Literature DB >> 25240175

Transition of COM-COP relative phase in a dynamic balance task.

Ji-Hyun Ko1, John H Challis2, Karl M Newell2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the coordination between center of mass (COM) and center of pressure (COP) could be a candidate collective variable of a dynamical system that captures the organization of the multi-segmental whole body postural control system. We examined the transition of the COM-COP coordination pattern in a moving platform balance control paradigm. 10 young healthy adults stood on a moving surface of support that within a trial was sinusoidally translated in the anterior-posterior direction continuously scaling up and then down its frequency within the range from 0Hz to 3.0Hz. The COP was derived from a single force platform mounted on the moving surface of support. 4 angular joint motions (ankle, knee, hip, and neck) were measured by a 3D motion analysis system that also allowed COM to be derived. The COM-COP coordination changed from in-phase/anti-phase to anti-phase/in-phase at a certain frequency of the support surface, showed hysteresis as a function of the direction of frequency change and higher variability at the transition region. Conversely, the transition of the ankle-hip coordination consistently occurred at 0.3Hz across subjects with little between or within subject variability as a function of transition frequency and before the COM-COP transition. The findings provide evidence that: (1) the transition of the COM-COP coordination pattern is that of a non-equilibrium phase transition with critical fluctuations and hysteresis; and (2) that COM-COP coupling is a candidate collective variable of the multi-segmental whole body postural control system acting on a redundant postural task.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collective variable; Phase transition; Postural control; Self-organization

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25240175     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  5 in total

1.  Real-time visual feedback of COM and COP motion properties differentially modifies postural control structures.

Authors:  Melissa C Kilby; Peter C M Molenaar; Semyon M Slobounov; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Scaling oscillatory platform frequency reveals recurrence of intermittent postural attractor states.

Authors:  Aviroop Dutt-Mazumder; Troy J Rand; Mukul Mukherjee; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Devices and tasks involved in the objective assessment of standing dynamic balancing - A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Bálint Petró; Alexandra Papachatzopoulou; Rita M Kiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Bidirectional causal control in the dynamics of handstand balance.

Authors:  Hannah E Wyatt; Domenico Vicinanza; Karl M Newell; Gareth Irwin; Genevieve K R Williams
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Task Specific and General Patterns of Joint Motion Variability in Upright- and Hand-Standing Postures.

Authors:  Moira Pryhoda; Karl M Newell; Cassie Wilson; Gareth Irwin
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 2.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.