Literature DB >> 25239631

Evaluation of in silico models for the identification of respiratory sensitizers.

Sander Dik1, Janine Ezendam2, Albert R Cunningham3, Carl Alex Carrasquer2, Henk van Loveren1, Emiel Rorije4.   

Abstract

Low molecular weight (LMW) respiratory sensitizers can cause occupational asthma but due to a lack of adequate test methods, prospective identification of respiratory sensitizers is currently not possible. This article presents the evaluation of structure-activity relationship (SAR) models as potential methods to prospectively conclude on the sensitization potential of LMW chemicals. The predictive performance of the SARs calculated from their training sets was compared to their performance on a dataset of newly identified respiratory sensitizers and nonsensitizers, derived from literature. The predictivity of the available SARs for new substances was markedly lower than their published predictive performance. For that reason, no single SAR model can be considered sufficiently reliable to conclude on potential LMW respiratory sensitization properties of a substance. The individual applicability domains (ADs) of the models were analyzed for adequacies and deficiencies. Based on these findings, a tiered prediction approach is subsequently proposed. This approach combines the two SARs with the highest positive and negative predictivity taking into account model specific chemical AD issues. The tiered approach provided reliable predictions for one-third of the respiratory sensitizers and nonsensitizers of the external validation set compiled by us. For these chemicals, a positive predictive value of 96% and a negative predictive value of 89% were obtained. The tiered approach was not able to predict the other two-thirds of the chemicals, meaning that additional information is required and that there is an urgent need for other test methods, e.g., in chemico or in vitro, to reach a reliable conclusion.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (Q)SAR; alternatives to animal testing; chemical allergy; predictive toxicology; respiratory sensitization; tiered approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25239631     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  6 in total

1.  Modeling and insights into molecular basis of low molecular weight respiratory sensitizers.

Authors:  Xueyan Cui; Rui Yang; Siwen Li; Juan Liu; Qiuyun Wu; Xiao Li
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.943

2.  In silico approaches in organ toxicity hazard assessment: Current status and future needs for predicting heart, kidney and lung toxicities.

Authors:  Arianna Bassan; Vinicius M Alves; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Lisa Beilke; Andreas Bender; Autumn Bernal; Mark T D Cronin; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Candice Johnson; Raymond Kemper; Moiz Mumtaz; Louise Neilson; Manuela Pavan; Amy Pointon; Julia Pletz; Patricia Ruiz; Daniel P Russo; Yogesh Sabnis; Reena Sandhu; Markus Schaefer; Lidiya Stavitskaya; David T Szabo; Jean-Pierre Valentin; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-13

3.  Chemical-induced asthma and the role of clinical, toxicological, exposure and epidemiological research in regulatory and hazard characterization approaches.

Authors:  Melissa J Vincent; Jonathan A Bernstein; David Basketter; Judy S LaKind; G Scott Dotson; Andrew Maier
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Mapping Chemical Respiratory Sensitization: How Useful Are Our Current Computational Tools?

Authors:  Emily Golden; Mikhail Maertens; Thomas Hartung; Alexandra Maertens
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  An Explainable Supervised Machine Learning Model for Predicting Respiratory Toxicity of Chemicals Using Optimal Molecular Descriptors.

Authors:  Keerthana Jaganathan; Hilal Tayara; Kil To Chong
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 6.  Asthma-inducing potential of 28 substances in spray cleaning products-Assessed by quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) testing and literature review.

Authors:  Niels Hadrup; Marie Frederiksen; Eva B Wedebye; Nikolai G Nikolov; Tanja K Carøe; Jorid B Sørli; Karen B Frydendall; Biase Liguori; Camilla S Sejbaek; Peder Wolkoff; Esben M Flachs; Vivi Schlünssen; Harald W Meyer; Per A Clausen; Karin S Hougaard
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 3.628

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.