic review.

Authors:  Andrea Cimolato; Josephus J M Driessen; Leonardo S Mattos; Elena De Momi; Matteo Laffranchi; Lorenzo De Michieli
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 5.208

8.  PSO-SVM-Based Online Locomotion Mode Identification for Rehabilitation Robotic Exoskeletons.

Authors:  Yi Long; Zhi-Jiang Du; Wei-Dong Wang; Guang-Yu Zhao; Guo-Qiang Xu; Long He; Xi-Wang Mao; Wei Dong
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Detection of Gait Modes Using an Artificial Neural Network during Walking with a Powered Ankle-Foot Orthosis.

Authors:  Mazharul Islam; Elizabeth T Hsiao-Wecksler
Journal:  J Biophys       Date:  2016-12-13

10.  Low-back electromyography (EMG) data-driven load classification for dynamic lifting tasks.

Authors:  Deema Totah; Lauro Ojeda; Daniel D Johnson; Deanna Gates; Emily Mower Provost; Kira Barton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.