Literature DB >> 25240247

Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: a normative study.

Lindsey N Van Yper1, Katrien Vermeire2, Eddy F J De Vel3, Rolf-Dieter Battmer4, Ingeborg J M Dhooge5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Binaural interaction can be investigated using auditory evoked potentials. A binaural interaction component can be derived from the auditory brainstem response (ABR-BIC) and is considered evidence for binaural interaction at the level of the brainstem. Although click ABR-BIC has been investigated thoroughly, data on 500 Hz tone-burst (TB) ABR-BICs are scarce. In this study, characteristics of click and 500 Hz TB ABR-BICs are described. Furthermore, reliability of both click and 500 Hz TB ABR-BIC are investigated.
METHODS: Eighteen normal hearing young adults (eight women, ten men) were included. ABRs were recorded in response to clicks and 500 Hz TBs. ABR-BICs were derived by subtracting the binaural response from the sum of the monaural responses measured in opposite ears.
RESULTS: Good inter-rater reliability is obtained for both click and 500 Hz TB ABR-BICs. The most reliable peak in click ABR-BIC occurs at a mean latency of 6.06 ms (SD 0.354 ms). Reliable 500 Hz TB ABR-BIC are obtained with a mean latency of 9.47 ms (SD 0.678 ms). Amplitudes are larger for 500 Hz TB ABR-BIC than for clicks.
CONCLUSION: The most reliable peak in click ABR-BIC occurs at the downslope of wave V. Five hundred Hertz TB ABR-BIC is characterized by a broad positivity occurring at the level of wave V. SIGNIFICANCE: The ABR-BIC is a useful technique to investigate binaural interaction in certain populations. Examples are bilateral hearing aid users, bilateral cochlear implant users and bimodal listeners. The latter refers to the combination of unilateral cochlear implantation and contralateral residual hearing. The majority of these patients have residual hearing in the low frequencies. The current study suggests that 500 Hz TB ABR-BIC may be a suitable technique to assess binaural interaction in this specific population of cochlear implant users.
Copyright © 2014 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABR; Auditory brainstem response; Binaural difference wave; Binaural interaction component; Normal

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25240247     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.07.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  5 in total

1.  A Comparison of Two Objective Measures of Binaural Processing: The Interaural Phase Modulation Following Response and the Binaural Interaction Component.

Authors:  Nicholas R Haywood; Jaime A Undurraga; Torsten Marquardt; David McAlpine
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.293

2.  Normative Study of the Binaural Interaction Component of the Human Auditory Brainstem Response as a Function of Interaural Time Differences.

Authors:  Carol A Sammeth; Nathaniel T Greene; Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses).

Authors:  Nicolas Guevara; Michel Hoen; Eric Truy; Stéphane Gallego
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Objective Binaural Loudness Balancing Based on 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses. Part II: Asymmetric and Bimodal Hearing.

Authors:  Maaike Van Eeckhoutte; Dimitar Spirrov; Jan Wouters; Tom Francart
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Verification of a Mobile Psychoacoustic Test System.

Authors:  Jordana C Soares; Sangamanatha A Veeranna; Vijay Parsa; Chris Allan; Winnie Ly; Minh Duong; Paula Folkeard; Sheila Moodie; Prudence Allen
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2021-12-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.