Literature DB >> 25239476

Networks for memory, perception, and decision-making, and beyond to how the syntax for language might be implemented in the brain.

Edmund T Rolls1, Gustavo Deco2.   

Abstract

Neural principles that provide a foundation for memory, perception, and decision-making include place coding with sparse distributed representations, associative synaptic modification, and attractor networks in which the storage capacity is in the order of the number of associatively modifiable recurrent synapses on any one neuron. Based on those and further principles of cortical computation, hypotheses are explored in which syntax is encoded in the cortex using sparse distributed place coding. Each cortical module 2-3 mm in diameter is proposed to be formed of a local attractor neuronal network with a capacity in the order of 10,000 words (e.g. subjects, verbs or objects depending on the module). Such a system may form a deep language-of-thought layer. For the information to be communicated to other people, the modules in which the neurons are firing which encode the syntactic role, as well as which neurons are firing to specify the words, must be communicated. It is proposed that one solution to this (used in English) is temporal order encoding, for example subject-verb-object. It is shown with integrate-and-fire simulations that this order encoding could be implemented by weakly forward-coupled subject-verb-object modules. A related system can decode a temporal sequence. This approach based on known principles of cortical computation needs to be extended to investigate further whether it could form a biological foundation for the implementation of language in the brain. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Brain and Memory.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attractor network; Language; Semantics; Short-term memory; Stochastic neurodynamics; Syntax

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25239476     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.09.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  10 in total

Review 1.  Brain rhythm attractor breakdown in Alzheimer's disease: Functional and pathologic implications.

Authors:  Elissaios Karageorgiou; Keith A Vossel
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 2.  Itinerancy between attractor states in neural systems.

Authors:  Paul Miller
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 3.  Biological constraints on neural network models of cognitive function.

Authors:  Friedemann Pulvermüller; Rosario Tomasello; Malte R Henningsen-Schomers; Thomas Wennekers
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Mind Causality: A Computational Neuroscience Approach.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  A model of individualized canonical microcircuits supporting cognitive operations.

Authors:  Tim Kunze; Andre D H Peterson; Jens Haueisen; Thomas R Knösche
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Emergence of cognitive priming and structure building from the hierarchical interaction of canonical microcircuit models.

Authors:  Tim Kunze; Jens Haueisen; Thomas R Knösche
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 7.  Neural Computations Underlying Phenomenal Consciousness: A Higher Order Syntactic Thought Theory.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-07

8.  Brain dynamics: the temporal variability of connectivity, and differences in schizophrenia and ADHD.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls; Wei Cheng; Jianfeng Feng
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  A Spiking Neurocomputational Model of High-Frequency Oscillatory Brain Responses to Words and Pseudowords.

Authors:  Max Garagnani; Guglielmo Lucchese; Rosario Tomasello; Thomas Wennekers; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  The connections of neocortical pyramidal cells can implement the learning of new categories, attractor memory, and top-down recall and attention.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.270

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.