Literature DB >> 25239794

General trends in selectively driven codon usage biases in the domain archaea.

Andrés Iriarte1, Eugenio Jara, Lucía Leytón, Leticia Diana, Héctor Musto.   

Abstract

Since the advent of rapid techniques for sequencing DNA in the mid 70's, it became clear that all codons coding for the same amino acid are not used according to neutral expectations. In the last 30 years, several theories were proposed for explaining this fact. However, the most important concepts were the result of analyses carried out in Bacteria, and unicellular and multicellular eukaryotes like mammals (in other words, in two of the three Domains of life). In this communication, we study the main forces that shape codon usage in Archaeae under an evolutionary perspective. This is important because, as known, the orthologous genes related with the informational system in this Domain (replication, transcription and translation) are more similar to eukaryotes than to Bacteria. Our results show that the effect of selection acting at the level of translation is present in the Domain but mainly restricted to only a phylum (Euryarchaeota) and therefore is not as extended as in Bacteria. Besides, we describe the phylogenetic distribution of translational optimal codons and estimate the effect of selection acting at the level of accuracy. Finally, we discuss these results under some peculiarities that characterize this Domain.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25239794     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-014-9647-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  35 in total

1.  Divergent transcriptional and translational signals in Archaea.

Authors:  Elfar Torarinsson; Hans-Peter Klenk; Roger A Garrett
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.491

2.  The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage.

Authors:  M Bulmer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genomic evidence for two functionally distinct gene classes.

Authors:  M C Rivera; R Jain; J E Moore; J A Lake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs.

Authors:  T Ikemura
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Missense misreading of asparagine codons as a function of codon identity and context.

Authors:  J Precup; J Parker
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1987-08-15       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  In vivo introduction of unpreferred synonymous codons into the Drosophila Adh gene results in reduced levels of ADH protein.

Authors:  David B Carlini; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Isolation and cultivation of Walsby's square archaeon.

Authors:  Henk Bolhuis; Evelien M Te Poele; Francisco Rodriguez-Valera
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 9.  Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias.

Authors:  Joshua B Plotkin; Grzegorz Kudla
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  1 in total

1.  Codon Usage Heterogeneity in the Multipartite Prokaryote Genome: Selection-Based Coding Bias Associated with Gene Location, Expression Level, and Ancestry.

Authors:  J L López; M J Lozano; A Lagares; M L Fabre; W O Draghi; M F Del Papa; M Pistorio; A Becker; D Wibberg; A Schlüter; A Pühler; J Blom; A Goesmann; A Lagares
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 7.867

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.