Literature DB >> 25239343

A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of Surgisis Gold, a biologic prosthetic, as a sublay reinforcement of the fascial closure after open bariatric surgery.

Michael G Sarr1, Neil E Hutcher2, Scott Snyder3, Jason Hodde3, Brennan Carmody2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial was performed to compare the effectiveness of the bioprosthesis Surgisis Gold (Cook Biotech, Inc, West Lafayette, IN) to suture closure alone in reinforcing the abdominal wall after open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).
METHODS: A total of 402 adult patients (body mass index ≥35 kg/m(2)) scheduled to undergo open RYGB procedures were randomized to receive either Surgisis Gold placed as a sublay directly under and opposed to the posterior rectus fascia without intervening preperitoneal fat or suture closure alone. Peri- and postoperative complications were tracked. Incisional hernia formation in each group was examined at 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 9 months, and 1 and 2 years after RYGB.
RESULTS: A total of 380 (78 male; 302 female) patients with a mean age of 45 years (range 18-69) and a mean BMI of 48 (range 35-79) underwent RYGB. There were no differences in patient demographics or comorbidities between groups. Placement of the Surgisis Gold increased operating time by an average of 14 minutes. Complications were more common in the Surgisis Gold group with significantly more wound events and seroma formation compared with the suture closure alone group. At final follow-up, 32 of 185 (17%) of patients in the reinforced arm and 38 of 195 (20%) in the suture alone arm developed an incisional hernia (P = .6).
CONCLUSION: In this challenging patient population, the use of Surgisis Gold for reinforcing the abdominal wall after open RYGB was not shown to be greatly different from a primary suture repair.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25239343     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Prophylactic meshes in the abdominal wall. German version].

Authors:  F E Muysoms; U A Dietz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Prophylactic Mesh After Midline Laparotomy: Evidence is out There, but why do Surgeons Hesitate?

Authors:  Martijn Depuydt; Mathias Allaeys; Luis Abreu de Carvalho; Aude Vanlander; Frederik Berrevoet
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Prophylactic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Following Midline Laparotomy-Long-Term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Philippe M Glauser; Philippe Brosi; Benjamin Speich; Samuel A Käser; Andres Heigl; Robert Rosenberg; Christoph A Maurer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Prophylactic mesh reinforcement for midline incisional hernia prevention: systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A Aiolfi; M Cavalli; F Gambero; E Mini; F Lombardo; L Gordini; G Bonitta; P G Bruni; D Bona; G Campanelli
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 5.  The effect of prophylactic mesh implantation on the development of incisional hernias in patients with elevated BMI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Pianka; A Werba; R Klotz; F Schuh; E Kalkum; P Probst; A Ramouz; E Khajeh; M W Büchler; J C Harnoss
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.920

Review 6.  Prophylactic meshes in the abdominal wall.

Authors:  F E Muysoms; U A Dietz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Prevention of Incisional Hernias with Biological Mesh: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Filip E Muysoms; An Jairam; Manuel López-Cano; Maciej Śmietański; Guido Woeste; Iris Kyle-Leinhase; Stavros A Antoniou; Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-09-26

8.  Prevention of incisional hernia after midline laparotomy with prophylactic mesh reinforcement: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  A P Jairam; M López-Cano; J M Garcia-Alamino; J A Pereira; L Timmermans; J Jeekel; J Lange; F Muysoms
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-02-14

9.  Prophylactic, Synthetic Intraperitoneal Mesh Versus No Mesh Implantation in Patients with Fascial Dehiscence.

Authors:  Manuel O Jakob; Daniel Spari; Joel Zindel; Tawan Pinworasarn; Daniel Candinas; Guido Beldi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Biomechanical Parameters of Mesh Reinforcement and Analysis of a Novel Device for Incisional Hernia Prevention.

Authors:  Charles A Messa; Jonathan Sanchez; Geoffrey M Kozak; Snehal Shetye; Ashley Rodriguez; John P Fischer
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.