Hsuan-Li Huang1, Hsin-Hua Chou2, Tien-Yu Wu2, Shang-Hung Chang3, Yueh-Ju Tsai4, Shuo-Suei Hung5, Chun-Te Lu6, Shih-Tsung Cheng2, Kuan-Hung Yeh2, Heng-Chia Chang2. 1. Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei Branch, Taiwan. Electronic address: huang304@gmail.com. 2. Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei Branch, Taiwan. 3. Second Section of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan. 4. Department of Plastic Surgery, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei Branch, Taiwan. 5. Department of Orthopedics, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei Branch, Taiwan. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Midterm outcomes of endovascular intervention (EVI) for critical limb ischemia (CLI) have not been previously reported in Taiwan. This study assessed the safety, feasibility, and patient-oriented outcomes for CLI patients after EVI. METHODS: From June 2005 to December 2011, 270 patients underwent EVI for CLI of 333 limbs. Primary patency (PP), assisted primary patency (AP), limb salvage, sustained clinical success (SCS), secondary SCS (SSCS), and survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The procedural success rate was 89%, and the periprocedural mortality and major complication rates within 30 days were 0.6% and 6.9%, respectively. During the mean follow-up time of 27 ± 20 months (1-77), 64 patients died and 25 legs required major amputation. Eighty-one percent of the patients with tissue loss had wound healing at 6 months and 75% of the patients were ambulatory, with or without assisting devices, at 1 year. The overall survival and limb salvage rates at 3 years were 70% and 90%, respectively. The PP and AP at 1 and 3 years were 58% and 37% and 79% and 61%, respectively. The SCS and SSCS were 65% and 46% and 80% and 64% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: In Taiwan, EVI was a safe and feasible procedure for CLI patients, with a high procedural success rate and lower complication rate. Sustained limb salvage and clinical success can be afforded with an active surveillance program and prompt intervention during midterm follow-up.
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Midterm outcomes of endovascular intervention (EVI) for critical limb ischemia (CLI) have not been previously reported in Taiwan. This study assessed the safety, feasibility, and patient-oriented outcomes for CLI patients after EVI. METHODS: From June 2005 to December 2011, 270 patients underwent EVI for CLI of 333 limbs. Primary patency (PP), assisted primary patency (AP), limb salvage, sustained clinical success (SCS), secondary SCS (SSCS), and survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The procedural success rate was 89%, and the periprocedural mortality and major complication rates within 30 days were 0.6% and 6.9%, respectively. During the mean follow-up time of 27 ± 20 months (1-77), 64 patients died and 25 legs required major amputation. Eighty-one percent of the patients with tissue loss had wound healing at 6 months and 75% of the patients were ambulatory, with or without assisting devices, at 1 year. The overall survival and limb salvage rates at 3 years were 70% and 90%, respectively. The PP and AP at 1 and 3 years were 58% and 37% and 79% and 61%, respectively. The SCS and SSCS were 65% and 46% and 80% and 64% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: In Taiwan, EVI was a safe and feasible procedure for CLI patients, with a high procedural success rate and lower complication rate. Sustained limb salvage and clinical success can be afforded with an active surveillance program and prompt intervention during midterm follow-up.