Literature DB >> 25240452

Mechanical abnormalities detected with conventional echocardiography are associated with response and midterm survival in CRT.

Adelina Doltra1, Bart Bijnens2, José M Tolosana3, Roger Borràs3, Malek Khatib3, Diego Penela3, Teresa Maria De Caralt3, María Ángeles Castel3, Antonio Berruezo3, Josep Brugada3, Lluís Mont3, Marta Sitges3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to identify "correctable abnormalities" using conventional grayscale and blood-pool Doppler echocardiography and evaluate their ability to predict both response and midterm survival.
BACKGROUND: Identification of mechanical abnormalities that may be corrected with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is useful for predicting echocardiographic response at 1-year follow-up.
METHODS: A total of 200 CRT patients were included. Clinical evaluation and echocardiography were performed before and after CRT to assess the presence of the mechanical abnormalities of interest (septal flash, abnormal ventricular filling, or exaggerated interventricular dependence). Response to CRT was defined as a reduction in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume (ESV) ≥15%. Four subgroups of extent of response were defined: LVESV reduction >26.68% (extensive remodeling); LVESV reduction 6.8% to 26.68% (slight remodeling); LVESV reduction <6.8% (no remodeling) and clinical response; and LVESV reduction <6.8% without clinical response or the occurrence of death or heart transplantation. Midterm cardiovascular survival was evaluated (mean follow-up 38 ± 19 months).
RESULTS: The presence of a correctable abnormality was independently associated with a better rate (odds ratio: 0.03 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01 to 0.10], p < 0.001) and extent of response to CRT (n = 59 [96.7%] for the extensive remodeling subgroup vs. n = 53 [85.5%] for the slight remodeling subgroup vs. n = 19 [47.5%] for the no remodeling with clinical response subgroup vs. n = 17 [45.9%] for the no remodeling without clinical response subgroup, p = 0.0001), as well as with increased midterm survival (hazard ratio: 0.11 [95% CI: 0.2 to 0.6]). Other independent predictors included creatinine level and LV end-systolic diameter for response; New York Heart Association functional class IV, creatinine, LV end-systolic diameter, and transmurality index for extent of response; and New York Heart Association functional class IV for cardiovascular mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a correctable abnormality evaluated by conventional echocardiography is associated with LV reverse remodeling and better survival at midterm follow-up. Clinical characteristics and myocardial viability also have an influence.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  echocardiography; heart failure; resynchronization; septal flash; survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25240452     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Donato Mele; Matteo Bertini; Michele Malagù; Marianna Nardozza; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Tracking Early Systolic Motion for Assessing Acute Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Real Time.

Authors:  Manuel Villegas-Martinez; Magnus Reinsfelt Krogh; Øyvind S Andersen; Ole Jakob Sletten; Ali Wajdan; Hans Henrik Odland; Ole Jakob Elle; Espen W Remme
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Prediction efficiency of serum cystatin C for clinical outcome in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Zhong-Bao Ruan; Ge-Cai Chen; Yin Ren; Li Zhu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Clinical utility of speckle-tracking echocardiography in cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  Sitara G Khan; Dimitris Klettas; Stam Kapetanakis; Mark J Monaghan
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2016-03-08

5.  Patient-specific heart simulation can identify non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Akihiro Isotani; Kazunori Yoneda; Takashi Iwamura; Masahiro Watanabe; Jun-Ichi Okada; Takumi Washio; Seiryo Sugiura; Toshiaki Hisada; Kenji Ando
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  Septal Flash as a Predictor of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sadie Bennett; Jacopo Tafuro; Simon Duckett; Grant Heatlie; Ashish Patwala; Diane Barker; Arzu Cubukcu; Fozia Zahir Ahmed; Chun Shing Kwok
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr       Date:  2022-01-24

7.  Septal flash correction with His-Purkinje pacing predicts echocardiographic response in resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Margarida Pujol-López; Rafael Jiménez Arjona; Eduard Guasch; Adelina Doltra; Roger Borràs; Ivo Roca Luque; María Ángeles Castel; Paz Garre; Elisenda Ferró; Mireia Niebla; Esther Carro; Elena Arbelo; Marta Sitges; José M Tolosana; Lluís Mont
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Electro-echocardiographic Indices to Predict Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Non-response on Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Ziqing Yu; Xueying Chen; Fei Han; Shengmei Qin; Minghui Li; Yuan Wu; Yangang Su; Junbo Ge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The Role of Echocardiography in the Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Michael Spartalis; Eleni Tzatzaki; Eleftherios Spartalis; Christos Damaskos; Antonios Athanasiou; Efthimios Livanis; Vassilis Voudris
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2017-12-19

10.  Prediction of clinical outcome in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy - the role of NT-ProBNP and a combined response score.

Authors:  Z Bakos; N C Chatterjee; C Reitan; J P Singh; R Borgquist
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.298

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.