Literature DB >> 25241163

Application of quantitative microbial risk assessment for selection of microbial reduction targets for hard surface disinfectants.

Michael O Ryan1, Charles N Haas2, Patrick L Gurian2, Charles P Gerba3, Brian M Panzl4, Joan B Rose4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) included problem formulation for fomites and hazard identification for 7 microorganisms, including pathogenic Escherichia coli and E coli 0157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, norovirus, Pseudomonas spp, Salmonella spp, and Staphylococcus aureus. The goal was to address a risk-based process for choosing the log10 reduction recommendations, in contrast to the current US Environmental Protection Agency requirements.
METHOD: For each microbe evaluated, the QMRA model included specific dose-response models, occurrence determination of aerobic bacteria and specific organisms on fomites, exposure assessment, risk characterization, and risk reduction. Risk estimates were determined for a simple scenario using a single touch of a contaminated surface and self-inoculation. A comparative analysis of log10 reductions, as suggested by the US Environmental Protection Agency, and the risks based on this QMRA approach was also undertaken.
RESULTS: The literature review and meta-analysis showed that aerobic bacteria were the most commonly studied on fomites, averaging 100 colony-forming units (CFU)/cm(2). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was found at a level of 3.3 × 10(-1) CFU/cm(2); methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA), at 6.4 × 10(-1) CFU/cm(2). Risk estimates per contact event ranged from a high of 10(-3) for norovirus to a low of 10(-9) for S aureus.
CONCLUSION: This QMRA analysis suggests that a reduction in bacterial numbers on a fomite by 99% (2 logs) most often will reduce the risk of infection from a single contact to less than 1 in 1 million.
Copyright © 2014 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose-response; Fomite; Microbial surface contamination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25241163     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  29 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment and Infectious Disease Transmission Modeling of Waterborne Enteric Pathogens.

Authors:  Andrew F Brouwer; Nina B Masters; Joseph N S Eisenberg
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2018-06

2.  Quantitative microbial risk assessment of human norovirus infection in environmental service workers due to healthcare-associated fomites.

Authors:  K N Overbey; G B Hamra; K E Nachman; C Rock; K J Schwab
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 3.  Viral Eco-Genomic Tools: Development and Implementation for Aquatic Biomonitoring.

Authors:  Gomaa Mostafa-Hedeab; Abdou Kamal Allayeh; Hany Abdelfattah Elhady; Abozer Y Eledrdery; Mobarak Abu Mraheil; Ahmed Mostafa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Quantifying pathogen infection risks from household laundry practices.

Authors:  Kelly A Reynolds; Marc P Verhougstraete; Kristina D Mena; Syed A Sattar; Elizabeth A Scott; Charles P Gerba
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 4.059

5.  Assessment of rotavirus and norovirus emitted from water spray park: QMRA, diseases burden and sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  Hasan Pasalari; Hesam Akbari; Angila Ataei-Pirkooh; Amir Adibzadeh; Hamed Akbari
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-10-07

6.  Face masks effectively limit the probability of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

Authors:  Yafang Cheng; Nan Ma; Christian Witt; Steffen Rapp; Philipp S Wild; Meinrat O Andreae; Ulrich Pöschl; Hang Su
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 63.714

7.  Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment of Antimicrobial Resistant and Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in Reclaimed Wastewaters.

Authors:  Mary E Schoen; Michael A Jahne; Jay Garland; Lucia Ramirez; Allison J Lopatkin; Kerry A Hamilton
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Recovery of Infectious Human Norovirus GII.4 Sydney From Fomites via Replication in Human Intestinal Enteroids.

Authors:  Katie N Overbey; Nicholas C Zachos; Caroline Coulter; Joseph Jacangelo; Kellogg J Schwab
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.293

9.  Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment in Occupational Settings Applied to the Airborne Human Adenovirus Infection.

Authors:  Annalaura Carducci; Gabriele Donzelli; Lorenzo Cioni; Marco Verani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  A unified framework for developing effective hygiene procedures for hands, environmental surfaces and laundry in healthcare, domestic, food handling and other settings.

Authors:  Sally F Bloomfield; Philip C Carling; Martin Exner
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2017-06-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.