Literature DB >> 25241218

Analysis of meaningful conditioned pain modulation effect in a pain-free adult population.

David Locke1, William Gibson2, Penny Moss1, Kylie Munyard3, Cyril Mamotte3, Anthony Wright4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) encompasses the effects of inhibitory and facilitatory pain modulatory systems and is inefficient in some chronic pain states. A proportion of healthy subjects also exhibit little or no CPM, perhaps suggesting that inherent factors such as gender or genetics may be influential. However, there is no consensus on how best to determine a meaningful CPM effect. This study aimed to determine the proportion of pain-free subjects exhibiting a meaningful CPM effect. Analyses of associations between 5HTTLPR (serotonin transporter-linked polymorphic region) polymorphisms on the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4), gender, and CPM effect were also carried out. A total of 125 healthy subjects (47 male; 78 female) underwent pressure pain threshold testing before, during, and after a cold pressor conditioning stimulus. A buccal cell sample was collected for analysis of 5HTTLPR genotype. Meaningful CPM effect was determined as an increase in pressure pain threshold values from baseline greater than the inherent error of measurement, calculated as 5.3%. During the conditioning stimulus, 116 subjects (92.8%) exhibited a CPM effect whereas 9 did not. CPM effect did not differ significantly between genders or between 5HTTLPR genotypes. This provides a clear basis on which to determine the proportion of patients with a chronic pain disorder that exhibit a meaningful CPM effect. PERSPECTIVE: This study proposes a method for calculating meaningful CPM effect and reports the proportion and magnitude of effect elicited in a large sample. Associations between CPM, gender, and genotype were also analyzed. Clarification of normal CPM response may help to elucidate the mechanisms driving CPM inefficiency in chronic pain. Crown
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conditioned pain modulation; diffuse noxious inhibitory controls; gender; healthy adults; serotonin transporter gene

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25241218     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  13 in total

1.  Race Effects on Conditioned Pain Modulation in Youth.

Authors:  Matthew C Morris; Lynn Walker; Stephen Bruehl; Natalie Hellman; Amanda L Sherman; Uma Rao
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 2.  Pain Modulation: From Conditioned Pain Modulation to Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Experimental and Clinical Pain.

Authors:  Janie Damien; Luana Colloca; Carmen-Édith Bellei-Rodriguez; Serge Marchand
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.230

3.  EVALUATING THE PROGRESS OF MID-PORTION ACHILLES TENDINOPATHY DURING REHABILITATION: A REVIEW OF OUTCOME MEASURES FOR MUSCLE STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION, TENDON STRUCTURE, AND NEURAL AND PAIN ASSOCIATED MECHANISMS.

Authors:  Myles Murphy; Ebonie Rio; James Debenham; Sean Docking; Mervyn Travers; William Gibson
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-06

4.  Considerations for multi-centre conditioned pain modulation (CPM) research; an investigation of the inter-rater reliability, level of agreement and confounders for the Achilles tendon and Triceps Surae.

Authors:  Myles Murphy; William Gibson; Paola Chivers; Sean Docking; Ebonie Rio
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2020-04-17

5.  Sex differences in experimental measures of pain sensitivity and endogenous pain inhibition.

Authors:  Hailey W Bulls; Emily L Freeman; Austen Jb Anderson; Meredith T Robbins; Timothy J Ness; Burel R Goodin
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  A novel paradigm to evaluate conditioned pain modulation in fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Cynthia J Schoen; Jacob N Ablin; Eric Ichesco; Rupal J Bhavsar; Laura Kochlefl; Richard E Harris; Daniel J Clauw; Richard H Gracely; Steven E Harte
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Conditioned pain modulation identifies altered sensitivity in extremely preterm young adult males and females.

Authors:  S M Walker; H O'Reilly; J Beckmann; N Marlow
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  The Association Between Conditioned Pain Modulation and Manipulation-induced Analgesia in People With Lateral Epicondylalgia.

Authors:  Ahmad Muhsen; Penny Moss; William Gibson; Bruce Walker; Angela Jacques; Stephan Schug; Anthony Wright
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  Evoked potentials after painful cutaneous electrical stimulation depict pain relief during a conditioned pain modulation.

Authors:  Oliver Höffken; Özüm S Özgül; Elena K Enax-Krumova; Martin Tegenthoff; Christoph Maier
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 10.  Reliability of conditioned pain modulation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Donna L Kennedy; Harriet I Kemp; Deborah Ridout; David Yarnitsky; Andrew S C Rice
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.